.
Feedback

Canine Resort to Open in Briarcliff Manor

The North State Road facility is currently under construction.

"If you like dogs, that's great. Even if you love dogs, I understand. But, it's a very big difference to love dogs," explained Nicole Goudey-Rigger, as she crossed her arms across her chest. "I mean, in the core of your being where it doesn't matter if there's dog hair in your coffee or that you just got a poop print on your shirt."

Goudey-Rigger is the owner of Pets a Go Go, a dog walking and pet sitting company that is opening up a facility in Briarcliff Manor...and she—and her 10 full-time employees—love dogs.

A combination of summer camp, daycare and a "gymboree-ish" atmosphere—all for canines—is the vision the Chappaqua resident has for her new facility on North State Road, just down the street from The , which she has partners with on a regular basis.

"It's a neat environment," Goudey-Rigger said. "It kind of builds on what we have been doing for the last eight years."

Pets a Go Go came about when Goudey-Rigger and another pet business owner merged their ventures in 2008.

"For me, it's sort of gone from this 100-client, 60 dogs a day kind of environment, to now we do at least 150 households a day and have about 975 clients right now," she shared. "It's kind of grown to the point now where it's hiking, walking, medical assistance—we help out with all that."

Currently, the company offers everything from daily dog walks to overnight pet and house sitting.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone everyday with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

The new facility, expected to open by the end of April, "was sort of a natural extension to do more training and more overnights," Goudey-Rigger explained. "Up until this date, we either sleep in the home or the pet sleeps in our home. There's only so much you can do."

Pets a Go Go in Briarcliff Manor will be an 18,000-square-foot facility with an additional .75 acres of outdoor space, complete with overnight staff and an "indoor potty."

In addition to the large play area—fitted with grates covered with natural material that can be used by the dogs as a bathroom—the facility will have retail, reception, office, shower, bathroom and grooming areas.

"The play area will be cage-free at all times," said Goudey-Rigger, who added dogs will need to undergo a temperament test before signing up.

She expects to house up to 40 dogs during the day and 20-30 overnight, who will enjoy a schedule that includes breakfast, play time, lessons for those signed up for a "stay and train environment," more playtime, dinner and a designated lights-out time.

In the summer, the outdoor space will be used for water sports and activities like paw-printing, she shared.

"Accessibility and reliability," Goudey-Rigger said, are the elements that have earned her a loyal client base over the years that continues to expand.

She currently accepts work as far south as the Bronx and as far north as Rhinebeck in Dutchess County. Pets a Go Go's east-west boundaries spread to Nanuet in Rockland County and Stamford, CT.

"As a company, I'm very conscious of not growing too fast," she explained. "If I can't keep this quality, then I'm going to hurt myself."

Goudey-Rigger has found many clients turn to Pets a Go Go after bad experiences with pet care.

"I had a couple of really seriously bad experiences in the kenneling world," she shared. "My second Yorkie went to a kennel once in her entire life and came back with an opportunistic lung infection. She spent the last two years of her life on antibiotics."

Goudey-Rigger, who previously had a career on Wall Street, doesn't fault kennels for this type of mishap, but wanted her company to give clients the same results they can expect from a moving company or insurance company—"professional, accountable and on the books."

"This is what my guys do for a living. It's how they feed their families, so it's a real job," she explained.

She plans to bring this accountability and quality to the Briarcliff Manor facility and may even continue expanding Pets a Go Go in the future.

"I would love to see someone else love this business in another location, because I do think it's transferable, especially for woman," Goudey-Rigger said. "I would love to see this thing fly."


Like us on Facebook
 | Follow us on Twitter | Sign up for our newsletter

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 03:02 pm
This year’s school budget is a REDUCTION in spending by the district versus last year’sRead More budget. We are the ONLY district in Westchester to forward a reduction for our community to vote on. The reason we will slightly violate the tax-cap is due to the fiscal irresponsibility of a prior board using fund balance to cushion the budget and create the illusion of a cap-compliant budget. Please join me in re-electing Jon Satran and Sal Maglietta. Please also join me in voting YES on this year’s school budget.
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 03:01 pm
On a related note, Mr. Venditti also displays a very disturbing understanding of what drivesRead More property values here in Westchester. Property values are driven by the perceived quality of the school district and the perceived support within the district for academic excellence. For a community like Briarcliff to vote down a school budget because it raises taxes approximately $27.50/year for an $800k home is suicidal from a property value standpoint. Go ahead folks, follow the advice of Mr. Venditti and vote this school budget down, then watch your property values plummet for years to come. Continued...
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 03:00 pm
While I certainly respect Mr. Venditti’s right to voice his opinion, it is clear that hisRead More letter is nothing more than a desperate last ditch attempt to prop up his imploding candidates. The claims and accusations made by Mr. Venditti are candidly preposterous. He cannot possibly be watching the same school board the rest of the community has been watching over the last few years. Please proceed with great caution when you are offered such blatant revisionist history. Continued...
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 02:53 pm
Mr. Linder, This is YOUR post folks are responding to and your ideas. I find it curious at bestRead More that you began a public forum comment blog but advocate throughout your responses that the discussion should be taken off-line and out of public view. this really doesn't position you well as an advocate for transparency.
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 05:07 pm
CORRECTION TO LAST POST: The last sentence should read: "Let's continue to share, butRead More face-to-face." Thx - Sonny
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 06:06 am
Thanks, Jon - you raise important considerations and in a calm, dispassionate way, which IRead More appreciate. As for alternative funding mechanisms, in hindsight I believe they should have been examined and addressed this earlier this year had the decision-making been opened up to the public in a completely bidirectional manner much earlier in this year's budget cycle. A real take-away from this situation, in my opinion, is that we in the community were not given the opportunity to sit down together with sharpened pencils in a public forum and allowed to vet and actually challenge the Administration's assumptions in order to arrive at budget alternatives with the Administration and Board. The comparison you make with Washington is indeed apt in that it reflects the way decisions have slid back to being made in a vacuum and handed down to the voters instead of in a democratic fashion based on budget-to-actuals instead of budget-to-budget figures combined with the practice of over-reserving for expense items while under-estimating revenues. Although the Board did indeed reach out to me and 2 others asking for suggestions, when we re-iterated our request for an open meeting format to include other financially savvy community members, these requests were consistently ignored. Which is why we are in the current position we are in having to decide on Tues on a tax levy cap-busting budget requiring 60% super-majority. Which the public will decide, of course, and we will live with the consequences: either it passes, or the Board and Administration will be forced to rein in the excesses. And much as I love open debate, I restate that online posting leaves does leave a lot to be desired. Let's continue to share, but not face-to-face. Respectfully - Sonny
JanFisher May 17, 2013 at 10:55 pm
It is so wonderful that, recognizing the importance of STEM and following the recommendation of ourRead More educators, Sal Maglietta and Jon Satran agreed to bring on the district's first director of instructional technology.
McKey Rivers May 10, 2013 at 07:36 pm
Thank you Dr. Sternberg for your thoughtful letter. You hit on an important facet of this electionRead More few if any others have stated: electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder will provide the added benefit of diversity of thought as the Board continues to address difficult, ongoing educational and financial issues. There is a woeful absence of synergy produced by articulation of different views among the current Board members. The absence of a “check and balance” on the current Board is reflected in the inexplicable decision to cancel the May 13 BOE meeting (scheduled since last summer), which is the last meeting prior to the May 21 budget vote and board election. Is there no business for the Board to conduct at this critical juncture or could it be that the Board does not want Briarcliff residents to hear members of the community question the Board about the proposed budget right before the election? Electing either Mr. Linder and/or Mr. Wasserman will immediately benefit the public as the highest vote getter will be seated on May 22 and thus participate in formulating a second budget for public vote that, notwithstanding current BOE scare tactics, can be tax levy compliant and not involve additional program elimination or reduction. There is no doubt that electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder to the Briarcliff School Board will substantially benefit the entire Briarcliff community and provide a much needed check on Board decision making.
Herman Sexton May 10, 2013 at 03:48 pm
Electing Paul Wasserman alone would add a diversity of thought. The guy hears at least a dozenRead More voices in his head. Have you ever spoken to him? Did you pay attention when he was running for Congress for a few weeks? Ugh.