.
Feedback

Inside One of Westchester's First LEED Homes

The 3,000 sq. ft. home at 64 Holbrooke Rd. will be on display as a part of the German traveling pavilion to spur international talk on energy efficient technology and solar energy use.

White Plains' Gerry Angel has been out of her house of more than 30 years, at 64 Holbrooke Rd., since December. However, she says it will have been worth the wait when she moves back in at the end of July.

This is because the 1953 ranch-style home has been fully renovated to work with nature instead of against it.

“I can’t wait to live in it,” said an ecstatic Angel, a real estate broker with Keller Williams NY Realty. “You walk into that house and you just feel a difference in the insulation. It is so quiet there, and it just feels so healthy!”

The environmentally conscious home is the third in Westchester and first in White Plains to be Leader in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certified, a designation by the U.S. Green Building Council. Angel’s home is expected to receive a LEED for Homes Gold rating when it is completed.

An open house at 64 Holbrooke Rd. will be held on Saturday, July 14 from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.

In addition to a tour, attendees can talk to the professionals behind the build—including Christina Griffin Architect, PC and Murphy Brothers Contracting—as well as eco-friendly vendors—like Green Star Energy Solutions, Total Green, Authentic Window Design, Briarcliff Manor's Sunrise Solar Solutions and Greener by Design—who can advise attendees how they can make eco-friendly adjustments to their homes that save energy and cut costs. 

The City of White Plains is providing bus transportation between the White Plains LEED for Homes project and the Das Haus Tour, featuring the Das Haus Pavilion, a “passive house”, in the parking lot at 125 Court St. from July 10 to July 19. 

The traveling exhibition is on its North American tour to share German ideas on sustainable construction (click on the PDF for more information in the brochure). The pavilion is made solely using sustainable features, including specialized insulation, heat recovery ventilations and cooling, triple-pane windows and solar technology. 

Coincidentally, Christina Griffin of Christina Griffin Architect, PC based in Hasting-on-Hudson, is currently taking courses for a certification to be a passive house consultant.

“I wanted to learn that technology and it’s just been a total awakening for me,” said Griffin. “You actually use physics to decide how you handle insulation and air tightness and use it as a design tool, so you end up with a super energy efficient building, so that you don’t need energy to heat that building.” 

Among 64 Holbrooke’s green features is its air tightness rating of 28, which means it is 72 percent more efficient than a conventional house, according to Griffin.

To achieve its Gold LEED certification, Angel’s home has been renovated to include:

  • energy saving spray foam insulation
  • geo-thermal heating and cooling; that heats the home and water, and supplies air conditioning
  • heat recovery ventilation that maintains a healthy indoor air climate
  • custom energy efficient windows
  • solar panels, which covers all of the home’s electricity use
  • LED and fluorescent lighting
  • water saving fixtures
  • sustainable landscaping, using drought resistant native plants that are irrigated by a rain harvesting collection system for water efficiency
  • an open space layout that uses daylight to reduce need for electrical fixtures
  • paint that is free of volitile organic compounds (VOCs) 
  • formaldehyde free cabinetry

Angel—who is a certified “eco-broker” that has credentials to educate clients on green technology incentives and real estate—said she is pleased with the attention her home has been getting, as she hoped the LEED certification would serve as an inspiration to other homeowners.

She even started a blog for her neighbors.

“[Her neighbors] are so excited about it and they want to know about it,” said Angel. “One of my neighbors put insulation in his home home, another was inquiring about the geothermal and the solar. So, it’s really interested how it’s [her home's eco-friendly features] encouraged others to adopt green technology.” 

While Angel said that using sustainable construction could become expensive (the cost of her driveway rose from $3,000 to $10,000 with the use of eco-friendly materials), however there are federal and state tax credits that can make those costs more reasonable. Contractors who perform the work can also help homeowners identify and go through the tax credit process.

Angel will also save money through energy savings, as her energy costs for running the house will shrink from around $1,350 a month to $90 a month.

“I believe all of us have a responsibility to reduce our carbon footprint and create a sustainable environment,” said Angel. “We are just a very wasteful nation and I think it’s important we become aware of it, and do our part to reduce that kind of waste and do more to live energy efficiently.”

Michael Murphy—the director of new project development for Murphy Brothers Contracting, based in Mamaroneck—said another way to incorporate energy saving technology is considering energy efficient alternatives when making necessary upgrades to your home.

“If someone didn’t want to do a major renovation you could get an energy audit,” said Murphy. “Energy auditors can make recommendations on basic projects that could make your home more energy efficient than it is now.”

While green building is popular in Illinois, Maine, the South, and North West—Angel says that New York is slowly taking it on, but taking it on nonetheless. Griffin and Murphy says that more and more of their customers are asking for eco-friendly features.


Like us on Facebook | Follow us on Twitter | Sign up for our newsletter

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 03:57 pm
The damage done by the prior BOE majority has begun a cycle of meaningful healing under the currentRead More BOE majority. Continued...
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 03:16 pm
The damage done by the prior BOE majority has begun a cycle of meaningful healing under the currentRead More BOE majority. Continued...
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 03:02 pm
This year’s school budget is a REDUCTION in spending by the district versus last year’sRead More budget. We are the ONLY district in Westchester to forward a reduction for our community to vote on. The reason we will slightly violate the tax-cap is due to the fiscal irresponsibility of a prior board using fund balance to cushion the budget and create the illusion of a cap-compliant budget. Please join me in re-electing Jon Satran and Sal Maglietta. Please also join me in voting YES on this year’s school budget.
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 02:53 pm
Mr. Linder, This is YOUR post folks are responding to and your ideas. I find it curious at bestRead More that you began a public forum comment blog but advocate throughout your responses that the discussion should be taken off-line and out of public view. this really doesn't position you well as an advocate for transparency.
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 05:07 pm
CORRECTION TO LAST POST: The last sentence should read: "Let's continue to share, butRead More face-to-face." Thx - Sonny
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 06:06 am
Thanks, Jon - you raise important considerations and in a calm, dispassionate way, which IRead More appreciate. As for alternative funding mechanisms, in hindsight I believe they should have been examined and addressed this earlier this year had the decision-making been opened up to the public in a completely bidirectional manner much earlier in this year's budget cycle. A real take-away from this situation, in my opinion, is that we in the community were not given the opportunity to sit down together with sharpened pencils in a public forum and allowed to vet and actually challenge the Administration's assumptions in order to arrive at budget alternatives with the Administration and Board. The comparison you make with Washington is indeed apt in that it reflects the way decisions have slid back to being made in a vacuum and handed down to the voters instead of in a democratic fashion based on budget-to-actuals instead of budget-to-budget figures combined with the practice of over-reserving for expense items while under-estimating revenues. Although the Board did indeed reach out to me and 2 others asking for suggestions, when we re-iterated our request for an open meeting format to include other financially savvy community members, these requests were consistently ignored. Which is why we are in the current position we are in having to decide on Tues on a tax levy cap-busting budget requiring 60% super-majority. Which the public will decide, of course, and we will live with the consequences: either it passes, or the Board and Administration will be forced to rein in the excesses. And much as I love open debate, I restate that online posting leaves does leave a lot to be desired. Let's continue to share, but not face-to-face. Respectfully - Sonny
JanFisher May 17, 2013 at 10:55 pm
It is so wonderful that, recognizing the importance of STEM and following the recommendation of ourRead More educators, Sal Maglietta and Jon Satran agreed to bring on the district's first director of instructional technology.
McKey Rivers May 10, 2013 at 07:36 pm
Thank you Dr. Sternberg for your thoughtful letter. You hit on an important facet of this electionRead More few if any others have stated: electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder will provide the added benefit of diversity of thought as the Board continues to address difficult, ongoing educational and financial issues. There is a woeful absence of synergy produced by articulation of different views among the current Board members. The absence of a “check and balance” on the current Board is reflected in the inexplicable decision to cancel the May 13 BOE meeting (scheduled since last summer), which is the last meeting prior to the May 21 budget vote and board election. Is there no business for the Board to conduct at this critical juncture or could it be that the Board does not want Briarcliff residents to hear members of the community question the Board about the proposed budget right before the election? Electing either Mr. Linder and/or Mr. Wasserman will immediately benefit the public as the highest vote getter will be seated on May 22 and thus participate in formulating a second budget for public vote that, notwithstanding current BOE scare tactics, can be tax levy compliant and not involve additional program elimination or reduction. There is no doubt that electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder to the Briarcliff School Board will substantially benefit the entire Briarcliff community and provide a much needed check on Board decision making.
Herman Sexton May 10, 2013 at 03:48 pm
Electing Paul Wasserman alone would add a diversity of thought. The guy hears at least a dozenRead More voices in his head. Have you ever spoken to him? Did you pay attention when he was running for Congress for a few weeks? Ugh.