.
Feedback

Pleasantville Organization Develops Playful Solution for Autistic Kids

Sensory playground will offer benefits for all children.

Playgrounds have come a long way in recent years. But the innovative playground of the future is about to arrive—in October, to be exact.

Access Nursing, headquartered in Pleasantville, is a comprehensive provider of professional health-care personnel that is about to usher playgrounds—and cognitive performance—into the 21st century.   

Its project, dubbed WeeZee—a world of “Yes, I Can”—includes the development of a state of the art facility that will include a creative sensory playground intended to enrich children’s social, athletic and intellectual development through sensory adventure.   

A brainstorm of their organization, WeeZee is founded on clinical research based on the occupational therapy world and sensory integration.

Access Nursing founder and president Louise Weadock explained, “We started this business years ago out of our apartment in Manhattan, when my daughter was diagnosed with an autistic-related disorder.”

After driving all over the country to obtain the resources to get that she needed Weadock, observed 75 percent of therapy time was spent desensitizing Shannon.

Weadock expanded, “Desensitization should be taken out of the doctor’s office and put in the playground"—by doing so, time with the doctor could be put to alternative use.

She continued, “Rather than waiting until the therapist's office to start therapy defensiveness, beginning the routine earlier will enhance performance.”

Weadock likened the intended gym regimen to that experienced by adults at a health club.

“Rather than using a trainer, an initial screening—sensory assessment—would determine the likes and dislikes of the child," she said.

Added Weadock, “Like a fitness routine outlined by a trainer, the assessment would lead to a particular ‘sensory diet’ or ‘sensory regime’. The kids would go to WeeZee to work on cognitive development, social relationships, and physical endurance."

The assessment can take any time throughout the therapy but “should be at least quarterly, for self-checking,” she said.

While the facility will greatly enrich the performance of children living with symptoms of Autism, ADHD, Turrets and Asperger’s Weadock pointed out, “All children would do well with this type of therapy…if the child can get into a gym at ages one, two or three you may not see the learning issues that start occurring at four, five and six.”

Weadock isn’t developing the concept on her own.  She has engaged the able assistance of talented local teens, employed as summer interns, to help.

Recent graduates Jessica Colton and Shannon Rowe—Weadock’s daughter—are part of a five-person internship team that work in the project’s “war room” to design the new facility. The interns are charged with developing the new space.

Colton and Rowe have visited and researched a variety of sensory gyms and museums, as well as hosting discussions with therapists, to determine what was working best or the kids.

The most effective therapies will be incorporated into the new spac—and under one roof.

Colton explained, “We’re coming up with ideas for the sensory gym, buzzwords for the website that that best describe what we’re offering…going to different places to shop for equipment that we would like to use and that would be interesting to kids for all ages.”

Rowe finds the work particularly rewarding, “I’m learning more of what I had to go through…I remember what I did as a kid…but didn’t understand why we were doing it or how it helped. Now, it’s interesting to see how differently someone can develop from a facility like WeeZee. When I was younger there weren’t that many facilities out there, so we had to travel from New York to Washington, D.C...in and out of so many different places and doctor’s offices. “   

“After the internship, I’m probably going to study to be an occupational therapist and help kids with the leaning issues that I have,” she added.

Interns Paul Rowe, Colin O'Rourke and Colin Coogan aslo play a major role in WeeZee by developing the design, visuals and musical therapy components for the gym.

But, the facility will provide much than an indoor sensory playground.

The planned facility will include 10,000-square-feet of space with sections devoted to each of the senses. Therapy areas include, for example, a wind and rain room. How about a mosh pit and trampoline? A café, catering to the sense of taste, will be available as well and even a dedicated  place for parents–The ZEN Den. The den will be a spa-like area for relaxing...and learning.

There will also be 20 therapy offices, co-located in the facility, available for lease to various practitioners.

“This is going to be big...it’s the next McDonalds," quipped Weadock.

The facility is scheduled to open in October 2011 and will be located on Labriola Ct. in Armonk. Membership will initially be limited to 400 familes. More information can be obtained at www.weezeeworld.com

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lisa Jenner May 19, 2013 at 05:57 pm
I also agree with Mr. Venditti with his assessment that more money does not necessarily mean betterRead More education. The districts to which we like to compare ourselves outperform us in many areas, and they do so at a better cost. Our BOE and administrative team need to look at other districts and learn from them.
Lisa Jenner May 19, 2013 at 05:51 pm
I agree with Mr. Venditti regarding the tax burden in Briarcliff, and, as usual, I disagree with Mr.Read More Valenti. My oldest son, a Briarcliff High School graduate, has secured a job in Westchester and is looking to purchase his first home. Briarcliff is not even in the running for him, because the taxes are so high. He is looking in nearby communities where the taxes are not so burdensome. While this story is anecdotal, it does support the statement that potential buyers steer clear of Briarcliff because of the taxes.
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 04:59 pm
Mr. Venditti and his crew are the same folks who sponsored the likes of Janet Marinaccio, GuyRead More Rotundo, Eric Bashford and Rosella Ranno. The community has spoken loud and clear in the last several elections as candidates sponsored by this group have been soundly defeated. The track records (and more importantly the comportment) of the aforementioned board members spoke volumes as to the agenda of this group. They are out of touch and out of clout. The community has made it clear that candidates sponsored by this group must never again control our school board. Continued...
robin May 20, 2013 at 06:44 am
If I may also point out that the "3 minute rule" was instituted by the previous board.Read More This same board also moved public comment to the beginning of the meeting. And while this may have worked well if you were a mind reader and knew what was going to be discussed, it makes far more sense to have public comment after presentations and board discussions. The current board, under the leadership of Sal Maglietta, has allowed for public comment multiple times in the same meeting. They are most certainly listening to what the community has to say. Please join me and my family in re-electing Jon Satran and Sal Maglietta. Please also join us in voting YES on the school budget.
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 09:31 pm
This year’s school budget is a REDUCTION in spending by the district versus last year’sRead More budget. We are the ONLY district in Westchester to forward a reduction for our community to vote on. The reason we will slightly violate the tax-cap is due to the fiscal irresponsibility of a prior board using fund balance to cushion the budget and create the illusion of a cap-compliant budget. Please join me in re-electing Jon Satran and Sal Maglietta. Please also join me in voting YES on this year’s school budget.
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 09:30 pm
Mr. Venditti and his crew are the same folks who sponsored the likes of Janet Marinaccio, GuyRead More Rotundo, Eric Bashford and Rosella Ranno. The community has spoken loud and clear in the last several elections as candidates sponsored by this group have been soundly defeated. The track records (and more importantly the comportment) of the aforementioned board members spoke volumes as to the agenda of this group. They are out of touch and out of clout. The community has made it clear that candidates sponsored by this group must never again control our school board. The damage done by the prior BOE majority has begun a cycle of meaningful healing under the current BOE majority. Continued...
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 09:40 pm
The damage done by the prior BOE majority has begun a cycle of meaningful healing under the currentRead More BOE majority. Please join me in re-electing Jon Satran and Sal Maglietta. Please also join me in voting YES on this year’s school budget.
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 09:39 pm
Mr. Rubich and his crew are the same folks who sponsored the likes of Janet Marinaccio, Guy Rotundo,Read More Eric Bashford and Rosella Ranno. The community has spoken loud and clear in the last several elections as candidates sponsored by this group have been soundly defeated. The track records (and more importantly the comportment) of the aforementioned board members spoke volumes as to the agenda of this group. They are out of touch and out of clout. The community has made it clear that candidates sponsored by this group must never again control our school board. Continued...
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 09:38 pm
While I respect Mr. Rubich's right to voice his alternative point of view, it is hardly objective asRead More he clearly states that his purpose is to illicit votes for the imploding campaign of Paul Wasserman and Louis Linder. Mr. Rubich's encouragement that the community vote down the school budget further tarnishes his judgement and credibility. Continued...
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 02:53 pm
Mr. Linder, This is YOUR post folks are responding to and your ideas. I find it curious at bestRead More that you began a public forum comment blog but advocate throughout your responses that the discussion should be taken off-line and out of public view. this really doesn't position you well as an advocate for transparency.
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 05:07 pm
CORRECTION TO LAST POST: The last sentence should read: "Let's continue to share, butRead More face-to-face." Thx - Sonny
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 06:06 am
Thanks, Jon - you raise important considerations and in a calm, dispassionate way, which IRead More appreciate. As for alternative funding mechanisms, in hindsight I believe they should have been examined and addressed this earlier this year had the decision-making been opened up to the public in a completely bidirectional manner much earlier in this year's budget cycle. A real take-away from this situation, in my opinion, is that we in the community were not given the opportunity to sit down together with sharpened pencils in a public forum and allowed to vet and actually challenge the Administration's assumptions in order to arrive at budget alternatives with the Administration and Board. The comparison you make with Washington is indeed apt in that it reflects the way decisions have slid back to being made in a vacuum and handed down to the voters instead of in a democratic fashion based on budget-to-actuals instead of budget-to-budget figures combined with the practice of over-reserving for expense items while under-estimating revenues. Although the Board did indeed reach out to me and 2 others asking for suggestions, when we re-iterated our request for an open meeting format to include other financially savvy community members, these requests were consistently ignored. Which is why we are in the current position we are in having to decide on Tues on a tax levy cap-busting budget requiring 60% super-majority. Which the public will decide, of course, and we will live with the consequences: either it passes, or the Board and Administration will be forced to rein in the excesses. And much as I love open debate, I restate that online posting leaves does leave a lot to be desired. Let's continue to share, but not face-to-face. Respectfully - Sonny
JanFisher May 17, 2013 at 10:55 pm
It is so wonderful that, recognizing the importance of STEM and following the recommendation of ourRead More educators, Sal Maglietta and Jon Satran agreed to bring on the district's first director of instructional technology.
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 09:53 pm
BOTH JON AND SAL have demonstrated as BOE trustees their unwavering commitment to EDUCATIONALRead More EXCELLENCE, FISCAL PRUDENCE, TRANSPARENCY, RESPECT, COMMUNITY VOICE, COLLABORATION, CIVILITY and MUCH MORE. JON AND SAL’s record speaks for itself. Their comportment during this campaign reinforces that THEY embody the QUALITIES and SKILL-SET to continue to represent US and OUR school district. Under the CURRENT BOE’s leadership, our district has restored levels of TRANSPARENCY, RESPECT, COMMUNITY VOICE, COLLABORATION and MORALE that had deteriorated substantially under the previous BOE majority. They have done this while also maintaining extreme fiscal prudence (we are the ONLY district in the County to produce a year over year budget reduction for our community to vote on) and while making decisions ONLY after having ALL of the FACTS and listening to ALL constituencies. THE FACT OF THE MATTER is that JON AND SAL deserve BOTH of YOUR votes on Tuesday, as does the budget.
McKey Rivers May 10, 2013 at 07:36 pm
Thank you Dr. Sternberg for your thoughtful letter. You hit on an important facet of this electionRead More few if any others have stated: electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder will provide the added benefit of diversity of thought as the Board continues to address difficult, ongoing educational and financial issues. There is a woeful absence of synergy produced by articulation of different views among the current Board members. The absence of a “check and balance” on the current Board is reflected in the inexplicable decision to cancel the May 13 BOE meeting (scheduled since last summer), which is the last meeting prior to the May 21 budget vote and board election. Is there no business for the Board to conduct at this critical juncture or could it be that the Board does not want Briarcliff residents to hear members of the community question the Board about the proposed budget right before the election? Electing either Mr. Linder and/or Mr. Wasserman will immediately benefit the public as the highest vote getter will be seated on May 22 and thus participate in formulating a second budget for public vote that, notwithstanding current BOE scare tactics, can be tax levy compliant and not involve additional program elimination or reduction. There is no doubt that electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder to the Briarcliff School Board will substantially benefit the entire Briarcliff community and provide a much needed check on Board decision making.
Herman Sexton May 10, 2013 at 03:48 pm
Electing Paul Wasserman alone would add a diversity of thought. The guy hears at least a dozenRead More voices in his head. Have you ever spoken to him? Did you pay attention when he was running for Congress for a few weeks? Ugh.