.
Feedback

This Halloween: Bigger 'Blaze' Coming to Westchester

The organizers of Croton-on-Hudson's "Blaze" are preparing for a Halloween spectacular.

Just when you thought Croton-on-Hudson's "Blaze" couldn't get any bigger, organizers have topped themselves, once again.

This year's "Blaze" will feature a new attraction called "Little Monsters." The display will feature carved Halloween icons, such as Frankenstein and Dracula, with big heads and tiny two-foot-tall bodies. But that's just the beginning of the new attractions for 2012.

"We have a number of new and exciting installations this year that will bring movement to "Blaze," such as 10-foot-tall working 'jack o'lanterns-in-the-box,' floating pumpkin ghosts, and a 19th-century grandfather 'doomsday' clock, a cheeky reference to the Mayan prediction that the world will end in 2012," said Historic Hudson Valley's Director of Public Relations Rob Schweitzer.

"The Great Jack O' Lantern Blaze" is home to more than 5,000 illuminated and individually carved pumpkins. Last year more than 80,000 people flocked to Croton-on-Hudson to check out the Halloween spectacular. When people come this year, there will be some amazing, original ear candy.

"We are also extremely excited about "Blaze: The Soundtrack," more than 60 minutes of ethereal pumpkin viewing music created by professional musician, radio personality and Halloween fanatic Richard Christy," said Schweitzer.

The event is run by Historic Hudson Valley, which is a nonprofit education and preservation organization. The event began in 2005 when Historic Hudson Valley started looking for a new Halloween-related event to hold, as people already associated so called "Sleepy Hollow Country" with the beginnings of Halloween (as many associate Salem, MA with the holiday). From there, the organization started kicking around the idea of a display of jack-o-lanterns. The idea was then handed off to Historic Hudson Valley employee Michael Natiello, who still spearheads the displays to this day. But Natiello can't do it alone, as it takes a large number of volunteers to make the event happen.

"Blaze is truly a community event," said Schweitzer. "More than 1,000 volunteers help us throughout the course of its six-week run…The proceeds from Blaze help us further our mission."

Here is a breakdown of all of Historic Hudson Valley's Halloween-related offerings courtesy of HHV:

For Blaze, Horseman’s Hollow, and Irving’s ‘Legend,’ admissions are by advance purchase timed ticket.

Blaze dates are Oct. 6-8, 12-14, 19-21, 25-31, Nov. 2-4, 9-11. The first reservation is 7 p.m. on Oct. 6-8 and 6:30 p.m. for the other dates. Tickets are $16 for adults ($20 on Saturdays), $12 for children 3-17 ($16 on Saturdays), and free for children under 3 and Historic Hudson Valley members.

Horseman’s Hollow dates are Oct. 6-7, 13-14, 19-21, and 25-28, with the first reservation at 7 p.m. Tickets are $20 ($25 on Saturdays). Historic Hudson Valley members receive a $5 per ticket discount.

Irving’s ‘Legend’ dates are Oct. 6-8, 12-14, 19-21, and 26-28. Seating is very limited, and there are three performances each evening on the hour (four on Saturday), beginning at either 5pm or 6:15pm, depending on the evening. Tickets are $16 for adults, $12 for children under 18. Historic Hudson Valley members receive a $5 per ticket discount.

Legend Celebration dates are Oct. 6-8, 13-14, 20-21, and 27-28, from 10-4 p.m. Tickets are $14 for adults, $12 for seniors, $6 for children 3-17, and free for those under 3 and Historic Hudson Valley members.

Buy tickets online at www.hudsonvalley.org or by calling 914-366-6900 ($2 per ticket surcharge for phone orders).

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 05:07 pm
CORRECTION TO LAST POST: The last sentence should read: "Let's continue to share, butRead More face-to-face." Thx - Sonny
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 06:06 am
Thanks, Jon - you raise important considerations and in a calm, dispassionate way, which IRead More appreciate. As for alternative funding mechanisms, in hindsight I believe they should have been examined and addressed this earlier this year had the decision-making been opened up to the public in a completely bidirectional manner much earlier in this year's budget cycle. A real take-away from this situation, in my opinion, is that we in the community were not given the opportunity to sit down together with sharpened pencils in a public forum and allowed to vet and actually challenge the Administration's assumptions in order to arrive at budget alternatives with the Administration and Board. The comparison you make with Washington is indeed apt in that it reflects the way decisions have slid back to being made in a vacuum and handed down to the voters instead of in a democratic fashion based on budget-to-actuals instead of budget-to-budget figures combined with the practice of over-reserving for expense items while under-estimating revenues. Although the Board did indeed reach out to me and 2 others asking for suggestions, when we re-iterated our request for an open meeting format to include other financially savvy community members, these requests were consistently ignored. Which is why we are in the current position we are in having to decide on Tues on a tax levy cap-busting budget requiring 60% super-majority. Which the public will decide, of course, and we will live with the consequences: either it passes, or the Board and Administration will be forced to rein in the excesses. And much as I love open debate, I restate that online posting leaves does leave a lot to be desired. Let's continue to share, but not face-to-face. Respectfully - Sonny
Jon Satran May 18, 2013 at 12:16 am
Sonny, I like the idea of brainstorming together, thinking outside of the box, but there are someRead More major obstacles that I think you need to consider: 1) A Bond referendum requires a 45 days’ notice period. It cannot be presented for a vote before this year's budget process is concluded. 2) To release reserves based on the hope that a future bond vote would be successful is reckless. What happens if reserves are released and then the bond referendum fails? You would not risk your home finances with this type of risk, would you really risk your school’s financial health? 3) Our tax certiorari reserve was just recently reviewed in consultation with our attorneys and we are appropriately reserved for today’s commercial real estate market. 4) Most importantly, this proposal would create a larger and tougher tax increase next year. In other words, adding $1,000,000 of revenue this year through a loan would require replacing that revenue with an additional $1,000,000 again next year and the year after. Borrow and spend economics does not work as we have seen from the national level. Deficit spending, which has been suggested may or may not work in Washington, but it certainly does not in Briarcliff Manor. When the school’s reserves are exhausted, we will face impactful program cuts or much larger tax levy increases. Respectfully - Jon Satran
JanFisher May 17, 2013 at 10:55 pm
It is so wonderful that, recognizing the importance of STEM and following the recommendation of ourRead More educators, Sal Maglietta and Jon Satran agreed to bring on the district's first director of instructional technology.
McKey Rivers May 10, 2013 at 07:36 pm
Thank you Dr. Sternberg for your thoughtful letter. You hit on an important facet of this electionRead More few if any others have stated: electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder will provide the added benefit of diversity of thought as the Board continues to address difficult, ongoing educational and financial issues. There is a woeful absence of synergy produced by articulation of different views among the current Board members. The absence of a “check and balance” on the current Board is reflected in the inexplicable decision to cancel the May 13 BOE meeting (scheduled since last summer), which is the last meeting prior to the May 21 budget vote and board election. Is there no business for the Board to conduct at this critical juncture or could it be that the Board does not want Briarcliff residents to hear members of the community question the Board about the proposed budget right before the election? Electing either Mr. Linder and/or Mr. Wasserman will immediately benefit the public as the highest vote getter will be seated on May 22 and thus participate in formulating a second budget for public vote that, notwithstanding current BOE scare tactics, can be tax levy compliant and not involve additional program elimination or reduction. There is no doubt that electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder to the Briarcliff School Board will substantially benefit the entire Briarcliff community and provide a much needed check on Board decision making.
Herman Sexton May 10, 2013 at 03:48 pm
Electing Paul Wasserman alone would add a diversity of thought. The guy hears at least a dozenRead More voices in his head. Have you ever spoken to him? Did you pay attention when he was running for Congress for a few weeks? Ugh.