.
Feedback

Women with Breast Cancer have Improved Reconstruction Options

Women facing breast cancer have mastectomy and reconstruction options they may not know about, including procedures that shorten surgical procedure time with excellent results.

By C. Andrew Salzberg, MD, New York Group for Plastic Surgery

Breast cancer gets a lot of attention during October’s Awareness Month, but women are diagnosed every day, all year long. Many aren’t aware of their surgical options for cancer removal or breast reconstruction. I’ll provide an overview, but keep in mind that chemotherapy or radiation will play a part in surgical treatment decisions for some women. 

Many women with breast cancer can keep, or preserve, their breast by having a lumpectomy. We remove the tumor (“lump”) and an area of surrounding healthy breast tissue. Tumor removal can cause a breast indentation, or the two breasts can appear asymmetrical (uneven). We then use nearby healthy breast tissue to fill the indentation, and sometimes reduce (make smaller) the unaffected breast to match up size and shape. (Note that radiation treatments are almost always required after lumpectomy to destroy any remaining potential cancer cells.)

Mastectomy, on the other hand, is complete removal of breast tissue. Breast reconstruction procedures have improved enormously over the decades, and can result in breasts that look very natural. Most often we can preserve and fill the breast skin to create the new breasts. In fact, a woman whose cancer is located far enough from the nipple area may be eligible for “nipple-sparing” mastectomy; the nipple is never surgically removed from the breast at all.

Breast reconstruction is most frequently performed in multiple procedures using implants. After mastectomy, a deflated balloon-like device called a “tissue expander” is put in the breast and filled with salt water over three to six months until the preferred size is achieved. A second surgery is required to put in the permanent implant.

To avoid this lengthy and uncomfortable expander process, and enable a woman to wake from mastectomy with breasts in place, I developed a new method of reconstructive surgery called “Direct-to-Implant” or referred to as "One-Step." With this procedure, we put a permanent implant in the breast immediately following the mastectomy. Simply put, we use a specially prepared tissue material that makes a space for the implant without having to use tissue expanders. There is no months-long filling process or need for a second surgery.

Another mastectomy breast reconstruction option is using microsurgery to transfer a woman’s own skin, fat and muscle from her abdomen, buttocks, back, thigh or hip to form the breasts. This procedure is commonly referred to as a “free tissue flap” or “DIEP.” This surgery is complex and has a longer recovery time than using implants, but results in breasts that look and feel very natural.

I’d like to offer some tips for women facing cancer-related breast reconstruction:

  • Do your homework: Gather information on types of mastectomy and breast reconstruction procedures and surgeons that perform them. Talk to other women about their experiences. Read discussion boards on support group websites. Find information on medical websites or journals.
  • If a surgeon says you’re not eligible for a certain type of surgery, there may be a valid reason OR it may be that he/she doesn’t perform that surgery. Find a surgeon with expertise in the procedure, and be sure to ask how many they’ve done.
  • Ask the surgeon to show you patient before-and-after photos, and not just successful cases. A skilled, confident surgeon will also show you cases that did not have ideal results, and explain why not.
  • Get a second opinion to find a procedure and surgeon that feels right for you; insurance will usually cover a second opinion.
  • Insist on great results and do not compromise, as breast reconstruction can help make you feel “whole” again. If your breast or general surgeon tells you to wait until later for reconstruction, make a plastic surgery consult with a board certified (ASPS) surgeon to explore the option of immediate reconstruction.

Dr. C. Andrew Salzberg, a board certified plastic and reconstructive surgeon, is Associate Professor at NY Medical College and Chief of Plastic Surgery at Westchester Medical Center and St. John's Riverside Hospital at Dobbs Ferry Pavilion. He also operates at the Institute for Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery within the Hudson Valley Hospital Center and at The Mt. Sinai Hospital Center in New York City. He is a partner with the New York Group for Plastic Surgery. http://www.nygplasticsurgery.com

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 05:07 pm
CORRECTION TO LAST POST: The last sentence should read: "Let's continue to share, butRead More face-to-face." Thx - Sonny
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 06:06 am
Thanks, Jon - you raise important considerations and in a calm, dispassionate way, which IRead More appreciate. As for alternative funding mechanisms, in hindsight I believe they should have been examined and addressed this earlier this year had the decision-making been opened up to the public in a completely bidirectional manner much earlier in this year's budget cycle. A real take-away from this situation, in my opinion, is that we in the community were not given the opportunity to sit down together with sharpened pencils in a public forum and allowed to vet and actually challenge the Administration's assumptions in order to arrive at budget alternatives with the Administration and Board. The comparison you make with Washington is indeed apt in that it reflects the way decisions have slid back to being made in a vacuum and handed down to the voters instead of in a democratic fashion based on budget-to-actuals instead of budget-to-budget figures combined with the practice of over-reserving for expense items while under-estimating revenues. Although the Board did indeed reach out to me and 2 others asking for suggestions, when we re-iterated our request for an open meeting format to include other financially savvy community members, these requests were consistently ignored. Which is why we are in the current position we are in having to decide on Tues on a tax levy cap-busting budget requiring 60% super-majority. Which the public will decide, of course, and we will live with the consequences: either it passes, or the Board and Administration will be forced to rein in the excesses. And much as I love open debate, I restate that online posting leaves does leave a lot to be desired. Let's continue to share, but not face-to-face. Respectfully - Sonny
Jon Satran May 18, 2013 at 12:16 am
Sonny, I like the idea of brainstorming together, thinking outside of the box, but there are someRead More major obstacles that I think you need to consider: 1) A Bond referendum requires a 45 days’ notice period. It cannot be presented for a vote before this year's budget process is concluded. 2) To release reserves based on the hope that a future bond vote would be successful is reckless. What happens if reserves are released and then the bond referendum fails? You would not risk your home finances with this type of risk, would you really risk your school’s financial health? 3) Our tax certiorari reserve was just recently reviewed in consultation with our attorneys and we are appropriately reserved for today’s commercial real estate market. 4) Most importantly, this proposal would create a larger and tougher tax increase next year. In other words, adding $1,000,000 of revenue this year through a loan would require replacing that revenue with an additional $1,000,000 again next year and the year after. Borrow and spend economics does not work as we have seen from the national level. Deficit spending, which has been suggested may or may not work in Washington, but it certainly does not in Briarcliff Manor. When the school’s reserves are exhausted, we will face impactful program cuts or much larger tax levy increases. Respectfully - Jon Satran
JanFisher May 17, 2013 at 10:55 pm
It is so wonderful that, recognizing the importance of STEM and following the recommendation of ourRead More educators, Sal Maglietta and Jon Satran agreed to bring on the district's first director of instructional technology.
McKey Rivers May 10, 2013 at 07:36 pm
Thank you Dr. Sternberg for your thoughtful letter. You hit on an important facet of this electionRead More few if any others have stated: electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder will provide the added benefit of diversity of thought as the Board continues to address difficult, ongoing educational and financial issues. There is a woeful absence of synergy produced by articulation of different views among the current Board members. The absence of a “check and balance” on the current Board is reflected in the inexplicable decision to cancel the May 13 BOE meeting (scheduled since last summer), which is the last meeting prior to the May 21 budget vote and board election. Is there no business for the Board to conduct at this critical juncture or could it be that the Board does not want Briarcliff residents to hear members of the community question the Board about the proposed budget right before the election? Electing either Mr. Linder and/or Mr. Wasserman will immediately benefit the public as the highest vote getter will be seated on May 22 and thus participate in formulating a second budget for public vote that, notwithstanding current BOE scare tactics, can be tax levy compliant and not involve additional program elimination or reduction. There is no doubt that electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder to the Briarcliff School Board will substantially benefit the entire Briarcliff community and provide a much needed check on Board decision making.
Herman Sexton May 10, 2013 at 03:48 pm
Electing Paul Wasserman alone would add a diversity of thought. The guy hears at least a dozenRead More voices in his head. Have you ever spoken to him? Did you pay attention when he was running for Congress for a few weeks? Ugh.