.
Feedback

Meet the Briarcliff Mayoral Candidate: Laura S. Morris

Morris is challenging current Mayor William Vescio in Tuesday's village election.

Laura S. Morris is one of two candidates vying for the position of mayor in Briarcliff Manor in the Tuesday, March 19 village election.

View her responses to Patch's Q&A below.

Click here to read more about Tuesday's election.

Background

Full Name: Laura S. Morris

Party Affiliation: Briarcliff (I went independent because my mother just passed away and I wanted to make sure I could honestly dedicate myself to serving Briarcliff as Mayor. As a result, I missed all the People's Caucus deadlines.)

Number of year living in village: Whole life, I was born and raised here.  I am a life long resident. My family came to Briarcliff 100 years ago.

Occupation: Marketing Director for Sterling Global Technologies and President of Pace Alumni of Westchester (PANet)

Examples of community involvement: Board member of the Salvation Army in New York city for 11 years. Served on the board and finance committee of a Briarcliff church. Researcher at Ossining Historical Society. Over 25 years, member of the NISS (National Institute of Social Sciences) and World Affairs Forum. Member of Riverkeeper.

Why are you running and why should residents vote for you? Briarcliff is at a cross roads in our history and have financial decisions to make that will effect future generations (i.e. Briarcliff becoming independent and annexation). My family has been in Briarcliff for a 100 years. I have a great passion and love for Briarcliff. I believe with my extensive corporate and community background, I can bring a lot to the table.

Issues

Would you be in favor of the potential annexation of Ossining Election Districts 17 and 20? Why or why not? Like any important decision of this magnitude, it is a decision for the whole town. It is not a decision for one person. Nor a decision for a few. It is a decision for all. All Briarcliff residents jointly decide Briarcliff's future. But before anyone can make a decision, we need to know the basics. What is the cost/effect on taxes?  What impact does it have on schools (I graduate from Briarcliff High school of a class of 100 students). What is the impact on the resources of Briarcliff's Police, fire/ambulance. Like in business, we need to know best and worst case scenario. In business, I work as a team. I would speak with the police and fire to hear their critical input. Same with the school leaders. Afterwards, the information would be distributed to all of Briarcliff. Then hold town meetings to hear the residents input. Also speak with the high school seniors for their input, for they are the future of Briarcliff. 

Are there any other major issues you hope to address as trustee if elected?

— increase community involvement in decision process for key issues.

— term limits on village officials—this will ensure a strong government with continual infusion of new ideas and expertise

—a designated warming center

—making our buildings self sufficient

—cost containment

___

Editor's Note: Any questions not answered by the candidate were omitted from this article.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 05:07 pm
CORRECTION TO LAST POST: The last sentence should read: "Let's continue to share, butRead More face-to-face." Thx - Sonny
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 06:06 am
Thanks, Jon - you raise important considerations and in a calm, dispassionate way, which IRead More appreciate. As for alternative funding mechanisms, in hindsight I believe they should have been examined and addressed this earlier this year had the decision-making been opened up to the public in a completely bidirectional manner much earlier in this year's budget cycle. A real take-away from this situation, in my opinion, is that we in the community were not given the opportunity to sit down together with sharpened pencils in a public forum and allowed to vet and actually challenge the Administration's assumptions in order to arrive at budget alternatives with the Administration and Board. The comparison you make with Washington is indeed apt in that it reflects the way decisions have slid back to being made in a vacuum and handed down to the voters instead of in a democratic fashion based on budget-to-actuals instead of budget-to-budget figures combined with the practice of over-reserving for expense items while under-estimating revenues. Although the Board did indeed reach out to me and 2 others asking for suggestions, when we re-iterated our request for an open meeting format to include other financially savvy community members, these requests were consistently ignored. Which is why we are in the current position we are in having to decide on Tues on a tax levy cap-busting budget requiring 60% super-majority. Which the public will decide, of course, and we will live with the consequences: either it passes, or the Board and Administration will be forced to rein in the excesses. And much as I love open debate, I restate that online posting leaves does leave a lot to be desired. Let's continue to share, but not face-to-face. Respectfully - Sonny
Jon Satran May 18, 2013 at 12:16 am
Sonny, I like the idea of brainstorming together, thinking outside of the box, but there are someRead More major obstacles that I think you need to consider: 1) A Bond referendum requires a 45 days’ notice period. It cannot be presented for a vote before this year's budget process is concluded. 2) To release reserves based on the hope that a future bond vote would be successful is reckless. What happens if reserves are released and then the bond referendum fails? You would not risk your home finances with this type of risk, would you really risk your school’s financial health? 3) Our tax certiorari reserve was just recently reviewed in consultation with our attorneys and we are appropriately reserved for today’s commercial real estate market. 4) Most importantly, this proposal would create a larger and tougher tax increase next year. In other words, adding $1,000,000 of revenue this year through a loan would require replacing that revenue with an additional $1,000,000 again next year and the year after. Borrow and spend economics does not work as we have seen from the national level. Deficit spending, which has been suggested may or may not work in Washington, but it certainly does not in Briarcliff Manor. When the school’s reserves are exhausted, we will face impactful program cuts or much larger tax levy increases. Respectfully - Jon Satran
JanFisher May 17, 2013 at 10:55 pm
It is so wonderful that, recognizing the importance of STEM and following the recommendation of ourRead More educators, Sal Maglietta and Jon Satran agreed to bring on the district's first director of instructional technology.
McKey Rivers May 10, 2013 at 07:36 pm
Thank you Dr. Sternberg for your thoughtful letter. You hit on an important facet of this electionRead More few if any others have stated: electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder will provide the added benefit of diversity of thought as the Board continues to address difficult, ongoing educational and financial issues. There is a woeful absence of synergy produced by articulation of different views among the current Board members. The absence of a “check and balance” on the current Board is reflected in the inexplicable decision to cancel the May 13 BOE meeting (scheduled since last summer), which is the last meeting prior to the May 21 budget vote and board election. Is there no business for the Board to conduct at this critical juncture or could it be that the Board does not want Briarcliff residents to hear members of the community question the Board about the proposed budget right before the election? Electing either Mr. Linder and/or Mr. Wasserman will immediately benefit the public as the highest vote getter will be seated on May 22 and thus participate in formulating a second budget for public vote that, notwithstanding current BOE scare tactics, can be tax levy compliant and not involve additional program elimination or reduction. There is no doubt that electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder to the Briarcliff School Board will substantially benefit the entire Briarcliff community and provide a much needed check on Board decision making.
Herman Sexton May 10, 2013 at 03:48 pm
Electing Paul Wasserman alone would add a diversity of thought. The guy hears at least a dozenRead More voices in his head. Have you ever spoken to him? Did you pay attention when he was running for Congress for a few weeks? Ugh.