.
Feedback

Please Let Us In!

You want to sell your house? Great! But in order to get the job done, can you please let us in to see it?

Do you want to for the highest possible price as quickly as possible? The only way to do that is to get as many buyers as possible to come into your home to view it–lots and lots of them. This means many strangers will be walking through the home, and that thought can be very disconcerting.

Most people don’t like the idea of having lots of people they’ve never met come through their house looking in every nook and cranny. But, while it might be trying on anyone’s sanity, it’s the only way to ensure that a seller will get the most money for their home.

Although the market is finally beginning to signs of improvements, housing is still not where it was a few years ago. Buyers are taking much longer to make decisions on which homes they are interested in, and they enjoy visiting the same home several times to help them finally pull that trigger. Sellers must be willing to allow as many showings as possible because of this.

It's difficult to sell a house that can't be shown. Sellers need to strike a balance between accommodating buyers and preserving parts of their lifestyle, which can understandably be difficult. If a buyer wants to come on short notice at a time that's inconvenient, sellers should ask if it's possible to reschedule. However, keep in mind that some of the best buyers are relocating from elsewhere and may not have much flexibility in their schedule.

Recently, I came across a listing where all appointments needed to be accompanied by the listing agent. For those of you who are not familiar with what this means, this is when the buyer’s agent is required to meet the listing agent every time there is a showing on a house. If the buyer’s agent is showing several homes that day, which is highly likely, it will take a lot of juggling to get that appointment just right.

A typical showing appointment for homes tends to be a one-hour window. If an agent feels they can be at the house anytime between 10am-11am, that is the scheduled time. However, no listing agent wants to wait one hour at a house for another agent and their client’s to get there, especially if they have their own clients waiting to see homes. To get around this, a buyer’s agent will often call the listing agent about 15 minutes prior to arriving. However, trouble can still arise.

Sometimes, the buyer’s agent is running late. When scheduling a list of home tours, we all pretty much guess how long buyers will take to view each house. But if suddenly a buyer takes 30 minutes instead of 20 to see each house, the schedule is severely thrown off track. And, instead of meeting the agent at 10:30am, we must now re-schedule and meet them at 11am, in turn throwing the other agent off their schedule as well.

Unfortunately, there are some agents who hate the thought of accompanied showings so much, they may decide their schedule does not allow for it and skip the house completely. Statistics show that homes that require accompanied showings take longer to sell than those which do not rely on agent accompaniments.

Other seller requirements can also make showings extremely difficult. Do you need 24-hours notice before my buyers can enter your home? We might have to leave your home off our tour if my buyers popped up at the last minute with a request to see some houses.

It’s completely understandable to request a certain amount of notice before someone wants to pop in to show your house. A seller needs to make sure it is clean (check my last article for tips), and they probably want to make sure they are out of the house. With notice, things can be organized and quickly put away. However, requiring 24 hours worth of notice actually turns many buyers off because a majority of them make the decision to see in a home in less time than that.

Trying to sell a house while juggling the schedule of children can also be extremely difficult. Some parents have made the decision to not upset their children who are unhappy about the move by preventing any showings after school hours and weekends- I kid you not. Statistically, the most popular showing days are the weekends, and for good reason. Most people don’t work on a Saturday or Sunday, and it is the only free time they have available to view homes. Eliminating two of the most popular days of the week to tour your home severely limits the number of buyers who will be able to view it, and ultimately, buy it.

Some homes are better with allowing showings all seven days of the week, but still limit the hours. For instance, one home had allowable showing times only between 10am-2pm, seven days per week. Those are extremely difficult hours for people who work.

Selling a home while you're living in it can be trying during any market. Today's sellers are generally looking at a longer marketing time than was the case a few years ago. In addition to appropriate pricing, being flexible on showing times will help them gain the best rewards.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 05:07 pm
CORRECTION TO LAST POST: The last sentence should read: "Let's continue to share, butRead More face-to-face." Thx - Sonny
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 06:06 am
Thanks, Jon - you raise important considerations and in a calm, dispassionate way, which IRead More appreciate. As for alternative funding mechanisms, in hindsight I believe they should have been examined and addressed this earlier this year had the decision-making been opened up to the public in a completely bidirectional manner much earlier in this year's budget cycle. A real take-away from this situation, in my opinion, is that we in the community were not given the opportunity to sit down together with sharpened pencils in a public forum and allowed to vet and actually challenge the Administration's assumptions in order to arrive at budget alternatives with the Administration and Board. The comparison you make with Washington is indeed apt in that it reflects the way decisions have slid back to being made in a vacuum and handed down to the voters instead of in a democratic fashion based on budget-to-actuals instead of budget-to-budget figures combined with the practice of over-reserving for expense items while under-estimating revenues. Although the Board did indeed reach out to me and 2 others asking for suggestions, when we re-iterated our request for an open meeting format to include other financially savvy community members, these requests were consistently ignored. Which is why we are in the current position we are in having to decide on Tues on a tax levy cap-busting budget requiring 60% super-majority. Which the public will decide, of course, and we will live with the consequences: either it passes, or the Board and Administration will be forced to rein in the excesses. And much as I love open debate, I restate that online posting leaves does leave a lot to be desired. Let's continue to share, but not face-to-face. Respectfully - Sonny
Jon Satran May 18, 2013 at 12:16 am
Sonny, I like the idea of brainstorming together, thinking outside of the box, but there are someRead More major obstacles that I think you need to consider: 1) A Bond referendum requires a 45 days’ notice period. It cannot be presented for a vote before this year's budget process is concluded. 2) To release reserves based on the hope that a future bond vote would be successful is reckless. What happens if reserves are released and then the bond referendum fails? You would not risk your home finances with this type of risk, would you really risk your school’s financial health? 3) Our tax certiorari reserve was just recently reviewed in consultation with our attorneys and we are appropriately reserved for today’s commercial real estate market. 4) Most importantly, this proposal would create a larger and tougher tax increase next year. In other words, adding $1,000,000 of revenue this year through a loan would require replacing that revenue with an additional $1,000,000 again next year and the year after. Borrow and spend economics does not work as we have seen from the national level. Deficit spending, which has been suggested may or may not work in Washington, but it certainly does not in Briarcliff Manor. When the school’s reserves are exhausted, we will face impactful program cuts or much larger tax levy increases. Respectfully - Jon Satran
JanFisher May 17, 2013 at 10:55 pm
It is so wonderful that, recognizing the importance of STEM and following the recommendation of ourRead More educators, Sal Maglietta and Jon Satran agreed to bring on the district's first director of instructional technology.
McKey Rivers May 10, 2013 at 07:36 pm
Thank you Dr. Sternberg for your thoughtful letter. You hit on an important facet of this electionRead More few if any others have stated: electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder will provide the added benefit of diversity of thought as the Board continues to address difficult, ongoing educational and financial issues. There is a woeful absence of synergy produced by articulation of different views among the current Board members. The absence of a “check and balance” on the current Board is reflected in the inexplicable decision to cancel the May 13 BOE meeting (scheduled since last summer), which is the last meeting prior to the May 21 budget vote and board election. Is there no business for the Board to conduct at this critical juncture or could it be that the Board does not want Briarcliff residents to hear members of the community question the Board about the proposed budget right before the election? Electing either Mr. Linder and/or Mr. Wasserman will immediately benefit the public as the highest vote getter will be seated on May 22 and thus participate in formulating a second budget for public vote that, notwithstanding current BOE scare tactics, can be tax levy compliant and not involve additional program elimination or reduction. There is no doubt that electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder to the Briarcliff School Board will substantially benefit the entire Briarcliff community and provide a much needed check on Board decision making.
Herman Sexton May 10, 2013 at 03:48 pm
Electing Paul Wasserman alone would add a diversity of thought. The guy hears at least a dozenRead More voices in his head. Have you ever spoken to him? Did you pay attention when he was running for Congress for a few weeks? Ugh.