.
Feedback

Whose ‘Most Wonderful Time of the Year’ Is It?

Christmas decorations have begun to spread like ivy on houses, in storefront windows. But can everyone partake in the holiday?

My daughter said something very funny the other day. Let me set up the story by explaining (especially for readers who may not already know) that we are Jewish. My 6-year-old daughter is just beginning to understand differences and similarities, and what defines her in relation to her friends and the people we know. She’s also becoming more aware of her identity and role and the community groups important in her life—family, friends, classmates and now our synagogue congregation.

“Mom,” she said, “I’m really glad we celebrate Hanukkah, and not Christmas.”

“Really, sweets? Why do you feel that way?” I responded, thinking how grateful we could now be that some of her Sunday School experiences were kicking in and that she was really identifying with her culture and religion.

“Well, people who celebrate Christmas have a problem. If they’re bad and naughty, they don’t get presents. But if I’m bad, I can still get Hanukkah presents. I think I prefer celebrating Hanukkah.”

Oh, dear.

Actually more like, Oy vey!

While her father and I know we’re in for some scary years ahead with that one, she’s definitely got some wit for a 6-year-old. But her unintentional joke belied another sentiment:  she was compensating for her insecurity about being different.

How do I know? Because the thing she said after the ‘if-you’re-bad-you-still-get-presents’ line was this:  “I think I’m the only kid in my class who’s Jewish. Maybe I’m the only Jewish kid in the school.”

I know exactly how she’s feeling. When I was in first grade, like she is now, I really was the only Jewish child in a K-6 school. The. Only. One.

From the vantage point of a first grader, I can see how the sudden appearance of all things Christmas can make the occasional reminder of your subtle differences from almost everyone around you suddenly feel like a constant beacon announcing, ‘One of these things is not like the other—and that’s you!’

One of our challenges is also to help both our children understand their heritage from both sides—their father’s and mine. My husband isn’t Jewish but it’s what we practice in our home and it’s how we’re raising our children. Whenever we travel to see his family at Christmastime, we do celebrate Christmas with them.

But this is where I’ve tried to start to weave a narrative that works for our family and helps my daughter especially to integrate who she is with what celebrations she sees around her, and how—even when we don’t celebrate the Christmas holiday and traditions as part of our own religious practice—that doesn’t mean that we can’t celebrate it.

We can celebrate the traditions that our friends have when we participate with them. This year we’ve been invited to friends’ home on Christmas Eve. This family enjoys the Italian Christmas tradition of Festa dei sette pesci, or the Feast of the Seven Fishes. It will be a first for my family and we’ll revel in the joy of good friends opening their home to include us in their most meaningful of family holiday celebrations.

We can also celebrate a tradition that so often is associated with Christmas—that of opening our hearts to give assistance to the needier in our society. We have tried to incorporate community volunteering into our own family rituals at this time, and talk with our children about how the spirit of giving to others is such an important practice and belief, especially when we are so fortunate to have so much, especially at gift giving time.

What’s more, we can also celebrate by inviting non-Jews to celebrate Hanukkah with us. We often get jelly donuts and make potato latkes, and have friends join us in marking one of the eight nights of the Festival of Lights. By making it a moment to enjoy with those we care about, our kids will hopefully look past the material trappings that have come to define the holidays and remember the spirit of the season.

Someone recently told me about how his children were just on the cusp of figuring out whether they thought Santa Claus was real or not. What he plans to tell them when they ever do stop believing is that Santa isn’t ‘just’ a person—it’s a spirit of generosity and joy, of giving and sharing. And who ever has to, or would want to stop believing in that?

So even though we may not celebrate Christmas as members of a religion that does, it doesn’t mean we have to stop celebrating it, or believing in what it stands for. Hopefully I can teach my children to celebrate their own heritage and traditions as well as how they can feel a part of the ever-present surroundings that remind them of the prevalence of Christmas.

And if it helps me convince my crafty, brilliant daughter that she still has to be good, that’s all the better!

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 05:07 pm
CORRECTION TO LAST POST: The last sentence should read: "Let's continue to share, butRead More face-to-face." Thx - Sonny
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 06:06 am
Thanks, Jon - you raise important considerations and in a calm, dispassionate way, which IRead More appreciate. As for alternative funding mechanisms, in hindsight I believe they should have been examined and addressed this earlier this year had the decision-making been opened up to the public in a completely bidirectional manner much earlier in this year's budget cycle. A real take-away from this situation, in my opinion, is that we in the community were not given the opportunity to sit down together with sharpened pencils in a public forum and allowed to vet and actually challenge the Administration's assumptions in order to arrive at budget alternatives with the Administration and Board. The comparison you make with Washington is indeed apt in that it reflects the way decisions have slid back to being made in a vacuum and handed down to the voters instead of in a democratic fashion based on budget-to-actuals instead of budget-to-budget figures combined with the practice of over-reserving for expense items while under-estimating revenues. Although the Board did indeed reach out to me and 2 others asking for suggestions, when we re-iterated our request for an open meeting format to include other financially savvy community members, these requests were consistently ignored. Which is why we are in the current position we are in having to decide on Tues on a tax levy cap-busting budget requiring 60% super-majority. Which the public will decide, of course, and we will live with the consequences: either it passes, or the Board and Administration will be forced to rein in the excesses. And much as I love open debate, I restate that online posting leaves does leave a lot to be desired. Let's continue to share, but not face-to-face. Respectfully - Sonny
Jon Satran May 18, 2013 at 12:16 am
Sonny, I like the idea of brainstorming together, thinking outside of the box, but there are someRead More major obstacles that I think you need to consider: 1) A Bond referendum requires a 45 days’ notice period. It cannot be presented for a vote before this year's budget process is concluded. 2) To release reserves based on the hope that a future bond vote would be successful is reckless. What happens if reserves are released and then the bond referendum fails? You would not risk your home finances with this type of risk, would you really risk your school’s financial health? 3) Our tax certiorari reserve was just recently reviewed in consultation with our attorneys and we are appropriately reserved for today’s commercial real estate market. 4) Most importantly, this proposal would create a larger and tougher tax increase next year. In other words, adding $1,000,000 of revenue this year through a loan would require replacing that revenue with an additional $1,000,000 again next year and the year after. Borrow and spend economics does not work as we have seen from the national level. Deficit spending, which has been suggested may or may not work in Washington, but it certainly does not in Briarcliff Manor. When the school’s reserves are exhausted, we will face impactful program cuts or much larger tax levy increases. Respectfully - Jon Satran
JanFisher May 17, 2013 at 10:55 pm
It is so wonderful that, recognizing the importance of STEM and following the recommendation of ourRead More educators, Sal Maglietta and Jon Satran agreed to bring on the district's first director of instructional technology.
McKey Rivers May 10, 2013 at 07:36 pm
Thank you Dr. Sternberg for your thoughtful letter. You hit on an important facet of this electionRead More few if any others have stated: electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder will provide the added benefit of diversity of thought as the Board continues to address difficult, ongoing educational and financial issues. There is a woeful absence of synergy produced by articulation of different views among the current Board members. The absence of a “check and balance” on the current Board is reflected in the inexplicable decision to cancel the May 13 BOE meeting (scheduled since last summer), which is the last meeting prior to the May 21 budget vote and board election. Is there no business for the Board to conduct at this critical juncture or could it be that the Board does not want Briarcliff residents to hear members of the community question the Board about the proposed budget right before the election? Electing either Mr. Linder and/or Mr. Wasserman will immediately benefit the public as the highest vote getter will be seated on May 22 and thus participate in formulating a second budget for public vote that, notwithstanding current BOE scare tactics, can be tax levy compliant and not involve additional program elimination or reduction. There is no doubt that electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder to the Briarcliff School Board will substantially benefit the entire Briarcliff community and provide a much needed check on Board decision making.
Herman Sexton May 10, 2013 at 03:48 pm
Electing Paul Wasserman alone would add a diversity of thought. The guy hears at least a dozenRead More voices in his head. Have you ever spoken to him? Did you pay attention when he was running for Congress for a few weeks? Ugh.