.
Feedback

Pleasantville Police Blotter: $1,500 Stolen from Apartment; Country Club Fencing Damaged

The following information was supplied by the Pleasantville Police Department. When arrests are noted, they do not indicate a conviction.

Here's a look at some of the incidents investigated by the  from July 4 – 10, 2011:

Sunday, July 10

5:25 p.m. – Police again (see below) responded to Pleasantville Country Club on a follow up, where an officer spoke with the complainant from the night before. The man said a fence was damaged and two sections of fencing were knocked off their posts. He also said a new section of the fence was damaged. Police took photos of the damage. The case remains open.

Saturday, July 9 

11:21 p.m. – A Nannahagan Road man called 911 to report youths using golf carts at the . He said upon arriving he saw three youth inside a maintenance fence attempting to remove a dumpster from the fenced-in area. He said in moving a maintenance cart, the youths damaged a section of the fence. Police canvassed the area with negative results.

10:31 a.m. – The police chief reported receiving a call from the village administrator during the . She stated a man was harassing people at and making a scene. The 44-year-old Yonkers man was interviewed by police and advised to leave the area. Police reported he eventually consented and went home.

Friday, July 8

9:27 a.m. – A Sunnyside Avenue resident reported there were wires down, caused by a truck, near 34 Sunnyside Ave. Another caller reported wires were also down in the area of 66 Sunnyside Ave. The responding officer reported the affected wires were for cable and telephone service. The homeowners were advised to contact their providers about the incident.

Thursday, July 7

7:36 p.mm. – A 911 caller reported someone had broken into the back window of his father's Bedford Road apartment. He stated someone had entered the apartment, which was missing $1,500. 

3:09 p.m. – A Pleasantville man came into headquarters and reported it appeared a vehicle backing out of a driveway on Bedford Road had severed a fire hydrant. The Water Department was notified.

Wednesday, July 6

3:15 p.m. – A Pleasantville woman called police to report her 12-year-old son had relayed to her that he had just been mugged in the breezeway by a man who took $10. Police arrested an 18-year-old Pleasantville man for robbery, assault and possession of stolen property shortly after. He on Tuesday.

Tuesday, July 5

6:23 p.m. – A Pleasantville man came into headquarters to report his black mountain bike was missing. He stated the bike was chained to a fence in the pocket park on the morning of June 30, and when he returned on Tuesday, it was missing. The larceny was reported for the record.

4:32 p.m. – A police officer reported finding a child support check made out to a White Plains resident on a Washington Avenue sidewalk. The officer contacted the child support office, which advised the officer to mail the check to the woman. 

10:20 a.m. – A Pleasantville man reported losing his black iPhone in the area of on June 30.

Monday, July 4

9:33 p.m. – Police made a traffic stop which resulted in the arrest of a passenger in the vehicle. The 17-year-old Briarcliff Manor teen is charged with Unlawful Possession of Marijuana. Read more .

6:58 p.m. – A Pleasantville called police to report youths possibly burning fecal matter on newspaper near the  on Manville Road. The responding officer reported seeing three youths flee the area and observed the burnt material on the ground. The incident was reported for the record.

1:11 p.m. – The same man (as below) called back to tell police some of his co-workers in Pelham Manor have been accusing him of stealing tips and one grabbed and threatened him at work. Police advised the man to contact Pelham police to report the incident and to contact Pleasantville police if he continues to receive similar phone calls.

12:50 p.m. – A Pleasantville man came into police headquarters and reported he has been receiving phone calls on his cell from someone claiming to be "Big John." The man stated he doesn't know anyone by that name, but believes the caller might be in relation to his job in Pelham Manor.

Note: The Patch Police Blotter is a summary only – it does not represent all activity of the Pleasantville Police Department.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 05:07 pm
CORRECTION TO LAST POST: The last sentence should read: "Let's continue to share, butRead More face-to-face." Thx - Sonny
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 06:06 am
Thanks, Jon - you raise important considerations and in a calm, dispassionate way, which IRead More appreciate. As for alternative funding mechanisms, in hindsight I believe they should have been examined and addressed this earlier this year had the decision-making been opened up to the public in a completely bidirectional manner much earlier in this year's budget cycle. A real take-away from this situation, in my opinion, is that we in the community were not given the opportunity to sit down together with sharpened pencils in a public forum and allowed to vet and actually challenge the Administration's assumptions in order to arrive at budget alternatives with the Administration and Board. The comparison you make with Washington is indeed apt in that it reflects the way decisions have slid back to being made in a vacuum and handed down to the voters instead of in a democratic fashion based on budget-to-actuals instead of budget-to-budget figures combined with the practice of over-reserving for expense items while under-estimating revenues. Although the Board did indeed reach out to me and 2 others asking for suggestions, when we re-iterated our request for an open meeting format to include other financially savvy community members, these requests were consistently ignored. Which is why we are in the current position we are in having to decide on Tues on a tax levy cap-busting budget requiring 60% super-majority. Which the public will decide, of course, and we will live with the consequences: either it passes, or the Board and Administration will be forced to rein in the excesses. And much as I love open debate, I restate that online posting leaves does leave a lot to be desired. Let's continue to share, but not face-to-face. Respectfully - Sonny
Jon Satran May 18, 2013 at 12:16 am
Sonny, I like the idea of brainstorming together, thinking outside of the box, but there are someRead More major obstacles that I think you need to consider: 1) A Bond referendum requires a 45 days’ notice period. It cannot be presented for a vote before this year's budget process is concluded. 2) To release reserves based on the hope that a future bond vote would be successful is reckless. What happens if reserves are released and then the bond referendum fails? You would not risk your home finances with this type of risk, would you really risk your school’s financial health? 3) Our tax certiorari reserve was just recently reviewed in consultation with our attorneys and we are appropriately reserved for today’s commercial real estate market. 4) Most importantly, this proposal would create a larger and tougher tax increase next year. In other words, adding $1,000,000 of revenue this year through a loan would require replacing that revenue with an additional $1,000,000 again next year and the year after. Borrow and spend economics does not work as we have seen from the national level. Deficit spending, which has been suggested may or may not work in Washington, but it certainly does not in Briarcliff Manor. When the school’s reserves are exhausted, we will face impactful program cuts or much larger tax levy increases. Respectfully - Jon Satran
JanFisher May 17, 2013 at 10:55 pm
It is so wonderful that, recognizing the importance of STEM and following the recommendation of ourRead More educators, Sal Maglietta and Jon Satran agreed to bring on the district's first director of instructional technology.
McKey Rivers May 10, 2013 at 07:36 pm
Thank you Dr. Sternberg for your thoughtful letter. You hit on an important facet of this electionRead More few if any others have stated: electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder will provide the added benefit of diversity of thought as the Board continues to address difficult, ongoing educational and financial issues. There is a woeful absence of synergy produced by articulation of different views among the current Board members. The absence of a “check and balance” on the current Board is reflected in the inexplicable decision to cancel the May 13 BOE meeting (scheduled since last summer), which is the last meeting prior to the May 21 budget vote and board election. Is there no business for the Board to conduct at this critical juncture or could it be that the Board does not want Briarcliff residents to hear members of the community question the Board about the proposed budget right before the election? Electing either Mr. Linder and/or Mr. Wasserman will immediately benefit the public as the highest vote getter will be seated on May 22 and thus participate in formulating a second budget for public vote that, notwithstanding current BOE scare tactics, can be tax levy compliant and not involve additional program elimination or reduction. There is no doubt that electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder to the Briarcliff School Board will substantially benefit the entire Briarcliff community and provide a much needed check on Board decision making.
Herman Sexton May 10, 2013 at 03:48 pm
Electing Paul Wasserman alone would add a diversity of thought. The guy hears at least a dozenRead More voices in his head. Have you ever spoken to him? Did you pay attention when he was running for Congress for a few weeks? Ugh.