.
Feedback

Report Names Harrison Cop Who Fired Shots

Lohud.com has reported Harrison Police Lt. Vito Castellano accidentally fired two shots while police apprehended three burglary suspects.

A published news report has identified the Harrison cop who sources say shot one of three suspected burglars near Interstate 287 as police surrounded their vehicle on Oct. 17. 

Citing unnamed sources, LoHud.com is reporting Harrison Police Lieutenant Vito Castellano fired his AR-15 rifle at least two times as police prepared to make the arrests, striking one of the suspects as well as Harrison Police Detective Stephen Barone. 

Barone was struck in his bulletproof vest, possibly by a ricocheted bullet, according to the report. The wounded suspect, Daniel Dibiase, 55, has been recovering at Westchester Medical Center under police guard since the incident.

According to the report, Castellano's gun may have gone of accidentally because there were no threatening movements inside the vehicle.

Police also arrested Carmine Stanzione (a.k.a. Paul Dibiase), 57, and Jason Foskey, 34. The three were traveling together in a Chevrolet Trailblazer when they were stopped at about 6:40 p.m. the night of the arrests, police say. All three suspects face felony charges and are suspects in a number of burglaries throughout the region.

Although police provided Patch with details of their investigation into the three suspects this week, Police Chief Anthony Marraccini has declined to provide any details of the events leading up to the shooting, citing an on-going investigation.

When asked about the report Thursday, Marraccini called the possible leak "outrageous" and said it threatens a critical investigation.

"I don't believe that the release of information is fair to the department, it's not fair to the county police department who are doing an outstanding job during the course of our investigation," Marraccini said. "The sensationalism and pre-mature release of information is self-serving for the news agencies that are putting it out there."

Harrison police asked county police to conduct their own investigation into the shooting shortly after the arrests. County Police spokesperson Kieran O'Leary said Thursday his department is still working on that investigation.

"We haven't reached any conclusions yet," he said.

Marraccini declined to discuss the shooting Thursday, but said he is hopeful the investigation will be complete at some point next week.

Harrison Police had tracked Stanzione, Dibiase and Foskey for weeks before making the arrests on Oct. 17. Marraccini said this week police used a GPS tracking device, sound bugs and other devices as they followed the men "from Poughquag to Harrison to Far Hills, New Jersey."

The three are suspects in two local home invasions—one on Sept. 3 and another on Oct. 11.

The case against the three men was moved into federal court last week and the three men have since been linked to incidents in Bedford and New Canaan, CT.

"It's important to keep in mind that we have taken three extremely dangerous, violent felons off of our streets," Marraccini said Thursday.

"Unfortunately, we don't stack library books for a living," he added, "police work is just that, and unfortunately comes along with many dangers."

Marraccini said this week police had reason to believe the men were armed during last week's arrest. Police later found a loaded handgun hidden in the suspects' vehicle. The .40 caliber handgun was hidden inside a bag containing gloves, ski masks and other burglar's tools, Marraccini said, adding that the gun was stolen from a member of the Putnam County Sheriff's department. 

Police later found another loaded .40 caliber handgun and $55,000 cash in Foskey's home, according to a statement from police.

Marraccini also said he is confident the three men had plans to burglarize a home in Harrison or Rye the night of the arrests.

Police believe Dibiase, Stanzione and Foskey had been working together for more than a year. Dibiase and Stanzione are brothers through adoption and both have extensive criminal records, Marraccini said. The two lived together in Poughquag, NY.

Foskey is engaged to Dibiase's sister and lived with her in Stormville, NY.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 05:07 pm
CORRECTION TO LAST POST: The last sentence should read: "Let's continue to share, butRead More face-to-face." Thx - Sonny
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 06:06 am
Thanks, Jon - you raise important considerations and in a calm, dispassionate way, which IRead More appreciate. As for alternative funding mechanisms, in hindsight I believe they should have been examined and addressed this earlier this year had the decision-making been opened up to the public in a completely bidirectional manner much earlier in this year's budget cycle. A real take-away from this situation, in my opinion, is that we in the community were not given the opportunity to sit down together with sharpened pencils in a public forum and allowed to vet and actually challenge the Administration's assumptions in order to arrive at budget alternatives with the Administration and Board. The comparison you make with Washington is indeed apt in that it reflects the way decisions have slid back to being made in a vacuum and handed down to the voters instead of in a democratic fashion based on budget-to-actuals instead of budget-to-budget figures combined with the practice of over-reserving for expense items while under-estimating revenues. Although the Board did indeed reach out to me and 2 others asking for suggestions, when we re-iterated our request for an open meeting format to include other financially savvy community members, these requests were consistently ignored. Which is why we are in the current position we are in having to decide on Tues on a tax levy cap-busting budget requiring 60% super-majority. Which the public will decide, of course, and we will live with the consequences: either it passes, or the Board and Administration will be forced to rein in the excesses. And much as I love open debate, I restate that online posting leaves does leave a lot to be desired. Let's continue to share, but not face-to-face. Respectfully - Sonny
Jon Satran May 18, 2013 at 12:16 am
Sonny, I like the idea of brainstorming together, thinking outside of the box, but there are someRead More major obstacles that I think you need to consider: 1) A Bond referendum requires a 45 days’ notice period. It cannot be presented for a vote before this year's budget process is concluded. 2) To release reserves based on the hope that a future bond vote would be successful is reckless. What happens if reserves are released and then the bond referendum fails? You would not risk your home finances with this type of risk, would you really risk your school’s financial health? 3) Our tax certiorari reserve was just recently reviewed in consultation with our attorneys and we are appropriately reserved for today’s commercial real estate market. 4) Most importantly, this proposal would create a larger and tougher tax increase next year. In other words, adding $1,000,000 of revenue this year through a loan would require replacing that revenue with an additional $1,000,000 again next year and the year after. Borrow and spend economics does not work as we have seen from the national level. Deficit spending, which has been suggested may or may not work in Washington, but it certainly does not in Briarcliff Manor. When the school’s reserves are exhausted, we will face impactful program cuts or much larger tax levy increases. Respectfully - Jon Satran
JanFisher May 17, 2013 at 10:55 pm
It is so wonderful that, recognizing the importance of STEM and following the recommendation of ourRead More educators, Sal Maglietta and Jon Satran agreed to bring on the district's first director of instructional technology.
McKey Rivers May 10, 2013 at 07:36 pm
Thank you Dr. Sternberg for your thoughtful letter. You hit on an important facet of this electionRead More few if any others have stated: electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder will provide the added benefit of diversity of thought as the Board continues to address difficult, ongoing educational and financial issues. There is a woeful absence of synergy produced by articulation of different views among the current Board members. The absence of a “check and balance” on the current Board is reflected in the inexplicable decision to cancel the May 13 BOE meeting (scheduled since last summer), which is the last meeting prior to the May 21 budget vote and board election. Is there no business for the Board to conduct at this critical juncture or could it be that the Board does not want Briarcliff residents to hear members of the community question the Board about the proposed budget right before the election? Electing either Mr. Linder and/or Mr. Wasserman will immediately benefit the public as the highest vote getter will be seated on May 22 and thus participate in formulating a second budget for public vote that, notwithstanding current BOE scare tactics, can be tax levy compliant and not involve additional program elimination or reduction. There is no doubt that electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder to the Briarcliff School Board will substantially benefit the entire Briarcliff community and provide a much needed check on Board decision making.
Herman Sexton May 10, 2013 at 03:48 pm
Electing Paul Wasserman alone would add a diversity of thought. The guy hears at least a dozenRead More voices in his head. Have you ever spoken to him? Did you pay attention when he was running for Congress for a few weeks? Ugh.