.
Feedback

Briarcliff People's Caucus Names its Board Candidates

Mayor William Vescio, Trustee Lori Sullivan and Trustee candidate Mark Wilson fielded residents' questions.

Briarcliff Manor Mayor William Vescio is looking to continue addressing some of the village's ongoing projects in his next term.

"You all know what we have done over the last eight years and hopefully we will continue to do what we have done to preserve the village, increase the quality of services and keep taxes at bay," he said at Wednesday's People's Caucus of Briarcliff Manor meeting. "There are certain things that we as a board, myself in particular, want to finish up over the next two years."

Vescio was officially named the non-partisan village party's mayoral candidate for the March 2013 election on Wednesday. He will appear alongside fellow incumbent board member Lori A. Sullivan and newcomer Mark Wilson on the People's Caucus line.

Current Deputy Mayor David Venditti will not be running for re-election this year.

Among the undertakings Vescio said he wants to put the finishing touches on in the upcoming two-year term are the community room at the Briarcliff Manor Public Library, village field upgrades and pursuing the transition of the village to a co-terminus town-village—independent of the towns of Mount Pleasant and Ossining.

Like us on Facebook | Follow us on Twitter | Sign up for our newsletter

Sullivan, a trustee for the past four years, noted that despite the tough economic times, the village has "been able to increase our bond rating from A1 to AA2."

"And," she added, "we are in the process of being evaluated and hoping we will wind up having a AA1 bond rating."

Said Sullivan, "The real joy of doing this and the fun of it, even though it takes many hours, is seeing the growth and development of Briarcliff and the pride the residents have in it and it makes it all worth it to give the time."

First-time candidate Mark Wilson, a village resident for more than 20 years, introduced himself to the Caucus and village as a community participant and someone who has "always been struck by the exceptional volunteerism demonstrated by village residents" and wants to give back himself now.

"As a chief financial officer and CPA with over 30 years of business experience, I believe that I bring strong analytical and governance skills to the trustee position, as well as a track record of volunteerism within and outside of the village," Wilson said, noting he has coached multiple youth sports and volunteered with Cub Scouts.

If elected, Wilson said, "As a village trustee, I believe that it is important to have both an educated and an open mind when addressing issues and discharging the duties of a trustee. I believe that it is important to continue and build upon the village’s good relationships with adjacent and overlapping government entities. Also as noted by the mayor, in these tough economic times, it is vitally important to maintain the village’s prudent financial practices, with respect to both operations and capital projects."

Residents were invited to ask the candidates' questions on Wednesday—topics ranged from the possible annexation of election districts 17 and 20 (a possibility largely dependent on the districts' residents' actions) from the unincorporated portion of the Town of Ossining to the fate of the Briarcliff campus of Pace University, a property that will not likely be vacated for some time, with the school still waiting to make additions in Pleasantville, Sullivan said.

Alan Grant of Beechwood Way asked the candidates what they plan to do about the erosion at Scarborough Park. Vescio responded that the village has studied the park and applied for grant money to help restore it.

"As with any project, there is a planning stage and then there is an action stage," Vescio said. "The intent of the board is to move forward with this, but over the last two years, we have been held up with the water project and some other things that were finishing up."

The first step in the project will be "the stabilization of the shoreline," Vescio said. 

Another resident asked about the housing project currently being erected at 445 North State Rd.

"It's not costing the village anything," Vescio said. "We get 14 units credit. We are so far ahead of everyone else as far as this game goes, it cost us nothing. It was like a no-brainer."

Moving forward, the mayor said he does not believe the economy is improving and the village will need to continue to utilize limited revenues, but continue providing strong services to residents.

"I think the number one priority for us is to continue to be creative in financial and in keeping the taxes down, and at the same time maintaining the quality of services," he said.


Check back with Patch soon for more on the two candidates seeking the People's Caucus line for the village justice position.

The 2013 village election will take place on Tuesday, March 19 from 6 a.m. to 9 p.m.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 05:07 pm
CORRECTION TO LAST POST: The last sentence should read: "Let's continue to share, butRead More face-to-face." Thx - Sonny
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 06:06 am
Thanks, Jon - you raise important considerations and in a calm, dispassionate way, which IRead More appreciate. As for alternative funding mechanisms, in hindsight I believe they should have been examined and addressed this earlier this year had the decision-making been opened up to the public in a completely bidirectional manner much earlier in this year's budget cycle. A real take-away from this situation, in my opinion, is that we in the community were not given the opportunity to sit down together with sharpened pencils in a public forum and allowed to vet and actually challenge the Administration's assumptions in order to arrive at budget alternatives with the Administration and Board. The comparison you make with Washington is indeed apt in that it reflects the way decisions have slid back to being made in a vacuum and handed down to the voters instead of in a democratic fashion based on budget-to-actuals instead of budget-to-budget figures combined with the practice of over-reserving for expense items while under-estimating revenues. Although the Board did indeed reach out to me and 2 others asking for suggestions, when we re-iterated our request for an open meeting format to include other financially savvy community members, these requests were consistently ignored. Which is why we are in the current position we are in having to decide on Tues on a tax levy cap-busting budget requiring 60% super-majority. Which the public will decide, of course, and we will live with the consequences: either it passes, or the Board and Administration will be forced to rein in the excesses. And much as I love open debate, I restate that online posting leaves does leave a lot to be desired. Let's continue to share, but not face-to-face. Respectfully - Sonny
Jon Satran May 18, 2013 at 12:16 am
Sonny, I like the idea of brainstorming together, thinking outside of the box, but there are someRead More major obstacles that I think you need to consider: 1) A Bond referendum requires a 45 days’ notice period. It cannot be presented for a vote before this year's budget process is concluded. 2) To release reserves based on the hope that a future bond vote would be successful is reckless. What happens if reserves are released and then the bond referendum fails? You would not risk your home finances with this type of risk, would you really risk your school’s financial health? 3) Our tax certiorari reserve was just recently reviewed in consultation with our attorneys and we are appropriately reserved for today’s commercial real estate market. 4) Most importantly, this proposal would create a larger and tougher tax increase next year. In other words, adding $1,000,000 of revenue this year through a loan would require replacing that revenue with an additional $1,000,000 again next year and the year after. Borrow and spend economics does not work as we have seen from the national level. Deficit spending, which has been suggested may or may not work in Washington, but it certainly does not in Briarcliff Manor. When the school’s reserves are exhausted, we will face impactful program cuts or much larger tax levy increases. Respectfully - Jon Satran
JanFisher May 17, 2013 at 10:55 pm
It is so wonderful that, recognizing the importance of STEM and following the recommendation of ourRead More educators, Sal Maglietta and Jon Satran agreed to bring on the district's first director of instructional technology.
McKey Rivers May 10, 2013 at 07:36 pm
Thank you Dr. Sternberg for your thoughtful letter. You hit on an important facet of this electionRead More few if any others have stated: electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder will provide the added benefit of diversity of thought as the Board continues to address difficult, ongoing educational and financial issues. There is a woeful absence of synergy produced by articulation of different views among the current Board members. The absence of a “check and balance” on the current Board is reflected in the inexplicable decision to cancel the May 13 BOE meeting (scheduled since last summer), which is the last meeting prior to the May 21 budget vote and board election. Is there no business for the Board to conduct at this critical juncture or could it be that the Board does not want Briarcliff residents to hear members of the community question the Board about the proposed budget right before the election? Electing either Mr. Linder and/or Mr. Wasserman will immediately benefit the public as the highest vote getter will be seated on May 22 and thus participate in formulating a second budget for public vote that, notwithstanding current BOE scare tactics, can be tax levy compliant and not involve additional program elimination or reduction. There is no doubt that electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder to the Briarcliff School Board will substantially benefit the entire Briarcliff community and provide a much needed check on Board decision making.
Herman Sexton May 10, 2013 at 03:48 pm
Electing Paul Wasserman alone would add a diversity of thought. The guy hears at least a dozenRead More voices in his head. Have you ever spoken to him? Did you pay attention when he was running for Congress for a few weeks? Ugh.
W Obermeyer May 10, 2013 at 03:41 pm
Not too diffiicult to play with figures. Look at the budget decrease and the increase in state aid,Read More then claim the budget is actually less.
Mike Valenti May 1, 2013 at 04:50 pm
Second, Mr. Sternberg comments “The previous Board reversed that trend but now a new schoolRead More Board reversed that and we are back to square one.” This is without question factually and ideologically incorrect. The previous Board, populated by Janet Marinaccio, Guy Rotundo, Eric Bashford and Rosella Ranno, were sponsored by the folks in our District who are of the fiscal conservative/tea-party-like taxation ideology. Yes, they aggressively cut the school budget over the course of their term. However, this year’s school budget is actually lower than last years. So, to suggest that the current Board has reversed tack on this issue is factually incorrect.
Mike Valenti May 1, 2013 at 04:49 pm
I commend Mr. Sternberg for his thoughtful, well written letter. However, I must take issue withRead More several of his points. First, he offers an analysis of various interests in our District and their motives regarding our school budget. If I may, here is another more simplified viewpoint. The predominance of District residents moved here for the school district (whether for its value to their children or its value for their real estate). These folks have a very supportive ideology with respect to taxation in support of the District. On the other side of the ledger stands a group who has a fiscal conservative, tea-party-like taxation ideology. They seek to cut, cut, cut with disregard to the integrity and depth of the educational program and resources. (continued)...