.
Feedback

DJ Henry: Parents, Lawyer Claim Cover Up by Authorities

Mount Pleasant police, Westchester County District Attorney's office are accused of lying in a Thursday press conference.

The lawyer for the family of slain Pace University football player Danroy "DJ" Henry claims that top-ranking Mount Pleasant policemen and the Westchester County District Attorney's office covered up important information surrounding his 2010 death.

Talking to reporters on Thursday morning at the Doubletree Hilton in Tarrytown, attorney Michael Sussman accused Chief Louis Alagno and Lt. Brian Fanelli of knowingly giving contradictory information concerning why Mount Pleasant officer Ronald Beckley fired his gun towards Henry's car, which was parked in a fire lane near Finnegan's Grill in Thornwood.

Sussman, based on gathering depositions from police involved, said that Beckley fired at Pleasantville police officer Aaron Hess, who he claims lunged onto the hood of Henry's car. Beckley, Sussman claimed based on his deposition, believed that Hess was an aggressor but did not know that he was a fellow officer.

Sussman said that Hess fired three shots at Henry, who was from Easton, MA, and at his friend and passenger Brandon Cox. Cox survived and was present at the Thursday media gathering.

The timeline of events came shortly after 1 a.m. on Oct. 17, 2010. However, Sussman then stated that based on a meeting around 4:50 a.m., Beckley told Fanelli of his belief that Hess appeared to be the aggressor and fired the shot to stop his conduct. Fanelli, Sussman then claimed, wrote a memo stating that Beckley fired because he believed that Henry's vehicle was a threat and shot at it, which the lawyer then said Beckley denied. 

Sussman then claimed that Alagno knew about Beckley's account, and that the memo was incorrect, but did not disclose it when he went to the media soon after the incident.

“He could provide no meaningful explanation for his public deception," said Sussman, who raised his voice frequently during the press conference.

Sussman said that Alagno was briefed about Beckley's account by Fanelli around 7:30 a.m. on the day of his press conference, and that two representatives of the district attorney's office were present. He then said that Alagno did not disclose Beckley's account about Hess and instead told the press details listed in Fanelli's memo, that he fired at the vehicle because he felt he was at risk. The officials from the district attorney's office were present at the press conference, he said.

It was, he claimed, a knowingly "false statement by a person who's still a police chief in this county.”

Sussman then claimed that Fanelli falsified his memo and broke state law in doing so, and that Beckley, according to his deposition, did not know about the contents of it until about a week before his testimony began.

The Town of Mount Pleasant and two of its officers are being sued by Henry's parents, Danroy and Angela Henry. They are also suing the Village of Pleasantville and Hess, who took a disability retirement last month. Alagno was due to continue his deposition on Thursday, Sussman said, and several witnesses have already been deposed, including Hess, Beckley and former Pleasantville Police Chief Anthony Chiarlitti.

Reading a paper copy of Alagno's earlier testimony, Sussman said that Alagno was asked about why Beckley's account of firing at Hess was not included in his statement to the press.

“It was a decision I had made at the time," Sussman said Alagno stated. Alagno then said, Sussman claimed, that he did not recall why he omitted mentioning it.  

Sussman also stated that Alagno said investigators did not speak to Beckley.

Reading another page from the deposition, Sussman said that Alagno stated the information about Beckley and Hess was intended to be given to a grand jury investigating the case. The minutes of the Westchester County grand jury have not been released, Sussman said to reporters.

The grand jury chose not to indict anyone for criminal charges in connection with Henry's death. 

Alagno was reached for comment by Patch but declined to talk about the Sussman's claims, citing the fact that the town is in litigation. He gave a phone number for the attorney representing Mount Pleasant, who could not be reached for comment.

Danroy Henry, Sr. gave his backing, to Sussman's assertion, at least generally speaking, calling the matter "a fabrication.”

Angela Henry blasted District Attorney Janet DiFiore, claiming that she told her there would be a thorough investigation, and said that she already knew what the truth was but chose to hide it.

Reached for comment, Lucian Chalfen, a spokesman for the district attorney's office, denied any cover up and stated that the grand jury investigation included a comprehensive report. According to a press release sent out when the decision not to press charges was made in February 2011, a total of 85 witnesses were heard. People contacted ranged from civilians to experts in fields such as ballistics and reconstruction.

Sussman, who noted that Mount Pleasant police took the lead in the investigation, called for New York State's government to create a special prosecutor's office to investigate cases of fatal actions taken by police. He argued that district attorneys, who rely on cooperation from local police for their work, can't be fair investigators of local authorities.

Sussman also made some other claims based on the depositions taken. They included Stephan van Ostrand, the owner of Finnegan's, stating that Henry showed no signs of being intoxicated and that he "closely" interacted with him. A test, released about a month after Henry's death, showed that he had a blood alcohol content (BAC) level of .13 percent, above the legal limit. Danroy Henry, Sr., who is skeptical about the veracity of the result, pointed out the bar owner's account and felt that more inquiry into the difference between it and the BAC result should be done.

Sussman also suggested that, based on Beckley's testimony, Hess indicated he had been shot in his knee when he fired his round towards him. He also speculated that Hess did not sustain an injury in connection with being on Henry's car, but that Beckley shooting him was a cause.

Reached for comment, Hess' attorney Brian Sokoloff said that Hess was not shot, and that his injury was connected to being hit by Henry's car. He also felt that Beckley's account, in which he said Hess stated his leg was "shot," was being taken out of context, referencing another definition for the term in which general injury is conveyed.

Asked after the press conference whether he felt Pleasantville was also engaged in a cover up, Sussman said he does not know.

Sussman said that transcripts of the depositions will be posted on the website of his law firm. The depositions were supposed to be completed by March but he told the press that he is doubtful that will happen on time.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lisa Jenner May 20, 2013 at 08:18 am
The BPTA (Vice-president: Laura Maglietta) supports the BOE budget (President: Sal Maglietta).Read More Wow. That's a surprise!
Lisa Jenner May 20, 2013 at 08:24 am
I might also add that while the BOE has put forth a budget that is a REDUCTION in spending, there isRead More also a projected REDUCTION in the school enrollment. Consequently, the per pupil expenditure shows a projected INCREASE from $30,146.59 in 2012/13 to $30,639.98 in 2012/13.
Lisa Jenner May 19, 2013 at 05:57 pm
I also agree with Mr. Venditti with his assessment that more money does not necessarily mean betterRead More education. The districts to which we like to compare ourselves outperform us in many areas, and they do so at a better cost. Our BOE and administrative team need to look at other districts and learn from them.
Lisa Jenner May 19, 2013 at 05:51 pm
I agree with Mr. Venditti regarding the tax burden in Briarcliff, and, as usual, I disagree with Mr.Read More Valenti. My oldest son, a Briarcliff High School graduate, has secured a job in Westchester and is looking to purchase his first home. Briarcliff is not even in the running for him, because the taxes are so high. He is looking in nearby communities where the taxes are not so burdensome. While this story is anecdotal, it does support the statement that potential buyers steer clear of Briarcliff because of the taxes.
robin May 20, 2013 at 06:44 am
If I may also point out that the "3 minute rule" was instituted by the previous board.Read More This same board also moved public comment to the beginning of the meeting. And while this may have worked well if you were a mind reader and knew what was going to be discussed, it makes far more sense to have public comment after presentations and board discussions. The current board, under the leadership of Sal Maglietta, has allowed for public comment multiple times in the same meeting. They are most certainly listening to what the community has to say. Please join me and my family in re-electing Jon Satran and Sal Maglietta. Please also join us in voting YES on the school budget.
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 09:31 pm
This year’s school budget is a REDUCTION in spending by the district versus last year’sRead More budget. We are the ONLY district in Westchester to forward a reduction for our community to vote on. The reason we will slightly violate the tax-cap is due to the fiscal irresponsibility of a prior board using fund balance to cushion the budget and create the illusion of a cap-compliant budget. Please join me in re-electing Jon Satran and Sal Maglietta. Please also join me in voting YES on this year’s school budget.
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 09:30 pm
Mr. Venditti and his crew are the same folks who sponsored the likes of Janet Marinaccio, GuyRead More Rotundo, Eric Bashford and Rosella Ranno. The community has spoken loud and clear in the last several elections as candidates sponsored by this group have been soundly defeated. The track records (and more importantly the comportment) of the aforementioned board members spoke volumes as to the agenda of this group. They are out of touch and out of clout. The community has made it clear that candidates sponsored by this group must never again control our school board. The damage done by the prior BOE majority has begun a cycle of meaningful healing under the current BOE majority. Continued...
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 09:40 pm
The damage done by the prior BOE majority has begun a cycle of meaningful healing under the currentRead More BOE majority. Please join me in re-electing Jon Satran and Sal Maglietta. Please also join me in voting YES on this year’s school budget.
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 09:39 pm
Mr. Rubich and his crew are the same folks who sponsored the likes of Janet Marinaccio, Guy Rotundo,Read More Eric Bashford and Rosella Ranno. The community has spoken loud and clear in the last several elections as candidates sponsored by this group have been soundly defeated. The track records (and more importantly the comportment) of the aforementioned board members spoke volumes as to the agenda of this group. They are out of touch and out of clout. The community has made it clear that candidates sponsored by this group must never again control our school board. Continued...
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 09:38 pm
While I respect Mr. Rubich's right to voice his alternative point of view, it is hardly objective asRead More he clearly states that his purpose is to illicit votes for the imploding campaign of Paul Wasserman and Louis Linder. Mr. Rubich's encouragement that the community vote down the school budget further tarnishes his judgement and credibility. Continued...
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 02:53 pm
Mr. Linder, This is YOUR post folks are responding to and your ideas. I find it curious at bestRead More that you began a public forum comment blog but advocate throughout your responses that the discussion should be taken off-line and out of public view. this really doesn't position you well as an advocate for transparency.
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 05:07 pm
CORRECTION TO LAST POST: The last sentence should read: "Let's continue to share, butRead More face-to-face." Thx - Sonny
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 06:06 am
Thanks, Jon - you raise important considerations and in a calm, dispassionate way, which IRead More appreciate. As for alternative funding mechanisms, in hindsight I believe they should have been examined and addressed this earlier this year had the decision-making been opened up to the public in a completely bidirectional manner much earlier in this year's budget cycle. A real take-away from this situation, in my opinion, is that we in the community were not given the opportunity to sit down together with sharpened pencils in a public forum and allowed to vet and actually challenge the Administration's assumptions in order to arrive at budget alternatives with the Administration and Board. The comparison you make with Washington is indeed apt in that it reflects the way decisions have slid back to being made in a vacuum and handed down to the voters instead of in a democratic fashion based on budget-to-actuals instead of budget-to-budget figures combined with the practice of over-reserving for expense items while under-estimating revenues. Although the Board did indeed reach out to me and 2 others asking for suggestions, when we re-iterated our request for an open meeting format to include other financially savvy community members, these requests were consistently ignored. Which is why we are in the current position we are in having to decide on Tues on a tax levy cap-busting budget requiring 60% super-majority. Which the public will decide, of course, and we will live with the consequences: either it passes, or the Board and Administration will be forced to rein in the excesses. And much as I love open debate, I restate that online posting leaves does leave a lot to be desired. Let's continue to share, but not face-to-face. Respectfully - Sonny
JanFisher May 17, 2013 at 10:55 pm
It is so wonderful that, recognizing the importance of STEM and following the recommendation of ourRead More educators, Sal Maglietta and Jon Satran agreed to bring on the district's first director of instructional technology.
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 09:53 pm
BOTH JON AND SAL have demonstrated as BOE trustees their unwavering commitment to EDUCATIONALRead More EXCELLENCE, FISCAL PRUDENCE, TRANSPARENCY, RESPECT, COMMUNITY VOICE, COLLABORATION, CIVILITY and MUCH MORE. JON AND SAL’s record speaks for itself. Their comportment during this campaign reinforces that THEY embody the QUALITIES and SKILL-SET to continue to represent US and OUR school district. Under the CURRENT BOE’s leadership, our district has restored levels of TRANSPARENCY, RESPECT, COMMUNITY VOICE, COLLABORATION and MORALE that had deteriorated substantially under the previous BOE majority. They have done this while also maintaining extreme fiscal prudence (we are the ONLY district in the County to produce a year over year budget reduction for our community to vote on) and while making decisions ONLY after having ALL of the FACTS and listening to ALL constituencies. THE FACT OF THE MATTER is that JON AND SAL deserve BOTH of YOUR votes on Tuesday, as does the budget.
McKey Rivers May 10, 2013 at 07:36 pm
Thank you Dr. Sternberg for your thoughtful letter. You hit on an important facet of this electionRead More few if any others have stated: electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder will provide the added benefit of diversity of thought as the Board continues to address difficult, ongoing educational and financial issues. There is a woeful absence of synergy produced by articulation of different views among the current Board members. The absence of a “check and balance” on the current Board is reflected in the inexplicable decision to cancel the May 13 BOE meeting (scheduled since last summer), which is the last meeting prior to the May 21 budget vote and board election. Is there no business for the Board to conduct at this critical juncture or could it be that the Board does not want Briarcliff residents to hear members of the community question the Board about the proposed budget right before the election? Electing either Mr. Linder and/or Mr. Wasserman will immediately benefit the public as the highest vote getter will be seated on May 22 and thus participate in formulating a second budget for public vote that, notwithstanding current BOE scare tactics, can be tax levy compliant and not involve additional program elimination or reduction. There is no doubt that electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder to the Briarcliff School Board will substantially benefit the entire Briarcliff community and provide a much needed check on Board decision making.
Herman Sexton May 10, 2013 at 03:48 pm
Electing Paul Wasserman alone would add a diversity of thought. The guy hears at least a dozenRead More voices in his head. Have you ever spoken to him? Did you pay attention when he was running for Congress for a few weeks? Ugh.