.
Feedback

Friday: Gas Shortage; What's Open [Updated]

Share your tips for finding gas, recharging and resting up in the Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor area.

As hundreds of Westchester County residents competed with out-of-towners looking to fill up their gas tanks on Thursday, the local stations with power found themselves quickly sold out.

A drive through Pleasantville and Briarcliff Manor yesterday revealed a slew of taped off gas pumps and overcrowding at the ones that remained open for business, such as the Citgo on North State Road in Briarcliff Manor.

A Chappaqua gas station owner told Patch callers from as far as Long Island, Brooklyn and Queens were looking for a place to fill up.

Please share your gas tips in the comments below!

If you are prepping for your commute today, the MTA and Metro North will be offering more service than yesterday:

  • Close to regularly scheduled service on the Hudson Line between Croton-Harmon and Grand Central Terminal
  • Close to regularly scheduled service on the Harlem Line between Southeast and Grand Central Terminal
  • Close to regularly scheduled service on the New Haven Line between Stamford and Grand Central Terminal will continue.

In Westchester County, the Bronx River Parkway has reopened, but some roads still have traffic lights out. The county asks residents to be on the lookout for four-way stop signs at these intersections. Bee-Line and Paratransit bus routes have resumed with some detours.

Continue to check this link for the latest updates and share/view post-Sandy photos at this link.

Briarcliff Manor schools remain closed today and Pleasantville schools are operating on a two-hour delay schedule. Pocantico Hills Central School remains closed.

The Pleasantville and Briarcliff Manor downtowns continued to be packed with locals looking for a place to warm up and recharge on Thursday.

Some of the places open and offering outlets and more include:

  • Starbucks (both villages)
  • Mount Pleasant Town Hall (shelter available — call 769-1941) 
  • Mount Pleasant Public Library (extended hours through the weekend — WiFi available)
  • Briarcliff Manor Public Library (extended hours through the weekend — WiFi and library computers available)
  • Pleasantville Diner
  • Moonbean Cafe (WiFi now available)
  • Club Fit
  • Black Cow Coffee Company
  • A Maze in Pottery
  • UMAC Briarcliff (offering full-day program for kids)
  • THE GYM in Armonk (showers for community members from 5 to 7 a.m. and 1 to 9 p.m. — bring a valid ID, towel and toiletries) 
  • The Town of Ossining is offering a free 12 to 8 p.m. program for kids at the Community Center — arts and crafts, movies, kickball, games, etc. (Grades 1 to 6 — call 941-3189 for more information)
  • Wondrous Things (charging stations)
  • Value Drugs (charging stations; batteries/flashlights are in stock)
  • The Rosenthal Jewish Community Center in Pleasantville is offering power, WiFi and playtime to local families:
    • Saturday, 9 a.m. to 2 p.m.: Free play in the gym and movies
    • Sunday, 9 a.m. to 2 p.m.: Movies and arts and crafts (gym not available)
  • The Briarcliff Manor Fire Department is offering movie nights at its headquarters tonight (RSVP by emailing FDChief@briarcliffmanor.org with the number of people attending):
    • Friday and Saturday from 6 to 8 p.m. — elementary school kids
    • Friday and Saturday from 8 to 10 p.m. — middle school kids 
  • Three Dogs Gluten Free-Bakery (Power, coffee, food, WiFi)
  • Sir Speedy (free fax, WiFi and power)
  • Coldwell Banker Residential offices in both Pleasantville and Briarcliff Manor (power, coffee/tea)

Tell us what else is open to the public in the comments below!

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 06:06 am
Thanks, Jon - you raise important considerations and in a calm, dispassionate way, which IRead More appreciate. As for alternative funding mechanisms, in hindsight I believe they should have been examined and addressed this earlier this year had the decision-making been opened up to the public in a completely bidirectional manner much earlier in this year's budget cycle. A real take-away from this situation, in my opinion, is that we in the community were not given the opportunity to sit down together with sharpened pencils in a public forum and allowed to vet and actually challenge the Administration's assumptions in order to arrive at budget alternatives with the Administration and Board. The comparison you make with Washington is indeed apt in that it reflects the way decisions have slid back to being made in a vacuum and handed down to the voters instead of in a democratic fashion based on budget-to-actuals instead of budget-to-budget figures combined with the practice of over-reserving for expense items while under-estimating revenues. Although the Board did indeed reach out to me and 2 others asking for suggestions, when we re-iterated our request for an open meeting format to include other financially savvy community members, these requests were consistently ignored. Which is why we are in the current position we are in having to decide on Tues on a tax levy cap-busting budget requiring 60% super-majority. Which the public will decide, of course, and we will live with the consequences: either it passes, or the Board and Administration will be forced to rein in the excesses. And much as I love open debate, I restate that online posting leaves does leave a lot to be desired. Let's continue to share, but not face-to-face. Respectfully - Sonny
Jon Satran May 18, 2013 at 12:16 am
Sonny, I like the idea of brainstorming together, thinking outside of the box, but there are someRead More major obstacles that I think you need to consider: 1) A Bond referendum requires a 45 days’ notice period. It cannot be presented for a vote before this year's budget process is concluded. 2) To release reserves based on the hope that a future bond vote would be successful is reckless. What happens if reserves are released and then the bond referendum fails? You would not risk your home finances with this type of risk, would you really risk your school’s financial health? 3) Our tax certiorari reserve was just recently reviewed in consultation with our attorneys and we are appropriately reserved for today’s commercial real estate market. 4) Most importantly, this proposal would create a larger and tougher tax increase next year. In other words, adding $1,000,000 of revenue this year through a loan would require replacing that revenue with an additional $1,000,000 again next year and the year after. Borrow and spend economics does not work as we have seen from the national level. Deficit spending, which has been suggested may or may not work in Washington, but it certainly does not in Briarcliff Manor. When the school’s reserves are exhausted, we will face impactful program cuts or much larger tax levy increases. Respectfully - Jon Satran
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 17, 2013 at 02:23 pm
Thanks for the insight. I would encourage all interested parties to weigh in on these importantRead More issues.
JanFisher May 17, 2013 at 10:55 pm
It is so wonderful that, recognizing the importance of STEM and following the recommendation of ourRead More educators, Sal Maglietta and Jon Satran agreed to bring on the district's first director of instructional technology.
McKey Rivers May 10, 2013 at 07:36 pm
Thank you Dr. Sternberg for your thoughtful letter. You hit on an important facet of this electionRead More few if any others have stated: electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder will provide the added benefit of diversity of thought as the Board continues to address difficult, ongoing educational and financial issues. There is a woeful absence of synergy produced by articulation of different views among the current Board members. The absence of a “check and balance” on the current Board is reflected in the inexplicable decision to cancel the May 13 BOE meeting (scheduled since last summer), which is the last meeting prior to the May 21 budget vote and board election. Is there no business for the Board to conduct at this critical juncture or could it be that the Board does not want Briarcliff residents to hear members of the community question the Board about the proposed budget right before the election? Electing either Mr. Linder and/or Mr. Wasserman will immediately benefit the public as the highest vote getter will be seated on May 22 and thus participate in formulating a second budget for public vote that, notwithstanding current BOE scare tactics, can be tax levy compliant and not involve additional program elimination or reduction. There is no doubt that electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder to the Briarcliff School Board will substantially benefit the entire Briarcliff community and provide a much needed check on Board decision making.
Herman Sexton May 10, 2013 at 03:48 pm
Electing Paul Wasserman alone would add a diversity of thought. The guy hears at least a dozenRead More voices in his head. Have you ever spoken to him? Did you pay attention when he was running for Congress for a few weeks? Ugh.
W Obermeyer May 10, 2013 at 03:41 pm
Not too diffiicult to play with figures. Look at the budget decrease and the increase in state aid,Read More then claim the budget is actually less.
Mike Valenti May 1, 2013 at 04:50 pm
Second, Mr. Sternberg comments “The previous Board reversed that trend but now a new schoolRead More Board reversed that and we are back to square one.” This is without question factually and ideologically incorrect. The previous Board, populated by Janet Marinaccio, Guy Rotundo, Eric Bashford and Rosella Ranno, were sponsored by the folks in our District who are of the fiscal conservative/tea-party-like taxation ideology. Yes, they aggressively cut the school budget over the course of their term. However, this year’s school budget is actually lower than last years. So, to suggest that the current Board has reversed tack on this issue is factually incorrect.
Mike Valenti May 1, 2013 at 04:49 pm
I commend Mr. Sternberg for his thoughtful, well written letter. However, I must take issue withRead More several of his points. First, he offers an analysis of various interests in our District and their motives regarding our school budget. If I may, here is another more simplified viewpoint. The predominance of District residents moved here for the school district (whether for its value to their children or its value for their real estate). These folks have a very supportive ideology with respect to taxation in support of the District. On the other side of the ledger stands a group who has a fiscal conservative, tea-party-like taxation ideology. They seek to cut, cut, cut with disregard to the integrity and depth of the educational program and resources. (continued)...