.
Feedback

Galef Gains Support from Two Environmental Groups

The New York League of Conservation Voters and the Sierra Club Lower Hudson Group gave state Assemblywoman Sandy Galef their endorsement Monday.

Two environmental groups gave their support to the re-election bid of state Assemblywoman Sandy Galef (D-Ossining), Monday during a press conference at Peekskill’s Riverfront Green Park.

Representatives from the New York League of Conservation Voters and the Sierra Club Lower Hudson Group rallied around Galef as she reaffirmed her commitment to protecting the Hudson Valley’s natural resources.

"I care so deeply about preserving and protecting our land, our air and our water," Galef said. "Whenever I deal with legislation in Albany, I always consider the impact on these two key natural resources. Having the endorsement of these two highly respected environmental organizations is an honor. It is important to my campaign, because the issues they advance are significant to voters of the Hudson Valley."

Galef, who was elected to the Assembly in 1992, is squaring off against Briarcliff Manor's Kim Izzarelli in the November 6 general election.

“Something I’ve been hearing too often over this election cycle is that the environmental movement is not at the top of anybody agenda and that has never been true with Sandy Galef and it’s not true this cycles,” said Nannette Bourne, chairwoman of the Westchester chapter of the New York League of Conservation Voters. “When we have called, she has answered. When she has needed information, she has always considered a resource and we very much appreciate that.”

Bourne praised Galef for co-sponsoring one bill that requires residents to be notified when the Hudson River has a sewage spill and for supporting the Environmental Protection Fund.

Ed Berry, co-political director of the Sierra Club Atlantic Chapter's Lower Hudson Group, said Galef received a score of 105 percent from Environmental Advocates of New York State’s environmental scorecard in 2011. Berry said that 105 percent is the highest score possible.

“Some people say ‘well, how do you get 105 percent’,” Berry said. “Well it’s simple. When you co-sponsor really key bills... I recommend extra credit and that’s what she got. Her co-sponsoring was of the Solar Industry Development and Jobs Act. That was an extremely important bill and that’s not going to go away. That’s going to come back again.”

Berry said Galef was instrumental in the passage of the Water Resources Protection Act, the Power New York Act and the Complete Streets law.

“These are not just environmental initiatives that people say ‘Oh, that’s good, that’s nice,'” Berry said. “These were bills that were passed and are now law.”


Like us on Facebook | Follow us on Twitter | Sign up for our newsletter

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 05:07 pm
CORRECTION TO LAST POST: The last sentence should read: "Let's continue to share, butRead More face-to-face." Thx - Sonny
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 06:06 am
Thanks, Jon - you raise important considerations and in a calm, dispassionate way, which IRead More appreciate. As for alternative funding mechanisms, in hindsight I believe they should have been examined and addressed this earlier this year had the decision-making been opened up to the public in a completely bidirectional manner much earlier in this year's budget cycle. A real take-away from this situation, in my opinion, is that we in the community were not given the opportunity to sit down together with sharpened pencils in a public forum and allowed to vet and actually challenge the Administration's assumptions in order to arrive at budget alternatives with the Administration and Board. The comparison you make with Washington is indeed apt in that it reflects the way decisions have slid back to being made in a vacuum and handed down to the voters instead of in a democratic fashion based on budget-to-actuals instead of budget-to-budget figures combined with the practice of over-reserving for expense items while under-estimating revenues. Although the Board did indeed reach out to me and 2 others asking for suggestions, when we re-iterated our request for an open meeting format to include other financially savvy community members, these requests were consistently ignored. Which is why we are in the current position we are in having to decide on Tues on a tax levy cap-busting budget requiring 60% super-majority. Which the public will decide, of course, and we will live with the consequences: either it passes, or the Board and Administration will be forced to rein in the excesses. And much as I love open debate, I restate that online posting leaves does leave a lot to be desired. Let's continue to share, but not face-to-face. Respectfully - Sonny
Jon Satran May 18, 2013 at 12:16 am
Sonny, I like the idea of brainstorming together, thinking outside of the box, but there are someRead More major obstacles that I think you need to consider: 1) A Bond referendum requires a 45 days’ notice period. It cannot be presented for a vote before this year's budget process is concluded. 2) To release reserves based on the hope that a future bond vote would be successful is reckless. What happens if reserves are released and then the bond referendum fails? You would not risk your home finances with this type of risk, would you really risk your school’s financial health? 3) Our tax certiorari reserve was just recently reviewed in consultation with our attorneys and we are appropriately reserved for today’s commercial real estate market. 4) Most importantly, this proposal would create a larger and tougher tax increase next year. In other words, adding $1,000,000 of revenue this year through a loan would require replacing that revenue with an additional $1,000,000 again next year and the year after. Borrow and spend economics does not work as we have seen from the national level. Deficit spending, which has been suggested may or may not work in Washington, but it certainly does not in Briarcliff Manor. When the school’s reserves are exhausted, we will face impactful program cuts or much larger tax levy increases. Respectfully - Jon Satran
JanFisher May 17, 2013 at 10:55 pm
It is so wonderful that, recognizing the importance of STEM and following the recommendation of ourRead More educators, Sal Maglietta and Jon Satran agreed to bring on the district's first director of instructional technology.
McKey Rivers May 10, 2013 at 07:36 pm
Thank you Dr. Sternberg for your thoughtful letter. You hit on an important facet of this electionRead More few if any others have stated: electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder will provide the added benefit of diversity of thought as the Board continues to address difficult, ongoing educational and financial issues. There is a woeful absence of synergy produced by articulation of different views among the current Board members. The absence of a “check and balance” on the current Board is reflected in the inexplicable decision to cancel the May 13 BOE meeting (scheduled since last summer), which is the last meeting prior to the May 21 budget vote and board election. Is there no business for the Board to conduct at this critical juncture or could it be that the Board does not want Briarcliff residents to hear members of the community question the Board about the proposed budget right before the election? Electing either Mr. Linder and/or Mr. Wasserman will immediately benefit the public as the highest vote getter will be seated on May 22 and thus participate in formulating a second budget for public vote that, notwithstanding current BOE scare tactics, can be tax levy compliant and not involve additional program elimination or reduction. There is no doubt that electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder to the Briarcliff School Board will substantially benefit the entire Briarcliff community and provide a much needed check on Board decision making.
Herman Sexton May 10, 2013 at 03:48 pm
Electing Paul Wasserman alone would add a diversity of thought. The guy hears at least a dozenRead More voices in his head. Have you ever spoken to him? Did you pay attention when he was running for Congress for a few weeks? Ugh.