.
Feedback

Proposed Pleasantville Townhouse Development Moves Forward

Toll Brothers is looking for a zoning change to transform a vacant Washington Avenue office site into a townhouse development.

Representatives of residential developer Toll Brothers are moving forward with a proposal to build 70 townhomes at the currently vacant Saw Mill Office Campus on Washington Avenue in Pleasantville.

Appearing before the village's Board of Trustees Monday, David Steinmetz, an attorney with Zarin & Steinmetz, said Toll Brothers is looking to turn the 18-acre parcel at 485 Washington Ave. into three-bedroom luxury condominiums.

The proposal would require the currently CO (Campus Office) zoned property to be rezoned as residential-friendly, as well as a map text amendment to allow the PUD (Planned Unit Development ) zone to apply to a 15-plus acre parcel, versus the current 25-acre allowance.

"Our developed area would be approximately 10.5 of the 18 acres," Steinmetz said.

Insite Engineering Senior Vice President Scott W. Blakely outlined the components of the proposal, including changes made since the team last met with the board informally in September.

Like us on Facebook | Follow us on Twitter | Sign up for our newsletter

Toll Brothers is proposing a two-lane boulevard entrance with a center landscaped island at the site's sole entry point on Washington Avenue.

"We have provided two-car parking in each of the units," Blakely said.

In addition, there will be driveway parking and guest parking spots available for visitors "scattered throughout the development," he said.

Given the site's historical stormwater management issues, Blakely said Toll Brothers is proposing two drainage points and two stormwater basins on-site.

Preliminary water and sewer line plans have been reviewed by the village's Department of Public Works, he added.

"We are looking at about 22,000 gallons [of water] a day," Blakely said.

The site plan also includes a 24-foot road, with curbs, and cul-de-sac/turnaround areas at each of the north and south ends.

In response to an inquiry by Pleasantville Mayor Peter Scherer, Blakely asserted that the road would be maintained privately by the homeowner's association.

Toll Brothers Assistant Vice President James Fitzpatrick the eastern portion of the property will be "tuck-unders," meaning a garage will be built at ground level, along with two additional living levels above the garage.

On the western portion of the property, the "downhill units" would have garages located on the main living level, as well as a second story.

"We designed the site so all the units that face Washington Avenue, which are at-grade units, can accommodate first-floor master bedrooms, which we feel is very important," he said.

The "downhill units" will range from 2,000 to 2,700 square feet, according to Fitzpatrick, while the "uphill units" will measure approximately 2,800 apiece.

The uphill units would also require permission from the village to be built up to approximately 35-feet, five feet above the current requirement.

While Steinmetz noted the proposal is "not an age-restricted project," he added, "The target is empty nesters."

First floor bedrooms, he elaborated, are likely to appeal to this group.

Village Trustee Brian Skarstad asked if the developer has considered incorporating elements seen throughout the village, such as front porches.

"We are dealing with some site constraints and limitations just because of the nature of the site," Fitzpatrick responded. "So, big front porches...that would be a little difficult, but we understand the intent and we would certainly be open to looking at that, for sure."

Toll Brothers, a Pennsylvania-based company, is currently planning to purchase the property from current owner Benenson Capital.

Fitzpatrick said once the property is purchased and the site plan approved—a process requiring the input of both the Board of Trustees and Planning Commission—the site would be roughly developed and units built as they were sold, at approximately $500,000 to $600,000 each.

"We are 100 percent market-driven," he said.

Future residents would also be responsible for shelling out between $225 and $250 in fees to maintain the property, from snow plowing and landscaping to reserve funds, Fitzpatrick added.

Village Administrator Patricia Dwyer pointed out there will be no on-site recreation proposed as part of the plan. She also confirmed Toll Brothers plans to comply with the village requirement to set aside 10 percent of the units as "fair and affordable housing."

As part of the environmental impact assessment of the proposal, environmental planner Tim Miller said elements including traffic/trip generation, visual impacts and community character/compatibility with the neighborhood will be reviewed.

In addition, the developer will provide the village information on grading, techniques for erosion control, drainage and utilities.

"It is our hope and our expectation that through this EAF process we will be able to demonstrate to the village as lead agency the project will not have significant environmental impacts...and adopt a negative declaration," said Miller.

He said he plans to submit the Environmental Assessment Form package within two months.

Following a presentation by Toll Brothers representatives Monday, the Board of Trustees voted to establish itself as lead agency for the zoning petition. They also voted to refer the petition to the Planning Commission, where Steinmetz said they plan to get on the agenda at the "earliest possible date."

Other agencies involved in the process, including the village Planning Commission, Westchester County Department of Health and Planning Department; New York State Department of Environmental Preservation and village Architectural Review Board, will have 30 days to object to the village board serving as lead agency.

Toll Brothers will then have to go through the SEQRA process before a zoning text and map amendment can be adopted.

Said Scherer, "I am unimpressed with what goes on at the property now. I consider residential use to be an appropriate use there and we are delighted to receive this application."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
W Obermeyer May 21, 2013 at 01:13 pm
It would be funny were it not so sad. I recall seeing and hearing quite a lot of mud being slungRead More recently, in an unseemly manner, but by whom I wonder?
McKey Rivers May 21, 2013 at 12:51 pm
Mike, please try to keep it together later and don't be acting out again. The last thing theRead More community needs is another schools related criminal harassment case.
Jay Borrel May 21, 2013 at 12:42 pm
WRONG!
McKey Rivers May 21, 2013 at 12:56 pm
OMG!!! Is someone referring to Stacy Agona's experience on the School Board as a basis in decidingRead More how to vote today? Oh wait, that's her husband. One of my favorite Stacy moments on the school board was when, after having been a trustee for a year, a reference was made during a public meeting to the "reserve fund" and she blurted out, "What's that?"
Jay Borrel May 21, 2013 at 12:42 pm
There is nothing respectful about Mr. Valenti. While telling us that everyone else uses ugly andRead More negative campaigning, he forces his message down our throats with his constant badgering and pushing. And, while I do disagree with Mr. Agona at least he is a voice less heard, however a home buyer will definitely think twice when seeing that our schools are not ranked at the top, but our spending is. A home buyer would definitely think twice when seeing that our board went against the levy and asked for more. A home buyer will think twice when seeing that our board underhandedly appointed a superintendent with out any notice to the community of a vacancy. These are trustees, but how can we trust them. With regards to understanding the budget or not, a home buyer only sees the surface and there will be NO TRUST in this community if we do the wrong thing.
Rod Agona May 21, 2013 at 12:20 pm
Empty Nesters and everyone else: I respectfully disagree with Mr. Borrel on his post. There areRead More many reasons behind why the budget proposal by the BOE and the administrators exceeds the tax cap guideline. I ask that you check my wife’s posting in the Patch for more insight but I will not repeat here. From personal experience, my perspective is that young parents looking to buy a home will research many things including the community support for the schools. It is fairly common to look into school board budget voting as an impartial indicator of the community's support. Imagine you are deciding between towns X and Y and then you hear that town X voted down the budget. You won’t research any further if this is important to you. You will move on to another place where there is more support. Please consider this into your decision when voting today. A vote for the budget approval will do a great service to the protection of our real estate values, not to mention preserve educational excellence in the eyes of the experts we are currently paying to make those recommendations. I believe most Briarcliff residents will agree with me as evidenced by the fact that there has not been a budget rejection by the public in decades. I would also like to personally congratulate the current Briarcliff BOE trustees for being the only school district in Westchester County to propose a lower budget than they did the prior year. Vote YES to the proposed Briarcliff budget. Vote JON SATRAN and SAL MAGLIETTA for BOE trustees.
Mike Valenti May 21, 2013 at 03:36 pm
It is Election Day in Briarcliff. There are TWO school board seats up for grabs and a budget to beRead More voted on. Please join me in voting for JON SATRAN and SAL MAGLIETTA to continue their terms as school board trustees. Please also join me in voting YES on the proposed school budget. Your vote for JON and SAL is a vote FOR continued TRANSPARENCY, RESPECT, COMMUNITY VOICE, COLLABORATION, PARTNERSHIP, CIVILITY, FISCAL PRUDENCE and MUCH MORE. Moreover, your vote for JON and SAL is a vote AGAINST the type of UGLY, NEGATIVE, MUDSLINGING campaigning you are witnessing (especially in these final, desperate hours) from the Linder/Wasserman camp. If we are ever to see this type of campaigning cease we must SPEAK LOUD AND CLEAR and SEND A MESSAGE that it does NOT appeal to us here in Briarcliff and we will NOT support the candidates forwarded or supported by those who conduct themselves in this unseemly manner. Please VOTE YES for JON and SAL. Please VOTE NO for SLEAZY SMALL-TOWN POLITICS. Respectfully, Mike Valenti
Jay Borrel May 21, 2013 at 01:04 pm
Wouldn't it be great if Mike Valenti moved out of Briarcliff?
Jay Borrel May 21, 2013 at 09:31 am
Hey Mike, the only thing worse than a tax hike and a secret appointment of a superintendent with outRead More looking at other candidates is your wasting our time with endless BS
Jay Borrel May 21, 2013 at 01:05 pm
Wouldn't it be great if Mike Valenti moved out of Briarcliff?
Gargamel May 21, 2013 at 07:26 am
Jay: more like Poooofff! Time to back to the North State Spa
Jay Borrel May 20, 2013 at 09:57 pm
Mr. Valenti your small mind is imploding
Jay Borrel May 21, 2013 at 08:25 pm
Wow Eric, how can I be hiding? I live here, you can look me up. I doesn't take much research orRead More rocket science. See you on the other side.
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) May 21, 2013 at 03:00 pm
Hi all -- lively discussion is fantastic and encouraged, but any personal and/or ad hominem attacksRead More will be deleted. Thanks for your cooperation.
Eric Nadler May 21, 2013 at 02:39 pm
As I write this I know that it is a mistake but I can't let it go. Mr. Rivers and Mr. Borrel pleaseRead More unmask yourselves. At least Ms. Agona and Mr Valenti (and myself) have the decency to make our views know publicly. By all means you have the right to voice your opinions but to do so under the guise of anonymity is what I would call cowardly. How can the voting public take your comments seriously if you don't have the gumption to stand behind them in public for the community to see. With that said - Mr Rivers, Mr Borrell take off your masks! Let's have a dialog face to face.
Jay Borrel May 21, 2013 at 01:06 pm
Wouldn't it be great if Mike Valenti moved out of Briarcliff?
W Obermeyer May 20, 2013 at 03:07 pm
I wonder why the voice of reason is suddenly so vocal? Reminds me of some earlier exchanges, if youRead More have read one you have read them all.
The Real Herman Sexton May 20, 2013 at 02:57 pm
oh wow, let's relive the attempted election of Mike Valenti several years ago. We went throughRead More this, proved I was a resident, etc. Anyway, does anyone know anyone in Briarcliff more annoying than Mike Valenti