.
Feedback

Westchester Reaches Contract Deal with Jail Supervisors

Union is third one to agree to make contributions toward health care insurance.

Westchester County and the Corrections Superior Officers Association have reached a tentative seven-year agreement which for the first time includes employee contributions to health care insurance coverage.

This is the third county government union to agree to such provisions.

A tentative pact, running retroactively from 2009 to 2015, was announced today by County Executive Robert P. Astorino and Corrections Superior Officers Association Acting President Bruce Donnelly. Union members approved the deal on Monday and it now goes to the Board of Legislators for approval.

“This contract, negotiated through the give and take of collective bargaining, is fair to both the union members and our taxpayers,” said Astorino. “Since taking office in 2010, I have repeatedly called on our county unions to pay some of the costs of their health care, just like everyone else.”

The Corrections Superior Officers Association follows the rank and file members of the Correction Officers Benevolent Association and Teamsters Local 456 to agree to new contracts with employee health care contributions.

The tentative seven-year pact calls for wage increases that average of 2.6 percent a year. The wage increases would be spread over periods that are more than 12 months to lower the cost to the Westchester, according to the county.

The future salary increases will be provided only to current employees. The county and union have agreed to a reduced salary schedule for new hires.

The Corrections Superior Officers Association represents about 120 sergeants, captains and assistant wardens in the county’s Department of Correction, which oversees the county jail and penitentiary on the Grasslands Reservation in Valhalla. Previously, the rank and file members of the Correction Officers Benevolent Association and members of Teamsters Local 456 had separately agreed to new contracts with health care contributions. 

Non-union county employees, including Astorino, already contribute to their health care costs, under terms of a law Astorino initiated in 2010.

“After tough negotiations by both sides, the new agreement provides SOA's membership and the county with contract stability through 2015 and at the same time demonstrates the membership’s commitment to work with the county government during these tough economic times by making a significant concession in agreeing to have its members contribute to the cost of healthcare,” said attorney Warren J. Roth of the Law Offices of Bartlett, McDonough and Monaghan LLP., speaking on behalf of the Corrections Superior Officers Association.

Astorino again called on the county’s other unions, including its largest—the Civil Service Employees Association (CSEA)—to follow the example set by the unions that have reached settlemens.

The CSEA has been working without a contract since Dec. 31, 2011. The county’s other four unions also have expired contracts as well.  They represent police officers and superior officers, investigators in the District Attorney’s Office and nurses.

Under the terms of the tentative agreement with the Corrections Superior Officers Association, members will begin paying a portion of their health care costs as follows:

  • Upon ratification by the Board of Legislators, all current SOA members will contribute 12.5 percent to health insurance costs. (For employees getting health care under the county’s self-insured plan administered by POMCO, this would be about $2,600 annually for a family plan or $986 for an individual.)
  • The employee contribution would rise to 13 percent on Jan. 1, 2013; to 14 percent on Jan. 1, 2014; and to 15 percent on Jan. 1, 2015, with caps to make sure that premiums on which contributions are based cannot rise more than 6.5 percent annually.
  • New employees hired will pay 20 percent towards the cost of their health care during their employment and in their retirement.
  • The tentative contract also includes increases in co-payments for doctor visits, emergency room visits and prescription drugs, as well as other cost-containment measures.

Compensation changes  as follows:

  • Effective Jan. 1, 2009, union members will get a 3 percent raise.
  • Effective Jan. 1, 2010, union members will get a 3 percent raise.
  • Effective Jan. 1, 2011, union members will get a 2.5 percent raise.
  • Effective April 1, 2012, union members will get a 2.5 percent raise.
  • Effective July 1, 2013, union members will get a 2.5 percent raise.
  • Effective July 1, 2014, union members will get a 2.5 percent raise.
  • Effective July 1, 2015, union members will get a 2.5 percent raise.
  • The tentative contract includes some increases in night shift differential and longevity pay. 

The Corrections Superior Officers Association has been working without a contract since Dec. 31, 2009, when its last one expired.


Like us on Facebook | Follow us on Twitter | Sign up for our newsletter

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 05:07 pm
CORRECTION TO LAST POST: The last sentence should read: "Let's continue to share, butRead More face-to-face." Thx - Sonny
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 06:06 am
Thanks, Jon - you raise important considerations and in a calm, dispassionate way, which IRead More appreciate. As for alternative funding mechanisms, in hindsight I believe they should have been examined and addressed this earlier this year had the decision-making been opened up to the public in a completely bidirectional manner much earlier in this year's budget cycle. A real take-away from this situation, in my opinion, is that we in the community were not given the opportunity to sit down together with sharpened pencils in a public forum and allowed to vet and actually challenge the Administration's assumptions in order to arrive at budget alternatives with the Administration and Board. The comparison you make with Washington is indeed apt in that it reflects the way decisions have slid back to being made in a vacuum and handed down to the voters instead of in a democratic fashion based on budget-to-actuals instead of budget-to-budget figures combined with the practice of over-reserving for expense items while under-estimating revenues. Although the Board did indeed reach out to me and 2 others asking for suggestions, when we re-iterated our request for an open meeting format to include other financially savvy community members, these requests were consistently ignored. Which is why we are in the current position we are in having to decide on Tues on a tax levy cap-busting budget requiring 60% super-majority. Which the public will decide, of course, and we will live with the consequences: either it passes, or the Board and Administration will be forced to rein in the excesses. And much as I love open debate, I restate that online posting leaves does leave a lot to be desired. Let's continue to share, but not face-to-face. Respectfully - Sonny
Jon Satran May 18, 2013 at 12:16 am
Sonny, I like the idea of brainstorming together, thinking outside of the box, but there are someRead More major obstacles that I think you need to consider: 1) A Bond referendum requires a 45 days’ notice period. It cannot be presented for a vote before this year's budget process is concluded. 2) To release reserves based on the hope that a future bond vote would be successful is reckless. What happens if reserves are released and then the bond referendum fails? You would not risk your home finances with this type of risk, would you really risk your school’s financial health? 3) Our tax certiorari reserve was just recently reviewed in consultation with our attorneys and we are appropriately reserved for today’s commercial real estate market. 4) Most importantly, this proposal would create a larger and tougher tax increase next year. In other words, adding $1,000,000 of revenue this year through a loan would require replacing that revenue with an additional $1,000,000 again next year and the year after. Borrow and spend economics does not work as we have seen from the national level. Deficit spending, which has been suggested may or may not work in Washington, but it certainly does not in Briarcliff Manor. When the school’s reserves are exhausted, we will face impactful program cuts or much larger tax levy increases. Respectfully - Jon Satran
JanFisher May 17, 2013 at 10:55 pm
It is so wonderful that, recognizing the importance of STEM and following the recommendation of ourRead More educators, Sal Maglietta and Jon Satran agreed to bring on the district's first director of instructional technology.
McKey Rivers May 10, 2013 at 07:36 pm
Thank you Dr. Sternberg for your thoughtful letter. You hit on an important facet of this electionRead More few if any others have stated: electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder will provide the added benefit of diversity of thought as the Board continues to address difficult, ongoing educational and financial issues. There is a woeful absence of synergy produced by articulation of different views among the current Board members. The absence of a “check and balance” on the current Board is reflected in the inexplicable decision to cancel the May 13 BOE meeting (scheduled since last summer), which is the last meeting prior to the May 21 budget vote and board election. Is there no business for the Board to conduct at this critical juncture or could it be that the Board does not want Briarcliff residents to hear members of the community question the Board about the proposed budget right before the election? Electing either Mr. Linder and/or Mr. Wasserman will immediately benefit the public as the highest vote getter will be seated on May 22 and thus participate in formulating a second budget for public vote that, notwithstanding current BOE scare tactics, can be tax levy compliant and not involve additional program elimination or reduction. There is no doubt that electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder to the Briarcliff School Board will substantially benefit the entire Briarcliff community and provide a much needed check on Board decision making.
Herman Sexton May 10, 2013 at 03:48 pm
Electing Paul Wasserman alone would add a diversity of thought. The guy hears at least a dozenRead More voices in his head. Have you ever spoken to him? Did you pay attention when he was running for Congress for a few weeks? Ugh.