.
Feedback

President Ronald Reagan on Gun Control

The 40th President weighs in.

Nationwide focus this week is on what President Obama had to say Wednesday about gun-control (and in New York on the passage of Governor Cuomo’s gun-control bill). But I'd like to look back for a moment on an earlier time, the time of President Ronald Reagan.  

It’s natural that as the debate on gun control moves forward, folks will pick up this quote or that—a sound bite here or there—and use it to buttress their position. I’ve seen this happen with the words of Ronald Reagan who, as President, was of course shot and almost killed in an assassination attempt.

“Those who seek to inflict harm are not fazed by gun-controllers,” is one quote that is getting a lot of attention today. But there was another quote, one we don’t hear as much, which he made as Governor of California:

“There’s no reason why on the street today a citizen should be carrying loaded weapons.”  

As folks parse and grapple with President Obama’s words this week, it might behoove us to consider President Reagan’s. Rather than lining up behind one of the above quotes or the other, is it possible to see them both as true?  

It’s hard to disagree with President Reagan’s statement that those who seek to inflict harm are not fazed by gun controllers. Fazed means disturbed or disconcerted. Those who seek to inflict harm are by definition disturbed, undeniably disconcerted. The question is: Should they be allowed to be legally walking the streets of our cities and towns with loaded weapons? The Second Amendment notwithstanding, Ronald Reagan’s answer to that question—“There’s no reason why on the street today a citizen should be carrying loaded weapons”—bears consideration:

It’s true that President Reagan’s position on gun-control shifted a few times. But in 1991 he decisively, passionately and eloquently threw his support behind the Brady Bill, requiring background checks and a seven day waiting period for handgun purchase. In an Op-Ed piece published in the New York Times looking back on the assassination attempt he survived, the former president said: 

“This nightmare might never have happened if legislation that is before Congress now—the Brady bill—had been law back in 1981... If the passage of the Brady bill were to result in a reduction of only 10 or 15 percent of those numbers (and it could be a good deal greater), it would be well worth making it the law of the land.” 

Around the same time, at a gathering at George Washington University marking the 10th anniversary of the attempt on his life, he was quoted as saying:   

“With the right to bear arms comes a great responsibility to use caution and common sense on handgun purchases. And it's just plain common sense that there be a waiting period to allow local law-enforcement officials to conduct background checks on those who wish to purchase handguns." 

Update on Initiatives

Back in Newtown, CT, scene of the latest massacre, folks have created Sandy Hook Promise, a non-partisan, non-profit organization dedicated to encouraging and supporting “common sense solutions that make their communities and our country safer from acts of violence like that which occurred at Sandy Hook Elementary School on December, 14, 2012.” 

Thomas Bittman, co-founder of the group, embraced his entire community when he said “The middle ground, and the answers, I actually think are going to come from gun owners themselves." Indeed, the latest poll from Pew Research Center  does indeed show support for reasonable controls from gun owners and non-owners alike. Also in Newtown, the mother of the youngest victim, Noah Pozner—whose body was riddled with eleven bullets—is expressing her own very personal views. 

Let’s continue to pay attention to the voices of Newtown, as sound bites vie for our attention. A soon-to-be released study from this week’s Johns Hopkins University symposium on gun violence will go a long way in helping us get past these sound bites toward newly helpful policy. More on that next week.

In the meantime please contact the White House to express your support for the new gun control measures. Here’s the link:  

http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/preventing-gun-violence#share

Please sign the petitions at Demand A Plan, Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, One Million Moms for Gun Control, We The People, and Americans for Responsible Solutions.

Please read my previous posts on gun control: Repairing the World: The Truth About Ending Gun Violence Now (December 20);  There is No God: Continuing Thoughts on Gun Control (December 27); Sabbath to Stop Gun Violence (January 3); and Christina’s Letter: More Thoughts on Gun Violence (January 10). 

Your comments are welcome.

Rabbi Mark Sameth is the spiritual leader of Joyful Judaism: Pleasantville Community Synagogue an inclusive, progressive synagogue – with members from twenty towns, villages and cities all across Westchester and “A Hebrew School Your Kids Can Love.” Read The New York Times article. Follow Rabbi Mark on Twitter . Weekly meditation at the synagogue every Saturday morning at 9 am is open to the public; everyone – without exception - is welcome and warmly invited. OUR MEMBERSHIP DRIVE IS ON. See “Top Ten Reasons to Join PCS” - as well as service times and events - at www.ShalomPCS.com.

James Adnaraf January 20, 2013 at 04:08 am
I agree with reasonable gun control, and it appears that Reagan did too.
Rabbi, when you bring up other topics, including abortion, the role of government, the issue of low marginal tax rates, please bring up Reagan's views on those as well. After all, we shouldn't just cherry pick his views when they seem to be consistent with ours. As a matter of fact, when Rabbi Mark discusses controversial issues in the future, I will be looking for him to refer to Reagan's views on them. That is fair, is it not?
James Redmam January 20, 2013 at 02:56 pm
Reagan also doubled the debt to GDP ratio. He's not exactly an ideal president, from a conservative point of view. Conservatism is about small government. Reagan was a big government President. Clinton presided over a decrease of the debt to GDP ratio. Clinton was more conservative, fiscally, than Reagan. Bush, again, and Obama, are increasing the debt to gdp.
James Adnaraf January 21, 2013 at 06:38 pm
The point is, Mr. Redman, that if you are going to take Reagan's opinion on gun control, cite his opinion on other issues as well.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Mickey Rivers June 19, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Actually, it would be terrific if State Officials intervened - to investigate Paul Wasserman, LouisRead More Linder and their operatives. Be careful what you ask for counselor, you may get it - in spades!
McKey Rivers June 19, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Sal, your arguments regarding the newly elected school board member are fantastical. Do you reallyRead More think the intelligent people of Briarcliff were tricked by Messers Wasserman and Linder when your fellow Board member and running mate, Jon Satran, garnered the most votes of all the candidates or is it more likely that most people simply did not want you back on the BOE and that is why you lost the election? Your ham handed handling of Superintendent Miller and abysmal Borad meeting attendance record are among several factors that contributed to your defeat. You still have a chance to turn a negative into a positive by admitting that it was wrong for the Board to attempt to frighten the community into approving the first budget proposal.
Mickey Rivers June 19, 2013 at 06:59 pm
The FAKE McKey Rivers has an absolute fixation with Sal Maglietta. Kind of creepy in a way. If IRead More were Sal I want to have McKey identified for the purpose of a restraining order. Sal Maglietta spent the past three years proving he has more integrity than your entire circle of nasty, ill-mannered friends. Now stop impersonating me. I am the REAL Mickey Rivers.
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 02:43 pm
What are folks hearing about tomorrow's vote? Will there be a good turnout at the polls?
Briarcliff PTA Executive Board June 18, 2013 at 10:02 am
We are hoping for a great turnout today. Briarcliff school district residents, please urge yourRead More neighbors and friends to get out and vote!
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 03:04 pm
Thanks Kathleen - important information about a significant part of the pet population!
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 03:05 pm
Thanks Kathleen! Important information about a nice way to connect senior pets with senior humans!
W Obermeyer June 11, 2013 at 02:29 pm
I am afraid we may be experiencing the calm before another storm. Most likely the aftermath of theRead More BOE budget hearing tonight will be more of a nightmare than a pleasant dream.
Lisa Jenner June 11, 2013 at 02:36 pm
I am afraid that when people become civilized, they become silent.
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 11:42 am
Thanks for putting yourself out there, Lisa! I hope others can contribute meaningfully to anyRead More discussion of community issues brought forth by thoughtful readers like you.
Brandon June 12, 2013 at 09:36 am
This is brilliant!
Mae Isaac June 12, 2013 at 09:49 am
This would be wonderful - I dread trying to drive to any of the schools that way. What about a leftRead More turn lane on to Pleasantville Road from 100 for school days? It might help those of us who live so close and yet have to drive in the opposite directions to reach the schools!
Tim June 14, 2013 at 07:53 am
Great idea in the mean time while we wait another 10 years maybe drivers could keep to the left whenRead More turning left, instead of blocking peeps trying to turn right. Also drivers need to stop blocking the entrance to Dunkin donuts etc.
Mickey Rivers June 11, 2013 at 09:52 am
Mr. O'Reilly is asking good questions in his post. I respect him for his approach. These areRead More difficult questions and as school districts continue to be squeezed at both ends (spiraling cost of benefit and pension costs at one end and tax-cap compliance choking the revenue side at other end) they will all continue be faced with these difficult questions. If school districts wait too long to develop reasonable decision trees to solve these issues, then our meddling friends in Albany will feel compelled to swoop in and screw it up royally. It is in our collective best interests to begin work now to develop and apply a thought process and resolution matrix to this issue before Albany does it for us. That requires two things. First, communities must put aside their differences and work together in a "non-partisan" manner toward local solutions that work for their district. Next, districts must collaborate and share ideas in an effort to share their ideas and help each other. At the moment, no one has the answers to Mr. O'Reilly's questions. I respect him for asking these questions and not offering solutions or opinions in his post. I also respect him for not calling out any particular district as we all all know these are issues that all districts faced this year universally. This issue will begin to compound annually if we all don't find a way to pull together and work towards solutions.
Lisa Jenner June 11, 2013 at 10:26 am
As a retired school teacher who is collecting a pension (to which I contributed for many years) andRead More is still using benefits (to which I contribute), let's remember that it is not only the teachers' pension and benefits that are squeezing the school budgets, but also, as the Briarcliff BOE pointed out, all those unfunded mandates. All of the BOEs have their hands tied regarding so many of their expenditures, that they will have to cut programs. Excellent questions, Mr. O'Reilly.
Mickey Rivers June 11, 2013 at 03:30 pm
Unfunded mandates are also a big issue for school districts. However, the teachers pensions andRead More benefits are a huge issue that must be addressed and recalibrated. It is time for teacher's pensions and benefits to be remodeled to look like those in the private sector. In the private sector, pensions are all but extinct - replaced largely by 401(k) plans (and in the case of teachers 403(b) plans where contributions are made by the employee. In terms of health benefits, in the private sector most companies pay a maximum of 60% of an employee's health care (and other benefits) premiums - not the 80% that is paid by school districts for teachers. This is financially unsustainable and needs to be addressed before it bankrupts school districts.
robin June 11, 2013 at 10:52 am
Mr. Borrel-Sorry if I came across as confrontational, that was not my intention. You should handleRead More your concerns as you think is best, however, I don't know what you will accomplish voicing your opinion in the Patch. It should also be noted, according to several high school teachers, that there are students who bring budget discussions into the classrooms.
Jay Borrel June 11, 2013 at 11:29 am
Thank you for your comments. I am sure that students do discuss, but the educator should addressRead More from a neutral stand point, just like an open discussion about religion or other politics.
Lisa Jenner June 11, 2013 at 12:25 pm
As a former high school teacher, I was constantly fending off attempts by students to divert me fromRead More teaching, and current events, local or otherwise, were a popular means to this end. Having said that, I, too, have heard of teachers "pontificating" about the budget, which, of course, is totally inappropriate. Let's hope the teachers in Briarcliff do know better and that the administration keeps a watchful eye. On a totally different topic, I have to laugh, Robin, at you looking in the directory for Mr. Borrel. The directory is my first resource for all people Briarcliff, forgetting they might not have children in the schools.
JanFisher June 8, 2013 at 10:05 pm
This is truly progress. Will both of you be taking down your negative comments now to really andRead More meaningfully get the ball rolling and to move beyond mere words? It will be good work when it is backed by real actions. I have not posted anything negative this entire time so really nothing has been accomplished yet except promises to behave. But I am truly glad that both of you are now committed to a standard of decency in public exchanges. Have a great weekend!
Lisa Jenner June 8, 2013 at 11:41 pm
I have read and re-read Mr. O'Reilly's thoughts on the BOE meeting and I will try to be fair aboutRead More this. I will admit that Mr. O'Reilly used some choice adjectives (strange, mysterious, nefarious) and asked a couple of somewhat inflammatory rhetorical questions (Will Mr. Wasserman serve his BOE time on the baseball diamond?), but I would suggest that if you disregard the rhetoric, he has presented a fairly factual presentation of what transpired at the meeting. Do you disagree?
JanFisher June 9, 2013 at 05:54 am
Lisa - my decision to write at all was out of excitement about the opportunity to help infuseRead More decency into these public exchanges. I have had my say and it has been positive. Quite honestly, I think the community at-large and the Briarcliff community are really tired of all of the public infighting on the Patch. I am committed to our schools and children and I choose to use my very limited free time and energy to volunteer for the schools when I can. Again, I do have many opinions and would love to speak with you in person- maybe we can do some good together. My cell - 439-0203.