.
Feedback

At Risk for Closure, St. Theresa School 'Shocked,' but 'Optimistic'

The Briarcliff Manor Catholic school is one of five in Westchester County that may close in 2013.

Briarcliff Manor's St. Theresa School community did not give itself much time to panic after learning Monday it is on the Archdiocese of New York's list of "at-risk" schools for 2012-13.

"After the initial shock wore off, it was just a matter of what we need to do to mobilize," said Donna Sutton, the Catholic school's principal.

St. Theresa School has been open at its quiet Dalmeny Road location since 1965, currently serves 147 students and has just over 20 employees.

This week, the Archdiocese's "local boards" and ad hoc Reconfiguration Committee announced 26 of the area's 159 elementary schools "are at-risk of closure in June 2013."

In Westchester County, Our Lady of Fatima in Scarsdale, Holy Name of Jesus in Valhalla, Our Lady of Assumption in Peekskill and St. Casimir in Yonkers were also labeled at-risk.

Last year, St. Ann's Parish School in Ossining was shut down.

"We already had an action plan—a strategic plan we had been using to make some improvements in terms of finances and enrollment and so on," Sutton said of the announcement.

Additionally, the school has raised $150,000 just this week from supportive families, parishioners of St. Theresa Church, benefactors and alumni. Some families have even paid next year's tuition in advance.

Nicole Hallinan, president of St. Theresa's Home School Association, said she has been flooded with calls from people who want to help out.

"I am on the phone all the time," she said. "People are calling asking, 'What can I do? How can I help?' It really is heartwarming."

Hallinan added the flood of support "is not surprising" given "the sense of family" at the school.

"The church has supported us all these years," Sutton pointed out. "We never asked for a penny from the Archdiocese. I think that says a lot right there in terms of how our parish community really has supported us."

According to a statement from the Archdiocese, the scrutiny of the region's schools is part of "Pathways to Excellence, the strategic plan for Catholic schools published in October 2010 and developed to assure a vibrant future for Catholic education. Under that plan, most parish elementary schools will align into geographic regions governed by the Boards."

A parent of a fourth grader and pre-kindergartner at St. Theresa's, Hallinan is also an alumna of the school herself.

"It was really a sad moment and realization that the experience I had at St. Theresa School—it could be that there are children who aren't going to be able to have that experience," she reflected. "St. Theresa is really community-based. When you walk through the doors as a new parent, you leave the same day feeling like you made friends."

Like us on Facebook | Follow us on Twitter | Sign up for our newsletter

The Archdiocese's plan centers around the "regionalization" of its schools, which is anticipated to be a more fiscally viable model.

"Today’s regionalization process builds on the actions taken two years ago to improve the fiscal health of the Archdiocese of New York and will help ensure that all our schools will remain financially stable and, more importantly, open to all students," Dr. Timothy J. McNiff, superintendent of schools, said in a statement.

The decisions about the affected schools were made by based on "enrollment, financial, academic and local demographics," according to the Archdiocese.

"The long-term goal of regionalization is to maintain sustainable, excellent local school options for families wishing a Catholic education," the statement said.

In the first week of January, the 26 schools on the list will present their financial plans to the Archdiocese for review. The boards and committees will work with the Archdiocese to offer final decisions for each schools that same month.

"We are just going to tweak [our existing plan] to address the financial issues and enrollment issues," said Sutton. "I am very confident that St. Theresa will remain open."

Sutton is in her second year at St. Theresa School and joined after her former school—Sacred Heart of Jesus School—was shut down.

"It has definitely prepared me in terms knowing what we are up against and the timeline," she asserted.

Sutton said some families have already pledged their interest in attending St. Theresa School next year and the school is pursuing "a more aggressive marketing campaign" to further regional awareness.

With the community's support, "rigorous academics" and "family environment," Sutton said confidently, "We can definitely achieve the goal."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 06:06 am
Thanks, Jon - you raise important considerations and in a calm, dispassionate way, which IRead More appreciate. As for alternative funding mechanisms, in hindsight I believe they should have been examined and addressed this earlier this year had the decision-making been opened up to the public in a completely bidirectional manner much earlier in this year's budget cycle. A real take-away from this situation, in my opinion, is that we in the community were not given the opportunity to sit down together with sharpened pencils in a public forum and allowed to vet and actually challenge the Administration's assumptions in order to arrive at budget alternatives with the Administration and Board. The comparison you make with Washington is indeed apt in that it reflects the way decisions have slid back to being made in a vacuum and handed down to the voters instead of in a democratic fashion based on budget-to-actuals instead of budget-to-budget figures combined with the practice of over-reserving for expense items while under-estimating revenues. Although the Board did indeed reach out to me and 2 others asking for suggestions, when we re-iterated our request for an open meeting format to include other financially savvy community members, these requests were consistently ignored. Which is why we are in the current position we are in having to decide on Tues on a tax levy cap-busting budget requiring 60% super-majority. Which the public will decide, of course, and we will live with the consequences: either it passes, or the Board and Administration will be forced to rein in the excesses. And much as I love open debate, I restate that online posting leaves does leave a lot to be desired. Let's continue to share, but not face-to-face. Respectfully - Sonny
Jon Satran May 18, 2013 at 12:16 am
Sonny, I like the idea of brainstorming together, thinking outside of the box, but there are someRead More major obstacles that I think you need to consider: 1) A Bond referendum requires a 45 days’ notice period. It cannot be presented for a vote before this year's budget process is concluded. 2) To release reserves based on the hope that a future bond vote would be successful is reckless. What happens if reserves are released and then the bond referendum fails? You would not risk your home finances with this type of risk, would you really risk your school’s financial health? 3) Our tax certiorari reserve was just recently reviewed in consultation with our attorneys and we are appropriately reserved for today’s commercial real estate market. 4) Most importantly, this proposal would create a larger and tougher tax increase next year. In other words, adding $1,000,000 of revenue this year through a loan would require replacing that revenue with an additional $1,000,000 again next year and the year after. Borrow and spend economics does not work as we have seen from the national level. Deficit spending, which has been suggested may or may not work in Washington, but it certainly does not in Briarcliff Manor. When the school’s reserves are exhausted, we will face impactful program cuts or much larger tax levy increases. Respectfully - Jon Satran
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 17, 2013 at 02:23 pm
Thanks for the insight. I would encourage all interested parties to weigh in on these importantRead More issues.
JanFisher May 17, 2013 at 10:55 pm
It is so wonderful that, recognizing the importance of STEM and following the recommendation of ourRead More educators, Sal Maglietta and Jon Satran agreed to bring on the district's first director of instructional technology.
McKey Rivers May 10, 2013 at 07:36 pm
Thank you Dr. Sternberg for your thoughtful letter. You hit on an important facet of this electionRead More few if any others have stated: electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder will provide the added benefit of diversity of thought as the Board continues to address difficult, ongoing educational and financial issues. There is a woeful absence of synergy produced by articulation of different views among the current Board members. The absence of a “check and balance” on the current Board is reflected in the inexplicable decision to cancel the May 13 BOE meeting (scheduled since last summer), which is the last meeting prior to the May 21 budget vote and board election. Is there no business for the Board to conduct at this critical juncture or could it be that the Board does not want Briarcliff residents to hear members of the community question the Board about the proposed budget right before the election? Electing either Mr. Linder and/or Mr. Wasserman will immediately benefit the public as the highest vote getter will be seated on May 22 and thus participate in formulating a second budget for public vote that, notwithstanding current BOE scare tactics, can be tax levy compliant and not involve additional program elimination or reduction. There is no doubt that electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder to the Briarcliff School Board will substantially benefit the entire Briarcliff community and provide a much needed check on Board decision making.
Herman Sexton May 10, 2013 at 03:48 pm
Electing Paul Wasserman alone would add a diversity of thought. The guy hears at least a dozenRead More voices in his head. Have you ever spoken to him? Did you pay attention when he was running for Congress for a few weeks? Ugh.
W Obermeyer May 10, 2013 at 03:41 pm
Not too diffiicult to play with figures. Look at the budget decrease and the increase in state aid,Read More then claim the budget is actually less.
Mike Valenti May 1, 2013 at 04:50 pm
Second, Mr. Sternberg comments “The previous Board reversed that trend but now a new schoolRead More Board reversed that and we are back to square one.” This is without question factually and ideologically incorrect. The previous Board, populated by Janet Marinaccio, Guy Rotundo, Eric Bashford and Rosella Ranno, were sponsored by the folks in our District who are of the fiscal conservative/tea-party-like taxation ideology. Yes, they aggressively cut the school budget over the course of their term. However, this year’s school budget is actually lower than last years. So, to suggest that the current Board has reversed tack on this issue is factually incorrect.
Mike Valenti May 1, 2013 at 04:49 pm
I commend Mr. Sternberg for his thoughtful, well written letter. However, I must take issue withRead More several of his points. First, he offers an analysis of various interests in our District and their motives regarding our school budget. If I may, here is another more simplified viewpoint. The predominance of District residents moved here for the school district (whether for its value to their children or its value for their real estate). These folks have a very supportive ideology with respect to taxation in support of the District. On the other side of the ledger stands a group who has a fiscal conservative, tea-party-like taxation ideology. They seek to cut, cut, cut with disregard to the integrity and depth of the educational program and resources. (continued)...