.
Feedback

BMEF Awards More Than $30K in Grants for 2011

The organization announced its 2011-12 academic year grants.

For teachers in the , the BMEF offers the unique opportunity to think outside of the box—and budget—to engage students in different ways.

"We are excited about the grants this year," said Liz Susman Karp, co-president of the Manor Education Foundation, explaining the process allows "teachers to say, 'What's on our wish list? What would I really love to have here and do? What would be a really great addition to our curriculum?'"

Karp said the grants often serve as a way for teachers to invest in programs, supplies or technology that might be able to "reach a different kind of learner."

Representatives from the BMEF begin the grant process in the fall by attending faculty meetings at the three schools.

"Grant Committee co-chairs talk with [teachers] and the administrators and let them know about the grant cycle," she explained. "It usually starts in January and runs for six weeks—during that time, grants are submitted to us."

At that point, the grant committee members meet with the superintendent and administrators to discuss the applications.

Before the applications come to a vote, "We thoroughly research the grants," said Karp.

For example, this year, a teacher who requested the Smart Response System requested a salesperson from the company provide a demo of the program. Teachers and committee members attended the demonstration before voting on the grants. 

The system, said Karp, "assess with the teachers how kids are grasping a particular concept."

Additionally, the Singapore math program that was used last year will continue, with additional training opportunities in 2011-12.

A new pilot program targeting first and second grade students with ADD and ADHD will also be instated in the fall.

"It's a particularly cutting edge grant," said Karp, "There are desks you can stand at; it really helps kids who have trouble sitting still refocus."

This type of exploratory initiative is "what's so great" about the foundation, according to Karp.

"We're pretty lucky to be a helpful positive force in the community," she said.

Here's a list of the 2011—12 grants from the Briarcliff Manor Education Foundation:

"A Look into Space" (telescope supplies) — $881
Supplies to allow and students to use an existing telescope to enable viewing of the moon during the day and opportunities for evening activities. Telescope would be available for use by all BHS and BMS science teachers and their classes.

Florescent Minerals — $352
Purchase of florescent minerals for use in middle and high school science classes. These will engage students and foster their interest inrocks and minerals.

Books on CD to Enhance Literary Skills — $2,015
This grant will allow first graders to experience literature through CDs, rather than just through the pages of standard books.

Alternative Seating Desks — $9,000
Pilot project to equip a second grade classroom with desks offering alternative seating options to address issues of inattentiveness and high levels of distractibility.

Digital Cameras — $309
Purchase of two digital cameras for kindergarten to facilitate communications with parents and to aid in classroom with curriculum, creative writing projects and sequencing activities.

Smart Document Cameras — $1,398
Purchase of two Smart Document Cameras to be used to take pictures for projection on the SmartBoard in kindergarten classrooms. Will be used with the new reading curriculum and allow for more student interaction..

Singapore Math Training — $2,300
Additional training for all Todd and 6th grade teachers to explore this method further and gain a closer look at teaching this step-by-step, visual method of translating a word problem into a diagram or model to understand and solve the problem.

Sign Language Program — $2,800
Continuation of the kindergarten Sign Language Program funded by the BMEF in 2009. A Sign Language instructor will provide half-hour sessions of sign language instruction and activities twice a month for all kindergarten classrooms. The PTA will fund $1000 of this program in partnership with the BMEF.

Greenhouse Club Jerseys — $2,205
Jerseys for Greenhouse Club members at BMS. Designed by students and worn on the day of the club and at events. Will promote concept of "greener living" and jerseys will be recycled and passed down to each year.

Smart Response System — $2,353
An exciting and innovative piece of technology, the SMART Response system works with SmartBoards using individual student remotes to allow middle school students to participate in classroom assessments throughout lessons. Teachers can compile information into a chart as a way of assessing the overall class performance on a topic.

Academia Irrigation System — $2,400
Installation of an irrigation system in the BMS Academia Outdoor Classroom to properly supply it with water. This will help to keep Academia looking beautiful and minimize unnecessary time of students, parents and teachers to attend to water issues over the summer.

iMac Computer — $1,368
Purchase of an iMac computer for use in the Arts Program at BHS. Students will be able to use to create digitalportfolios of their art for in class projects and for college applications.

“Day in Clay” Program — $3,665
A clay program, utilizing a visiting artist, at Todd to foster experimentation with a variety of building techniques while students learn to consider their ideas and adapt to change along the way to creation.

“A Christmas Carol” Field Trip — $920
BMEF funding was provided in conjunction with PTA and Boces for seventh grade students to attend production of "A Christmas Carol."

Grants Total: $31,786

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 05:07 pm
CORRECTION TO LAST POST: The last sentence should read: "Let's continue to share, butRead More face-to-face." Thx - Sonny
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 06:06 am
Thanks, Jon - you raise important considerations and in a calm, dispassionate way, which IRead More appreciate. As for alternative funding mechanisms, in hindsight I believe they should have been examined and addressed this earlier this year had the decision-making been opened up to the public in a completely bidirectional manner much earlier in this year's budget cycle. A real take-away from this situation, in my opinion, is that we in the community were not given the opportunity to sit down together with sharpened pencils in a public forum and allowed to vet and actually challenge the Administration's assumptions in order to arrive at budget alternatives with the Administration and Board. The comparison you make with Washington is indeed apt in that it reflects the way decisions have slid back to being made in a vacuum and handed down to the voters instead of in a democratic fashion based on budget-to-actuals instead of budget-to-budget figures combined with the practice of over-reserving for expense items while under-estimating revenues. Although the Board did indeed reach out to me and 2 others asking for suggestions, when we re-iterated our request for an open meeting format to include other financially savvy community members, these requests were consistently ignored. Which is why we are in the current position we are in having to decide on Tues on a tax levy cap-busting budget requiring 60% super-majority. Which the public will decide, of course, and we will live with the consequences: either it passes, or the Board and Administration will be forced to rein in the excesses. And much as I love open debate, I restate that online posting leaves does leave a lot to be desired. Let's continue to share, but not face-to-face. Respectfully - Sonny
Jon Satran May 18, 2013 at 12:16 am
Sonny, I like the idea of brainstorming together, thinking outside of the box, but there are someRead More major obstacles that I think you need to consider: 1) A Bond referendum requires a 45 days’ notice period. It cannot be presented for a vote before this year's budget process is concluded. 2) To release reserves based on the hope that a future bond vote would be successful is reckless. What happens if reserves are released and then the bond referendum fails? You would not risk your home finances with this type of risk, would you really risk your school’s financial health? 3) Our tax certiorari reserve was just recently reviewed in consultation with our attorneys and we are appropriately reserved for today’s commercial real estate market. 4) Most importantly, this proposal would create a larger and tougher tax increase next year. In other words, adding $1,000,000 of revenue this year through a loan would require replacing that revenue with an additional $1,000,000 again next year and the year after. Borrow and spend economics does not work as we have seen from the national level. Deficit spending, which has been suggested may or may not work in Washington, but it certainly does not in Briarcliff Manor. When the school’s reserves are exhausted, we will face impactful program cuts or much larger tax levy increases. Respectfully - Jon Satran
JanFisher May 17, 2013 at 10:55 pm
It is so wonderful that, recognizing the importance of STEM and following the recommendation of ourRead More educators, Sal Maglietta and Jon Satran agreed to bring on the district's first director of instructional technology.
McKey Rivers May 10, 2013 at 07:36 pm
Thank you Dr. Sternberg for your thoughtful letter. You hit on an important facet of this electionRead More few if any others have stated: electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder will provide the added benefit of diversity of thought as the Board continues to address difficult, ongoing educational and financial issues. There is a woeful absence of synergy produced by articulation of different views among the current Board members. The absence of a “check and balance” on the current Board is reflected in the inexplicable decision to cancel the May 13 BOE meeting (scheduled since last summer), which is the last meeting prior to the May 21 budget vote and board election. Is there no business for the Board to conduct at this critical juncture or could it be that the Board does not want Briarcliff residents to hear members of the community question the Board about the proposed budget right before the election? Electing either Mr. Linder and/or Mr. Wasserman will immediately benefit the public as the highest vote getter will be seated on May 22 and thus participate in formulating a second budget for public vote that, notwithstanding current BOE scare tactics, can be tax levy compliant and not involve additional program elimination or reduction. There is no doubt that electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder to the Briarcliff School Board will substantially benefit the entire Briarcliff community and provide a much needed check on Board decision making.
Herman Sexton May 10, 2013 at 03:48 pm
Electing Paul Wasserman alone would add a diversity of thought. The guy hears at least a dozenRead More voices in his head. Have you ever spoken to him? Did you pay attention when he was running for Congress for a few weeks? Ugh.
W Obermeyer May 10, 2013 at 03:41 pm
Not too diffiicult to play with figures. Look at the budget decrease and the increase in state aid,Read More then claim the budget is actually less.
Mike Valenti May 1, 2013 at 04:50 pm
Second, Mr. Sternberg comments “The previous Board reversed that trend but now a new schoolRead More Board reversed that and we are back to square one.” This is without question factually and ideologically incorrect. The previous Board, populated by Janet Marinaccio, Guy Rotundo, Eric Bashford and Rosella Ranno, were sponsored by the folks in our District who are of the fiscal conservative/tea-party-like taxation ideology. Yes, they aggressively cut the school budget over the course of their term. However, this year’s school budget is actually lower than last years. So, to suggest that the current Board has reversed tack on this issue is factually incorrect.
Mike Valenti May 1, 2013 at 04:49 pm
I commend Mr. Sternberg for his thoughtful, well written letter. However, I must take issue withRead More several of his points. First, he offers an analysis of various interests in our District and their motives regarding our school budget. If I may, here is another more simplified viewpoint. The predominance of District residents moved here for the school district (whether for its value to their children or its value for their real estate). These folks have a very supportive ideology with respect to taxation in support of the District. On the other side of the ledger stands a group who has a fiscal conservative, tea-party-like taxation ideology. They seek to cut, cut, cut with disregard to the integrity and depth of the educational program and resources. (continued)...