.
Feedback

Pace Hoops Teams Fall to New Haven

The teams fell at home at a postponed game over the weekend; they hit the road again today.

The following announcements were submitted by the Pace University Department of Athletics. To learn how to post your news on Patch, click here.

Men

PLESANTVILLE, N.Y.- Keon Williams (Hackensack, NJ/Hackensack/Iona College) recorded his sixth double-double of the season but the Setters fell to the Chargers of the University of New Haven in Northeast-10 Conference play 62-52. Pace falls to 9-12 overall and 6-11 in the NE-10, while the Chargers improve to 14-7 and 11-6 in conference play.

The Chargers led from the start and pulled ahead 19-8 midway through the opening half. The Setters rallied with a 10-2 run backed by eight points from Williams and capped off by a Jaylen Mann (Youngstown, OH/Liberty) triple to close to within three points at 21-18 with 4:41 left in the half. New Haven pushed back as they held a 30-23 lead at the break.

New Haven extended their lead early in the second half as they built a 35-25 lead in the first three minutes of play. The Setters battled back as they kept the score between five and nine points over the next eight minutes of play. Pace rallied once again as Denzel Primus-Devonish (Riverdale, MD/St. John's College) had five points in a stretch, including a key three-point play at the 8:43 mark, while Williams connected on a lay-up with 7:03 left in the contest to pull the Setters to within three point at 49-46.

The Chargers pushed the score back to eight points at 56-48 with 4:54 to play but the Setters rallied again as Williams trimmed the score to six points with under a minute to play. New Haven hit all four free throws in the final 18 seconds of the game to hold off a Setter rally.

For the Setters, Williams led the way with his sixth double-double of the season, while Jonathan Merceus (Union, NJ/Union) tallied 12 points and four rebounds. Primus-Devonish dished out five assists in the game.

The Setters return to action on Tuesday, February 12 as they travel to New Haven, CT to take on the Owls of Southern Connecticut State University for an NE-10 contest at 7:30 pm.

___

Women

Pleasantville, N.Y.- The Setters fell to the Chargers of the University of New Haven 69-59 in conference play at Goldstein Fitness Center on Sunday night.  The Setters stand at 11-10 overall and 9-8 in the Northeast-10 Conference while the Chargers advance to 10-11 overall and 9-8 in the NE-10. 

Three Setters recorded double figures as Jessica Scannell (Cork, Ireland / St. Vincents)  led the way with 17 points and added three rebounds, two assists and two steals.  Margo Hackett(Pawling, NY / Pawling) finished with 15 points, as she went 7-15 from the field and pulled down three rebounds.  Brittany Shields (Cold Spring, NY / Haldane) tallied 12 rebounds, nine points and four assists while Brianna Harris (Brentwood, NY / Mary Louis Academy) added nine rebounds.  Yuni Sher (Poughkeepsie, NY / Long Island Lutheran) finished with eight points and eight rebounds. 

Anh-Dao Tran led the Chargers with 20 points and four assists.  Brianna Bradford and Brian Moore totaled 15 points while Moore also added six rebounds.  Aquillin Hayes pulled down six rebounds and added four points, two assists, two blocks and two steals. 

Despite the loss, the Setters out-scored the Chargers in the paint 38-36, off second-chance attempts 23-12 and off the bench 11-9.  The Chargers scored four more points than the Setters off of turnovers and on fast breaks. 

The Chargers finished the game shooting 28-58 from the field, 8-18 from three-point range and 5-9 from the free-throw line while the Setters shot 25-70 from the field, 5-22 from the outside and 4-12 from the line. 

The Chargers opened up the second half going on a 13-4 run and took their largest lead of the game five minutes into the game, 46-33.  Hackett connected on a layup and the free-throw with 11:04 on the clock to come within eight points.  The Chargers held a healthy lead over the next four minutes before a triple by Scannell jump-started a Setter come-back with 3:23 on the clock.  Scannell followed with a layup to bring the Setters within five points with 2:14 in the game but wasn't enough as the Chargers connected on a triple and two free-throws to round the game out at 69-59. 

The Setters started off the game playing from behind before they were able to even out the score at 12:31.  The teams would exchange the lead before the Chargers would go on a run and take their largest lead of the first half at 4:22.  The Setters were able to minimize the point deficit as they went on a 8-0 run to go into halftime, 29-31.   

The Setters shot 34.4% from the field in the first half, and 33.3% from both three-point range and the free-throw line while the Chargers shot 40% from the field, 54.4% from the outside and 50% from the line.  The Setters out-scored the Chargers in the paint 14-10 and on second-chance attempts 11-4. 

The Setters will travel to Southern Connecticut State University to take on the Owls in conference play on Tuesday, February 12 at 5:30 pm. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 03:16 pm
The damage done by the prior BOE majority has begun a cycle of meaningful healing under the currentRead More BOE majority. Continued...
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 03:02 pm
This year’s school budget is a REDUCTION in spending by the district versus last year’sRead More budget. We are the ONLY district in Westchester to forward a reduction for our community to vote on. The reason we will slightly violate the tax-cap is due to the fiscal irresponsibility of a prior board using fund balance to cushion the budget and create the illusion of a cap-compliant budget. Please join me in re-electing Jon Satran and Sal Maglietta. Please also join me in voting YES on this year’s school budget.
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 03:01 pm
On a related note, Mr. Venditti also displays a very disturbing understanding of what drivesRead More property values here in Westchester. Property values are driven by the perceived quality of the school district and the perceived support within the district for academic excellence. For a community like Briarcliff to vote down a school budget because it raises taxes approximately $27.50/year for an $800k home is suicidal from a property value standpoint. Go ahead folks, follow the advice of Mr. Venditti and vote this school budget down, then watch your property values plummet for years to come. Continued...
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 02:53 pm
Mr. Linder, This is YOUR post folks are responding to and your ideas. I find it curious at bestRead More that you began a public forum comment blog but advocate throughout your responses that the discussion should be taken off-line and out of public view. this really doesn't position you well as an advocate for transparency.
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 05:07 pm
CORRECTION TO LAST POST: The last sentence should read: "Let's continue to share, butRead More face-to-face." Thx - Sonny
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 06:06 am
Thanks, Jon - you raise important considerations and in a calm, dispassionate way, which IRead More appreciate. As for alternative funding mechanisms, in hindsight I believe they should have been examined and addressed this earlier this year had the decision-making been opened up to the public in a completely bidirectional manner much earlier in this year's budget cycle. A real take-away from this situation, in my opinion, is that we in the community were not given the opportunity to sit down together with sharpened pencils in a public forum and allowed to vet and actually challenge the Administration's assumptions in order to arrive at budget alternatives with the Administration and Board. The comparison you make with Washington is indeed apt in that it reflects the way decisions have slid back to being made in a vacuum and handed down to the voters instead of in a democratic fashion based on budget-to-actuals instead of budget-to-budget figures combined with the practice of over-reserving for expense items while under-estimating revenues. Although the Board did indeed reach out to me and 2 others asking for suggestions, when we re-iterated our request for an open meeting format to include other financially savvy community members, these requests were consistently ignored. Which is why we are in the current position we are in having to decide on Tues on a tax levy cap-busting budget requiring 60% super-majority. Which the public will decide, of course, and we will live with the consequences: either it passes, or the Board and Administration will be forced to rein in the excesses. And much as I love open debate, I restate that online posting leaves does leave a lot to be desired. Let's continue to share, but not face-to-face. Respectfully - Sonny
JanFisher May 17, 2013 at 10:55 pm
It is so wonderful that, recognizing the importance of STEM and following the recommendation of ourRead More educators, Sal Maglietta and Jon Satran agreed to bring on the district's first director of instructional technology.
McKey Rivers May 10, 2013 at 07:36 pm
Thank you Dr. Sternberg for your thoughtful letter. You hit on an important facet of this electionRead More few if any others have stated: electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder will provide the added benefit of diversity of thought as the Board continues to address difficult, ongoing educational and financial issues. There is a woeful absence of synergy produced by articulation of different views among the current Board members. The absence of a “check and balance” on the current Board is reflected in the inexplicable decision to cancel the May 13 BOE meeting (scheduled since last summer), which is the last meeting prior to the May 21 budget vote and board election. Is there no business for the Board to conduct at this critical juncture or could it be that the Board does not want Briarcliff residents to hear members of the community question the Board about the proposed budget right before the election? Electing either Mr. Linder and/or Mr. Wasserman will immediately benefit the public as the highest vote getter will be seated on May 22 and thus participate in formulating a second budget for public vote that, notwithstanding current BOE scare tactics, can be tax levy compliant and not involve additional program elimination or reduction. There is no doubt that electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder to the Briarcliff School Board will substantially benefit the entire Briarcliff community and provide a much needed check on Board decision making.
Herman Sexton May 10, 2013 at 03:48 pm
Electing Paul Wasserman alone would add a diversity of thought. The guy hears at least a dozenRead More voices in his head. Have you ever spoken to him? Did you pay attention when he was running for Congress for a few weeks? Ugh.