.
Feedback

Stonehill Teams Best Pace Basketball

The men and women Pace University basketball teams came up short at home Saturday.

The following announcements were submitted by the Pace University Department of Athletics. To learn how to post your news on Patch, click here.

Men

PLEASANTVILLE, N.Y.- The Setters fell to the Skyhawks  of Stonehill College 61-58 in Northeast-10 Conference action. Pace falls to 9-10 overall and 6-9 in the NE-10, while the Skyhawks improve to 10-9 and 6-9 in conference play.

The Setters jumped out to an 8-2 lead as Denzel Primus-Devonish (Riverdale, MD/St. John's College) netted six of the Pace's eight points in the first five minutes of action. Stonehill rallied as they scored the next 15 points to take a 17-10 lead and pulled ahead by as much as 12 points with 5:57 left in the half. Pace answered with a 14-5 run to close out the half capped off by three free throws by Primus-Devonish with :00 on the clock as he was fouled on a three-point attempt as time expired in the first half to pull the Setters to within three points at 29-26 at the break.

The Skyhawks extended their lead to seven points early in the second half but pulled to within a point at 34-33 on a pair of Keon Williams (Hackensack, NJ/Hackensack/Iona College) free throws. Stonehill maintained a slim lead over the next four minutes but pushed their lead to 54-45 with 4:36 left in the game. The Setters proceeded to chip away as they pulled to within a point at 59-58 with :11.8 seconds left on a Primus-Devonish triple. Stonehill hit a pair of free throws in the final seconds to hold on for the win.

For the Setters, Williams posted a double-double with 15 points and 11 rebounds, while Primus-Devonish led all scorers with 20 points along with four boards, three assists and five steals.Jonathan Merceus (Union, NJ/Union) totaled 15 points, six rebounds and three steals.

The Setters will travel to Springfield MA to face the Yellow Jackets of American International College on Wednesday, February 6 at 7:30 pm.

Women

Pleasantville, N.Y.-The Setters fell in overtime to the Skyhawks of Stonehill College 50-54 in conference play at Goldstein Fitness Center.  The Setters fall to 10-9 overall and 8-7 in the NE-10 while the Skyhawks advance to 17-2 overall and 13-2 in conference play. 

Brittany Shields (Cold Spring, NY / Haldane) made the pivotal layup to tie the score with 0.09 seconds to go in regulation to send the Setters into overtime.  The Setters fell early into overtime but were right in it till the end as Shields made a free-throw with 0.07 seconds to go to make the score 50-53.  Mary Louise Dixon converted on a free-throw to solidify the win 54-50.  The Skyhawks shot 2-4 from the field and 4-8 from the line in OT while the Setters finished 1-9 from the field and 2-4 from the line. 

The Setters out-shot the Skyhawks 24-22 in the paint, 9-6 on second-chance attempts and 17-6 from the bench in 45:00 of play.  The Setters went 19-67 from the field, 3-17 from three-point range and 9-18 from the free-throw line while the Skyhawks finished at 19-59 from the field, 6-23 from the outside and 10-16 from the line. 

Yuni Sher (Poughkeepsie, NY / Long Island Lutheran) led the Setters in scoring with 14 points on 6-14 from the field and added six rebounds.  Shields finished with 10 points, nine rebounds and three assists while Allison Cleary (New Windsor, NY / Cornwall Central) contributed nine points and nine rebounds.  Jessica Scannell (Cork, Ireland / St. Vincents) rounded out with six points, six rebounds and three assists. 

Tori Faieta led the Skyhawks with 16 points and 11 rebounds while Asia Ewing came not far behind with 11 points, 12 rebounds and four assists.  Dixon added 11 points and nine rebounds. 

Despite the loss, the Setters made an impressive second-half effort, taking the lead by one on a jumper by Sher, 44-43 with .41 seconds to go.  The Setters had their largest lead of the game halfway through the second half, by two points on a jump-shot from Sher.  The Setters kept within five points throughout the entire start of the half in attempt for that lead. 

Pace out-shot the Skyhawks in the second half 14-8 in the paint, 7-2 on second-chance attempts and 12-3 off the bench. 

Both teams started the game off aggressively allowing no more than a six point differential in the first fourteen minutes of play.  The Skyhawks took their largest lead of the game at 6:49 on a triple by Paige Marshall.  The Setters tried to chip away but the Skyhawks managed to maintain a seven point lead with 3:38 to go in the half.  Cleary connected on a triple with 2:46 to go to bring the Setters within four points before the Skyhawks answered with .34 seconds to go into halftime ahead, 25-19. 

The Setters travel to take on the Yellow Jackets of American International College Wednesday, February 6 for a 5:30 pm conference match-up. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 05:07 pm
CORRECTION TO LAST POST: The last sentence should read: "Let's continue to share, butRead More face-to-face." Thx - Sonny
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 06:06 am
Thanks, Jon - you raise important considerations and in a calm, dispassionate way, which IRead More appreciate. As for alternative funding mechanisms, in hindsight I believe they should have been examined and addressed this earlier this year had the decision-making been opened up to the public in a completely bidirectional manner much earlier in this year's budget cycle. A real take-away from this situation, in my opinion, is that we in the community were not given the opportunity to sit down together with sharpened pencils in a public forum and allowed to vet and actually challenge the Administration's assumptions in order to arrive at budget alternatives with the Administration and Board. The comparison you make with Washington is indeed apt in that it reflects the way decisions have slid back to being made in a vacuum and handed down to the voters instead of in a democratic fashion based on budget-to-actuals instead of budget-to-budget figures combined with the practice of over-reserving for expense items while under-estimating revenues. Although the Board did indeed reach out to me and 2 others asking for suggestions, when we re-iterated our request for an open meeting format to include other financially savvy community members, these requests were consistently ignored. Which is why we are in the current position we are in having to decide on Tues on a tax levy cap-busting budget requiring 60% super-majority. Which the public will decide, of course, and we will live with the consequences: either it passes, or the Board and Administration will be forced to rein in the excesses. And much as I love open debate, I restate that online posting leaves does leave a lot to be desired. Let's continue to share, but not face-to-face. Respectfully - Sonny
Jon Satran May 18, 2013 at 12:16 am
Sonny, I like the idea of brainstorming together, thinking outside of the box, but there are someRead More major obstacles that I think you need to consider: 1) A Bond referendum requires a 45 days’ notice period. It cannot be presented for a vote before this year's budget process is concluded. 2) To release reserves based on the hope that a future bond vote would be successful is reckless. What happens if reserves are released and then the bond referendum fails? You would not risk your home finances with this type of risk, would you really risk your school’s financial health? 3) Our tax certiorari reserve was just recently reviewed in consultation with our attorneys and we are appropriately reserved for today’s commercial real estate market. 4) Most importantly, this proposal would create a larger and tougher tax increase next year. In other words, adding $1,000,000 of revenue this year through a loan would require replacing that revenue with an additional $1,000,000 again next year and the year after. Borrow and spend economics does not work as we have seen from the national level. Deficit spending, which has been suggested may or may not work in Washington, but it certainly does not in Briarcliff Manor. When the school’s reserves are exhausted, we will face impactful program cuts or much larger tax levy increases. Respectfully - Jon Satran
JanFisher May 17, 2013 at 10:55 pm
It is so wonderful that, recognizing the importance of STEM and following the recommendation of ourRead More educators, Sal Maglietta and Jon Satran agreed to bring on the district's first director of instructional technology.
McKey Rivers May 10, 2013 at 07:36 pm
Thank you Dr. Sternberg for your thoughtful letter. You hit on an important facet of this electionRead More few if any others have stated: electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder will provide the added benefit of diversity of thought as the Board continues to address difficult, ongoing educational and financial issues. There is a woeful absence of synergy produced by articulation of different views among the current Board members. The absence of a “check and balance” on the current Board is reflected in the inexplicable decision to cancel the May 13 BOE meeting (scheduled since last summer), which is the last meeting prior to the May 21 budget vote and board election. Is there no business for the Board to conduct at this critical juncture or could it be that the Board does not want Briarcliff residents to hear members of the community question the Board about the proposed budget right before the election? Electing either Mr. Linder and/or Mr. Wasserman will immediately benefit the public as the highest vote getter will be seated on May 22 and thus participate in formulating a second budget for public vote that, notwithstanding current BOE scare tactics, can be tax levy compliant and not involve additional program elimination or reduction. There is no doubt that electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder to the Briarcliff School Board will substantially benefit the entire Briarcliff community and provide a much needed check on Board decision making.
Herman Sexton May 10, 2013 at 03:48 pm
Electing Paul Wasserman alone would add a diversity of thought. The guy hears at least a dozenRead More voices in his head. Have you ever spoken to him? Did you pay attention when he was running for Congress for a few weeks? Ugh.
W Obermeyer May 10, 2013 at 03:41 pm
Not too diffiicult to play with figures. Look at the budget decrease and the increase in state aid,Read More then claim the budget is actually less.
Mike Valenti May 1, 2013 at 04:50 pm
Second, Mr. Sternberg comments “The previous Board reversed that trend but now a new schoolRead More Board reversed that and we are back to square one.” This is without question factually and ideologically incorrect. The previous Board, populated by Janet Marinaccio, Guy Rotundo, Eric Bashford and Rosella Ranno, were sponsored by the folks in our District who are of the fiscal conservative/tea-party-like taxation ideology. Yes, they aggressively cut the school budget over the course of their term. However, this year’s school budget is actually lower than last years. So, to suggest that the current Board has reversed tack on this issue is factually incorrect.
Mike Valenti May 1, 2013 at 04:49 pm
I commend Mr. Sternberg for his thoughtful, well written letter. However, I must take issue withRead More several of his points. First, he offers an analysis of various interests in our District and their motives regarding our school budget. If I may, here is another more simplified viewpoint. The predominance of District residents moved here for the school district (whether for its value to their children or its value for their real estate). These folks have a very supportive ideology with respect to taxation in support of the District. On the other side of the ledger stands a group who has a fiscal conservative, tea-party-like taxation ideology. They seek to cut, cut, cut with disregard to the integrity and depth of the educational program and resources. (continued)...