.
Feedback

Avoid Going Broke Paying for Your Kids’ Activities

Here are a few tips that can help you identify the costs and rein them in.

Half a decade ago, kids honed their athletic skills at the neighborhood park. Now, organized sports teams, camps and clinics have replaced parks and pick-up games. What’s more the cost of youth athletics, like many consumer products, has dramatically increased.

In addition to team fees, there’s often pressure to buy expensive equipment and to pay for private lessons and pricey camps. Plus, the extras—such as out-of-town weekend tournaments, embroidered sweatshirts, team photos and post-game celebrations—can put unexpected strain your pocketbook.

But the cost of kids’ activities doesn’t begin or end with sports. Art, foreign language, dance and music lessons are among the seemingly endless list of extracurricular activities designed to enrich children’s lives. And the cost of these activities doesn’t follow the school calendar.

Summertime fun is also a big business: paying for day trips, educational and arts programming, day and overnight camps, pool and club memberships and other activities can add up, especially in families with multiple children.

So, it’s not surprising that many parents struggle with the question of how to provide their children with opportunities to grow physically and emotionally without breaking the bank. Here are a few tips that can help you identify the costs and rein them in.

  • Know your budget — Determine how much you can afford to spend on kids’ activities. Start by making sure that you’ve put aside cash for your family’s short-term financial stability, roughly enough to cover six months of living expenses if a job loss or other family emergency occurs. Also be sure that you are saving enough for retirement and future goals. Then, determine how much of your remaining flexible income you can—and want to—spend on your children’s activities.
  • Evaluate your goals and expectations for activity — Identify what level of play or involvement makes the most sense given your child’s time, talent and interest, and your budget. For example, an intramural sports team may be more affordable than a travelling team because intramural teams typically have fewer practices, games and travel expenses, which helps reduce costs.
  • Assess an activity’s actual cost — Start by talking with the instructor. In addition to a registration fee, there may be other expenses—such as uniforms, equipment, event tickets, travel and year-end gifts—that aren’t immediately apparent. Gathering this information will help you understand the activity’s total cost and whether it fits your budget before it’s too late.
  • Prioritize the options — Sit down with your child and list all of the activities he or she is involved in or would like to sign up for. Then identify which activities are your best investments by asking your child to rank those activities from the ones they like most to those they like least. When your children are old enough to understand the value of a dollar, discuss the amount set aside for their activities and help them decide if they want to participate in one or two more expensive pursuits or several less expensive ones.
  • Spend equally or close to it — Budget the same number of dollars to each child’s extracurricular activities and stick as close to that number as possible to help prevent feelings of unfairness among siblings.
  • Help reduce activity costs — Use parent meetings as an opportunity to ask important questions to the group. Do the kids really need new warm-ups every year? Can out-of-town travel be limited to one trip (or none) per season? Can a carpool be organized to help save time and money? 
  • Share costs — Consider requiring your children to cover a portion of the extracurricular expenses when they are old enough to earn money by working part-time or doing odd jobs. This will help them learn to budget their own dollars while helping to lighten your financial load.

Match what you spend

Even though your child’s high school graduation date may seem far off, it will arrive sooner than you think. So for every dollar you spend on an extracurricular activity today, invest the same amount for your child’s post-secondary education if you’re able. Doing so will help ensure that long-term education goals for your child aren’t compromised by your current investment in their personal development.

___

Due to industry regulations, I cannot respond to your questions and comments underneath my blog, but please feel free to contact me directly via email at Steven.B.Gross@ampf.com or via phone at 914-923-6490 ext. 310. This communication is published in the United States for residents of New York only; and this advisor is licensed only in the states of PA, CT, MD, GA, NJ, NC, FL, MA, ME.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lisa Jenner May 19, 2013 at 05:57 pm
I also agree with Mr. Venditti with his assessment that more money does not necessarily mean betterRead More education. The districts to which we like to compare ourselves outperform us in many areas, and they do so at a better cost. Our BOE and administrative team need to look at other districts and learn from them.
Lisa Jenner May 19, 2013 at 05:51 pm
I agree with Mr. Venditti regarding the tax burden in Briarcliff, and, as usual, I disagree with Mr.Read More Valenti. My oldest son, a Briarcliff High School graduate, has secured a job in Westchester and is looking to purchase his first home. Briarcliff is not even in the running for him, because the taxes are so high. He is looking in nearby communities where the taxes are not so burdensome. While this story is anecdotal, it does support the statement that potential buyers steer clear of Briarcliff because of the taxes.
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 04:59 pm
Mr. Venditti and his crew are the same folks who sponsored the likes of Janet Marinaccio, GuyRead More Rotundo, Eric Bashford and Rosella Ranno. The community has spoken loud and clear in the last several elections as candidates sponsored by this group have been soundly defeated. The track records (and more importantly the comportment) of the aforementioned board members spoke volumes as to the agenda of this group. They are out of touch and out of clout. The community has made it clear that candidates sponsored by this group must never again control our school board. Continued...
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 02:53 pm
Mr. Linder, This is YOUR post folks are responding to and your ideas. I find it curious at bestRead More that you began a public forum comment blog but advocate throughout your responses that the discussion should be taken off-line and out of public view. this really doesn't position you well as an advocate for transparency.
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 05:07 pm
CORRECTION TO LAST POST: The last sentence should read: "Let's continue to share, butRead More face-to-face." Thx - Sonny
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 06:06 am
Thanks, Jon - you raise important considerations and in a calm, dispassionate way, which IRead More appreciate. As for alternative funding mechanisms, in hindsight I believe they should have been examined and addressed this earlier this year had the decision-making been opened up to the public in a completely bidirectional manner much earlier in this year's budget cycle. A real take-away from this situation, in my opinion, is that we in the community were not given the opportunity to sit down together with sharpened pencils in a public forum and allowed to vet and actually challenge the Administration's assumptions in order to arrive at budget alternatives with the Administration and Board. The comparison you make with Washington is indeed apt in that it reflects the way decisions have slid back to being made in a vacuum and handed down to the voters instead of in a democratic fashion based on budget-to-actuals instead of budget-to-budget figures combined with the practice of over-reserving for expense items while under-estimating revenues. Although the Board did indeed reach out to me and 2 others asking for suggestions, when we re-iterated our request for an open meeting format to include other financially savvy community members, these requests were consistently ignored. Which is why we are in the current position we are in having to decide on Tues on a tax levy cap-busting budget requiring 60% super-majority. Which the public will decide, of course, and we will live with the consequences: either it passes, or the Board and Administration will be forced to rein in the excesses. And much as I love open debate, I restate that online posting leaves does leave a lot to be desired. Let's continue to share, but not face-to-face. Respectfully - Sonny
JanFisher May 17, 2013 at 10:55 pm
It is so wonderful that, recognizing the importance of STEM and following the recommendation of ourRead More educators, Sal Maglietta and Jon Satran agreed to bring on the district's first director of instructional technology.
McKey Rivers May 10, 2013 at 07:36 pm
Thank you Dr. Sternberg for your thoughtful letter. You hit on an important facet of this electionRead More few if any others have stated: electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder will provide the added benefit of diversity of thought as the Board continues to address difficult, ongoing educational and financial issues. There is a woeful absence of synergy produced by articulation of different views among the current Board members. The absence of a “check and balance” on the current Board is reflected in the inexplicable decision to cancel the May 13 BOE meeting (scheduled since last summer), which is the last meeting prior to the May 21 budget vote and board election. Is there no business for the Board to conduct at this critical juncture or could it be that the Board does not want Briarcliff residents to hear members of the community question the Board about the proposed budget right before the election? Electing either Mr. Linder and/or Mr. Wasserman will immediately benefit the public as the highest vote getter will be seated on May 22 and thus participate in formulating a second budget for public vote that, notwithstanding current BOE scare tactics, can be tax levy compliant and not involve additional program elimination or reduction. There is no doubt that electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder to the Briarcliff School Board will substantially benefit the entire Briarcliff community and provide a much needed check on Board decision making.
Herman Sexton May 10, 2013 at 03:48 pm
Electing Paul Wasserman alone would add a diversity of thought. The guy hears at least a dozenRead More voices in his head. Have you ever spoken to him? Did you pay attention when he was running for Congress for a few weeks? Ugh.