.
Feedback

Making the Most of Your Bonus or Raise

Resolve to take extra care with your bonus or raise this year and make sure to get the most of it.

If you’re receiving a raise or a bonus this year, you may feel a little bit wealthier when you see your suddenly inflated bank account or paycheck. But it’s no secret that this money can disappear quickly.

Resolve to take extra care with your bonus or raise this year and make sure to get the most of it. This requires you to think beyond the new flat screen TV or summer vacation, and consider how the extra money could help you in the long run.

The extra tax hit

A boost in your wages this year won’t mean quite as much as it did in the past due to the rise in payroll taxes. Any raise or bonus you receive is subject to payroll taxes, which increased for all wage earners and those who are self-employed in 2013. The employee’s share of the Social Security payroll tax has reverted to 6.2 percent for 2013 after being reduced to 4.2 percent in the two previous years. That means you’ll have $20 less in take home pay for every $1,000 you earn. The tax applies to the first $113,700 of income earned in 2013. In short, this tax increase may counteract a boost to your paycheck to some extent, depending on your circumstance.

For those at higher income levels, additional taxes may be incurred:

  • The addition Medicare surtax of 0.9 percent. This applies to wage or self-employment income over $200,000 for single tax filers and above $250,000 for married couples filing a joint return.
  • A higher federal income tax rate of 39.6 percent applies for taxable incomes above $400,000 for single taxpayers and above $450,000 for married couples filing jointly. This is higher than the 35 percent rate that applied in prior years.

Virtually all wage earners will feel the extra tax hit in 2013.

Maximizing the impact

Once you’ve calculated the “take-home” value of your bonus or raise, it comes down to a matter of spending the money now, paying down existing debt, saving and investing it, or a combination of the three.

After receiving a bonus check, it’s often tempting to make a purchase of something that’s long been on your wish list. Before you do, think about whether that money could have more impact in other ways.

If you have significant debts, particularly high interest credit cards or other loans, you may want to use some of the extra cash to pay down those loans and dramatically reduce future interest costs. The faster you can eliminate debt, the more money you will have left from your paycheck for other purposes.

Alternatively, you can apply some of the extra money to help achieve your key financial goals. These can include:

•     Having sufficient emergency cash reserves in place (you should have enough to cover at least three to six months of expenses).

•     Investing more money for long-term goals like retirement or your childrens’ education

•     Increasing the level of insurance coverage you have in place to prepare for the unexpected, such as death, disability or medical needs.

Getting more from your raise

If you’ve received your annual salary increase, the change to your bottom line is more gradual, but it also means you can take steps to steadily improve your long-term financial outlook. You could consider:

•     boosting pre-tax deferrals into your workplace retirement savings plan;

•     devoting a portion of the increase to other retirement savings, such as an IRA; or

•     directing more money to other investment accounts, such as a 529 college savings plan

Every dollar invested this year has the opportunity to grow as time passes. That is a powerful way to multiply the impact of this year’s pay hike.   

___

Due to industry regulations, I cannot respond to your questions and comments underneath my blog, but please feel free to contact me directly via email at Steven.B.Gross@ampf.com or via phone at 914-923-6490 ext. 310. This communication is published in the United States for residents of New York only; and this advisor is licensed only in the states of PA, CT, MD, GA, NJ, NC, FL, MA, ME.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
W Obermeyer May 20, 2013 at 02:58 pm
What a record! I do not favor personalized targeting, but it seems the chickens have come home toRead More roost. Perhaps attendance is optional?
McKey Rivers May 20, 2013 at 02:40 pm
Is there a style manual or other guidance addressing the random use of capital letters in posts onRead More this web site? Has anyone figured why Mr. Valenti capitalizes certain words and for what purpose? Mr. Ranno's post contains relevant, objective facts without the varnish of partisanship. The State Education law and School District policy address attendance by school board members at Board meetings, including provisions when a board member is disqualified from office due to poor attendance. Does anyone on the current Board have the fortitude to address Mr. Maglietta's miserable attendance record? Does Mr. Maglietta have the moral compass to realize that for whatever reason he is unable to fulfill the most basic requirement of a school board member, i.e., attendance at board meetings? My guess is the answer to both questions is NO and that it is now up to the voters to take matters into their own hands.
Lisa Jenner May 20, 2013 at 02:04 pm
As I have stated before, there is something very dysfunctional about the way the Briarcliff schoolRead More district operates. In all three districts in which I have worked (Pelham, Pleasantville, Rye), I have never seen anything like what goes on here. The members of the BOE are supposed to be trustees, representing the tax-payers. In the aforementioned districts, the BOE held the Superintendent's feet to the fire to bring in the best possible education in the most cost effective way. In turn, the Superintendent pressured the building administrators to do the same. When we have a board that tries to do that (Marinacchio, Bashford, Rotundo, Ranno), they are vilified as being fiscally irresponsible and wreaking havoc on the education of our children. In other districts, the BOE does not hold hands with the administrators and teachers and sing Kumbaya. I could vote for this model if it worked, but the fact of the matter is that we have just about the highest per pupil expenditure in the county, with results that don't match.
W Obermeyer May 20, 2013 at 03:07 pm
I wonder why the voice of reason is suddenly so vocal? Reminds me of some earlier exchanges, if youRead More have read one you have read them all.
The Real Herman Sexton May 20, 2013 at 02:57 pm
oh wow, let's relive the attempted election of Mike Valenti several years ago. We went throughRead More this, proved I was a resident, etc. Anyway, does anyone know anyone in Briarcliff more annoying than Mike Valenti
Mike Valenti May 20, 2013 at 02:40 pm
Does anyone personally know anyone in Briarcliff named Herman Sexton? Be careful folks. Too manyRead More phony names and email addresses seem to surface in support of candidates this group forwards and supports for school board.
W Obermeyer May 20, 2013 at 03:13 pm
One can fool some of the people some of the time, but not all of the people all of the time. And byRead More repeating something ad nauseum it does not become true or a fact ...
Mike Valenti May 20, 2013 at 02:57 pm
Ladies and gentleman, please be cautious. Does ANYONE in Briarcliff personally know anyone namedRead More Herman Sexton or McKey Rivers. And, again I state, the comments above typify the caliber, comportment and ideology of the individuals supporting Mr. Wasserman and Mr. Linder. The choice looks fairly clear to me. Please join me in casting your votes for Jon Satran and Sal Maglietta tomorrow as well as voting yes on our school budget.
McKey Rivers May 20, 2013 at 02:51 pm
I just felt nauseous realizing that the source of the campaign nonsense published earlier today byRead More the Briarcliff PTA is Mike Valenti! Who other than Valenti and the BPTA Board, where Mrs. Maglietta sits as Vice President, actually believes that a vote to get the School Board to formulate a tax levy compliant budget, just like almost every other school board in the region and State, will send a message that Briarcliff does not support it's public schools? How can anyone possibly buy into this nonsense when data provided by the NYS Comptroller shows that the the current effective school tax rate is substantially higher in Briarcliff than almost every school district in the County, including 46.18% higher than Bronxville? Briarcliff PTA, if you are going to violate NYS PTA policy and guidance on lobbying and campaigning in the budget vote, and possibly risk IRS action because of potential contradiction of restrictions on lobbying by an educational organization, pick someone more stable and intelligent than Mike Valenti to rely on.
W Obermeyer May 20, 2013 at 03:04 pm
This is without a doubt one of the more reasonable and interesting articles posted. No claims ofRead More representing the community, no baseless assertions of how the world outside will view Braircliff Manor of the vote goes this way or another, and best of all - no puppeteering.
The Real Herman Sexton May 20, 2013 at 11:45 am
Valenti- go away and leave us alone. You failed to win when you ran, you failed to get yourselfRead More appointed to the board for a vacated seat. You are the least respected resident in town and walk around as a self important genius. Were not you arrested a short time ago? Please back off and perhaps the election will be decided by intelligent residents. VOTE NO for whatever Valenti says to vote for
Mike Valenti May 20, 2013 at 11:34 am
It's no wonder Linder and Wasserman's campaign is imploding. Just listen to the blend of venom andRead More bile spewed by their desperate supporters. This election is as much about respect and civility as any other issue. It has been made clear throughout this campaign that Wasserman, Linder and their supporters will reverse us back to the troublesome place we were a few years ago. The desperation in your viscious and unbecoming attacks is palpable. And, ladies and gentleman, it it ain't broke don't fix it!!
Lisa Jenner May 20, 2013 at 01:53 pm
There goes Mike again, with his crystal ball and his ability to read minds - the voice of theRead More Briarcliff community. He knows that the Linder/Wasserman camp is desperate and that their campaign is imploding. I, too, have been wondering about the mailings from the school district regarding the budget. While I realize that the current BOE needs to present and explain the budget to the public, some of the material comes dangerously close to campaign materials.
McKey Rivers May 20, 2013 at 11:33 am
Is Mrs. Maglietta incapable of speaking for herself? Or is Sal showing off his new found knowledgeRead More about when it is appropriate to recuse yourself from voting on a matter when you have an actual self interest or a perceived self interest? And will the Magliettas reimburse the school district for the campaign materials they have been sending at public expense and on School District letter head?
Mike Valenti May 20, 2013 at 11:28 am
It is clear that the current BOE has accomplished a vital and productive partnership with ourRead More faculty and vendors. This accomplishment is bearing fruit for the community before our eyes. Teachers and vendors have become partners with the district and morale has been restored from the troublesome levels it sank to several years ago under the previous BOE. The desperation of the Linder/Wasserman camp, as their campaign implodes, is both palpable. Moreover, it is simply a group of folks in the community once again showing their true colors as their final desperate hours of negative campaigning come to a close.
W Obermeyer May 20, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Well written post, with a realistic analysis of the property market. Very few young people willRead More consider Briarcliff Manor a viable option for purchasing a home, particularly if one can get similar education while paying much less in taxes. The decline in enrollment testifies to this unfortunate situation. And to increase the tax rate at this juncture is not only unnecessary but the poorest possible timing for slowly recovering real estate values.
McKey Rivers May 20, 2013 at 12:41 pm
According to data on file with the NYS Comptroller’s office, the current effective school taxRead More rate in Briarcliff Manor is 8.32% higher than the effective school tax rate in Chappaqua, 8.39% higher than the effective school tax rate in Tuckahoe, 16.13% higher than effective school tax rate in Eastchester, and 46.18% higher than effective school tax rate in Bronxville. Last time I checked (on Friday), none of those communities are suffering from plummeting home values or perceived to be engaged in educational suicide. What distinguishes Briarcliff from those school districts? All the other school districts have adopted tax levy cap compliant budgets. None of the other school districts have proposed to increase public relations expenses by 45%, expenses related to the superintendent of schools by 42.45%, nor expenses for the board of education by approximately 65%. None of the school boards in Chappaqua, Tuckahoe, Eastchester, and Bronxville have campaigned for voter approval of their proposed budgets by using school district resources to scare voters into believing bogus claims that a No vote will require draconian cuts in educational programs and staff. Obviously, if Briarcliff voters adopt the tax excessive proposed budget, the disparity in effective tax rates between Briarcliff and these other school districts will be even greater than it is now. Are potential homebuyers likely to disregard the wide differences in school taxes among these and almost every other community in Westchester County as compared with the school tax rates in Briarcliff? As a proponent of giving the Briarcliff Board of Education a second opportunity to get the school budget right and not overburden Briarcliff property owners with higher than necessary property taxes, I can only hope that voters will decide how to vote based on the reputation of David Venditti versus Mike Valenti.
The Real Herman Sexton May 20, 2013 at 12:17 pm
Don't we all wish that Valenti would shut up?
Mike Valenti May 20, 2013 at 11:35 am
It's no wonder Linder and Wasserman's campaign is imploding. Just listen to the blend of venom andRead More bile spewed by their desperate supporters. This election is as much about respect and civility as any other issue. It has been made clear throughout this campaign that Wasserman, Linder and their supporters will reverse us back to the troublesome place we were a few years ago. The desperation in your viscious and unbecoming attacks is palpable. And, ladies and gentleman, it it ain't broke don't fix it!!
The Real Herman Sexton May 20, 2013 at 10:39 am
First off, I am the real Herman Sexton. I am not the fraud who wrote his stupid comments earlier inRead More this blog. I am the man who destroyed Mr. Valenti's campaign several years ago. OK so let's start by laughing at the request by Mr. Valenti for transparency. He backs Mr. Satran who was a part of the team that secretly imposed a tax hike and appointed a new superintendent. How could you listen to Mr. Valenti. He asks for transparency? LETS FIX THIS NOW!
robin May 20, 2013 at 06:44 am
If I may also point out that the "3 minute rule" was instituted by the previous board.Read More This same board also moved public comment to the beginning of the meeting. And while this may have worked well if you were a mind reader and knew what was going to be discussed, it makes far more sense to have public comment after presentations and board discussions. The current board, under the leadership of Sal Maglietta, has allowed for public comment multiple times in the same meeting. They are most certainly listening to what the community has to say. Please join me and my family in re-electing Jon Satran and Sal Maglietta. Please also join us in voting YES on the school budget.
The Real Herman Sexton May 20, 2013 at 10:26 am
First off, I am the real Herman Sexton. I am not the fraud who wrote his stupid comments earlier inRead More this blog. I am the man who destroyed Mr. Valenti's campaign several years ago. OK so let's start by laughing at the request by Mr. Valenti for transparency. He backs Mr. Satran who was a part of the team that secretly imposed a tax hike and appointed a new superintendent. How could you Mr. Valenti ask for transparency? OK, so Mr Linder makes dumb points, he is clearly Mr. Wasserman's puppet and yes Mr. Nadler did see this and point it out. The real Herman Sexton is OK with Wasserman and Linder since I do believe that they would be transparent. Linder simply wants to discuss on a more personal level. He and Wasserman are down to earth, warm and enjoy face to face. You, Mr. Valenti once again prove to be the biggest thorn in the side of Sal and John. You Mr. Valenti constantly pontificate upon BS. Your lack of understanding comes through each and every stroke of your keyboard. Don't back the CIA and ask them to release their files to the public. Reality, if we elect a group of board members, we should be notified of their inner workings. Make all decisions public and allow us a voice in our schools. Only one point makes sense, A TAX INCREASE HURTS OUR PROPERTY VALUE AND DOES NOT IMPROVE SCHOOLS. Let's use Edgemont as a model, small school, similar demographics and much less spending per student, yet they perform at a higher level. LETS FIX THIS NOW!
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 02:53 pm
Mr. Linder, This is YOUR post folks are responding to and your ideas. I find it curious at bestRead More that you began a public forum comment blog but advocate throughout your responses that the discussion should be taken off-line and out of public view. this really doesn't position you well as an advocate for transparency.
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 05:07 pm
CORRECTION TO LAST POST: The last sentence should read: "Let's continue to share, butRead More face-to-face." Thx - Sonny
JanFisher May 17, 2013 at 10:55 pm
It is so wonderful that, recognizing the importance of STEM and following the recommendation of ourRead More educators, Sal Maglietta and Jon Satran agreed to bring on the district's first director of instructional technology.
Mike Valenti May 19, 2013 at 09:53 pm
BOTH JON AND SAL have demonstrated as BOE trustees their unwavering commitment to EDUCATIONALRead More EXCELLENCE, FISCAL PRUDENCE, TRANSPARENCY, RESPECT, COMMUNITY VOICE, COLLABORATION, CIVILITY and MUCH MORE. JON AND SAL’s record speaks for itself. Their comportment during this campaign reinforces that THEY embody the QUALITIES and SKILL-SET to continue to represent US and OUR school district. Under the CURRENT BOE’s leadership, our district has restored levels of TRANSPARENCY, RESPECT, COMMUNITY VOICE, COLLABORATION and MORALE that had deteriorated substantially under the previous BOE majority. They have done this while also maintaining extreme fiscal prudence (we are the ONLY district in the County to produce a year over year budget reduction for our community to vote on) and while making decisions ONLY after having ALL of the FACTS and listening to ALL constituencies. THE FACT OF THE MATTER is that JON AND SAL deserve BOTH of YOUR votes on Tuesday, as does the budget.