.
Feedback

Tax Planning in a Lower Tax Environment

A review of your finances before the end of the year is always a good practice, and often assessing tax-saving strategies is part of the process.

A review of your finances before the end of the year is always a good practice, and often assessing tax-saving strategies is part of the process. This year is a particularly challenging year to do this because of the last-minute negotiations taking place around the “fiscal cliff.” This is the combination of tax increases and spending cuts at the federal level set to kick in on January 1, 2013.

We usually know how tax laws will change as we conduct year-end planning, but this year is different since many believe that laws currently scheduled to go into effect at the start of 2013 will, in fact, be altered before or soon after they take effect.

Changes that could happen

Here is a broad overview of some of the key tax changes that are set to take effect at the start of 2013 unless policymakers in Washington agree to a different approach:

•     Higher income tax rates will apply to all taxpayers (other than corporations).

•     The employee’s share of payroll taxes (in this case, the Social Security tax) will return to the standard 6.2 percent rate from the 4.2 percent rate that applied in 2011 and 2012.1

•     Investment income such as capital gains and dividends will be subject to higher tax rates, and for certain higher-income taxpayers, will be subject to a new 3.8 percent tax on net investment income.

•     Some tax credits and deductions will disappear or be limited.

•     Estate and gift taxes will rise and apply to far more taxpayers.

Consider that the higher your income, the more significant the tax changes are likely to be. There is speculation that Congress and the President will agree on a plan to scale back or postpone many of these tax hikes, but it isn’t clear when or if such an agreement will occur.

Timely opportunities to consider now

Making tax-efficient moves before the end of the year is particularly challenging given the question mark surrounding the tax landscape. But uncertainty doesn’t preclude the importance of considering steps that can help you be as prepared as possible regardless of what comes out of Washington. Keep in mind that the “fiscal cliff” situation may not be limited to 2012 – the following action steps to consider apply to most economic landscapes in which consumers are anticipating a rise in taxes the following calendar year.

Though you should never make financial decisions based only on tax efficiency, here are five potential moves to consider making now if they fit into your overall short-term financial plan:

#1 – Convert retirement savings to a Roth IRA

You can convert some or all of your workplace savings plan dollars, if the plan allows, or traditional IRA assets to a Roth IRA. Dollars in a Roth IRA grow on a tax-deferred basis, and withdrawals can qualify for tax-free treatment if holding period requirements are met. Since a Roth conversion is a taxable event, 2012 may be the best opportunity for those who are considering it since tax rates for many people are likely to be lower in 2012 than they will be in the coming years. Another advantage of converting to a Roth is that you can change your mind, and “re-characterize” the dollars converted back to a traditional IRA before October 15, 2013. In short, any decision made to convert today is not final, but waiting until after the New Year will make the conversion subject to potentially higher tax rates.

#2 – Accelerate income

In most years, individuals try to find ways to reduce taxable income and accelerate deductible expenses. This time, it may make sense to accelerate income as much as possible into 2012 and defer deductible expenses to reduce your 2013 income, if you have the flexibility to do so. One note – higher income people may not want to overdo it on deferring deductible expenses as new tax policies being considered could limit deductions in 2013 and beyond for those reaching certain income thresholds.

#3 – Sell appreciated assets

As the law stands today, the tax rate on long-term capital gains realized when an asset is sold (such as a stock or mutual fund) will rise to a top rate of 20 percent in 2013. In 2012, the top long-term capital gains tax rate is just 15 percent. Investment income could also be subject to an additional 3.8 percent net investment income surtax in 2013 (related to the Affordable Care Act) if you reach certain income thresholds, adding to the tax burden. There is an important caveat to mention – don’t sell an asset simply for purposes of potentially reducing the tax impact of the sale. You must first determine whether selling the asset is a beneficial move for you and makes sense as part of your overall financial plan regardless of the tax consequences.

#4 – Take advantage of gift tax savings

In 2012, the lifetime gift tax exclusion amounts are $5.12 million for individuals or $10.24 million for a couple. These rules have not been extended beyond 2012, so this may be the best opportunity for those with accumulated wealth to reduce their estates in such a tax-favorable environment. Be sure any gifting is consistent with plans you already have and is not done simply due to 2012’s more favorable tax environment.

#5 – Accelerate medical expenses into 2012

If you anticipate costly medical procedures and can get them completed and fully paid for in 2012, there may be a better chance for tax savings. In 2012, taxpayers who itemize deductions can claim unreimbursed medical expenses that exceed 7.5% of adjusted gross income (AGI). Only those expenses that exceed 10 percent of AGI in 2013 will be deductible.

As always, any tax-related decisions should be made only after consulting with your tax advisor. Meeting with a financial professional can help you assess financial strategies that are most suitable for the uncertain tax environment that exists as 2012 comes to a close and 2013 begins with new changes in place.

___

Due to industry regulations, I cannot respond to your questions and comments underneath my blog, but please feel free to contact me directly via email at Steven.B.Gross@ampf.com or via phone at 914-923-6490 ext. 310. This communication is published in the United States for residents of New York only; and this advisor is licensed only in the states of PA, CT, MD, GA, NJ, NC, FL, MA, ME.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
McKey Rivers June 18, 2013 at 04:18 pm
I believe Mr. Wasserman retained an attorney after Mr. Maglietta used the platform of school boardRead More President to announce that Mr. Wasserman was disqualified from taking his place on the Board because he wrote a letter questioning a Board action. What kind of a message was that to send to employees and others who may think the Board has done something wrong? Think twice or the School Board President will berate you in public and on TV. Mr. Maglietta as Board President also declared Mr. Wasserman's letter would be posted on the district's web site, but that didn't happen either. Let's call Mrs Maglietta's letter for what it is: the spouse of the defeated candidate for school board who has twice been shown to be wrong on issues related to the letter making a public plea for the wrong doing to be swept to avoid her husband being found culpable for his actions after he leaves office.
Laura Maglietta June 18, 2013 at 04:20 pm
Mr. McKey Rivers- Yes, the PTA FOILED the 11 page letter from Mr. Wasserman. If you like, you canRead More FOIL the FOIL. The community should know that this 11 page letter exists; it should know that Mr. Wasserman contacted an attorney. So, according to you, Mr. Bear (your icon is humorous) , Mr. Wasserman should have been the one to decide what was proper and what wasn't proper. Please check your facts - the BOE did make cuts from the original budget. So you believe that the District should spend funds on responding to Mr. Wasserman's 11 page letter. Perhaps the other BOE members do not agree that a response is warranted and would be waste of taxpayer dollars. And, if you and Mr. Sharif, two fictitious people, wish to underwrite the legal fees associated with this, please do. Unfortunately, real people will actually have to pay for it.
Laura Maglietta June 18, 2013 at 04:38 pm
Mr. Rivers - Interesting Mr. Rivers that you know with certainty Mr. Wasserman's motives behindRead More contacting an attorney. Well, now the community can feel better that a fake person is making such definitive claims. So, accordingly to your thinking, the letter should NOT have been made public. Why? All potential legal matters are public information, e.g. the notice of claims on the fields. I have read many times your scathing remarks about this board's lack of transparency. It was appropriate for the community to know about its existence. The only "wrong" here is the bullying that went on by Mr. Wasserman , et al. I am happy that my husband did not resort to such disgusting and ugly campaign tactics . This is Mr. Wasserman and his supporters legacy to this election and what he brings to the district as a BOE trustee.
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 02:43 pm
What are folks hearing about tomorrow's vote? Will there be a good turnout at the polls?
Briarcliff PTA Executive Board June 18, 2013 at 10:02 am
We are hoping for a great turnout today. Briarcliff school district residents, please urge yourRead More neighbors and friends to get out and vote!
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 03:04 pm
Thanks Kathleen - important information about a significant part of the pet population!
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 03:05 pm
Thanks Kathleen! Important information about a nice way to connect senior pets with senior humans!
W Obermeyer June 11, 2013 at 02:29 pm
I am afraid we may be experiencing the calm before another storm. Most likely the aftermath of theRead More BOE budget hearing tonight will be more of a nightmare than a pleasant dream.
Lisa Jenner June 11, 2013 at 02:36 pm
I am afraid that when people become civilized, they become silent.
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 11:42 am
Thanks for putting yourself out there, Lisa! I hope others can contribute meaningfully to anyRead More discussion of community issues brought forth by thoughtful readers like you.
Brandon June 12, 2013 at 09:36 am
This is brilliant!
Mae Isaac June 12, 2013 at 09:49 am
This would be wonderful - I dread trying to drive to any of the schools that way. What about a leftRead More turn lane on to Pleasantville Road from 100 for school days? It might help those of us who live so close and yet have to drive in the opposite directions to reach the schools!
Tim June 14, 2013 at 07:53 am
Great idea in the mean time while we wait another 10 years maybe drivers could keep to the left whenRead More turning left, instead of blocking peeps trying to turn right. Also drivers need to stop blocking the entrance to Dunkin donuts etc.
Mickey Rivers June 11, 2013 at 09:52 am
Mr. O'Reilly is asking good questions in his post. I respect him for his approach. These areRead More difficult questions and as school districts continue to be squeezed at both ends (spiraling cost of benefit and pension costs at one end and tax-cap compliance choking the revenue side at other end) they will all continue be faced with these difficult questions. If school districts wait too long to develop reasonable decision trees to solve these issues, then our meddling friends in Albany will feel compelled to swoop in and screw it up royally. It is in our collective best interests to begin work now to develop and apply a thought process and resolution matrix to this issue before Albany does it for us. That requires two things. First, communities must put aside their differences and work together in a "non-partisan" manner toward local solutions that work for their district. Next, districts must collaborate and share ideas in an effort to share their ideas and help each other. At the moment, no one has the answers to Mr. O'Reilly's questions. I respect him for asking these questions and not offering solutions or opinions in his post. I also respect him for not calling out any particular district as we all all know these are issues that all districts faced this year universally. This issue will begin to compound annually if we all don't find a way to pull together and work towards solutions.
Lisa Jenner June 11, 2013 at 10:26 am
As a retired school teacher who is collecting a pension (to which I contributed for many years) andRead More is still using benefits (to which I contribute), let's remember that it is not only the teachers' pension and benefits that are squeezing the school budgets, but also, as the Briarcliff BOE pointed out, all those unfunded mandates. All of the BOEs have their hands tied regarding so many of their expenditures, that they will have to cut programs. Excellent questions, Mr. O'Reilly.
Mickey Rivers June 11, 2013 at 03:30 pm
Unfunded mandates are also a big issue for school districts. However, the teachers pensions andRead More benefits are a huge issue that must be addressed and recalibrated. It is time for teacher's pensions and benefits to be remodeled to look like those in the private sector. In the private sector, pensions are all but extinct - replaced largely by 401(k) plans (and in the case of teachers 403(b) plans where contributions are made by the employee. In terms of health benefits, in the private sector most companies pay a maximum of 60% of an employee's health care (and other benefits) premiums - not the 80% that is paid by school districts for teachers. This is financially unsustainable and needs to be addressed before it bankrupts school districts.
robin June 11, 2013 at 10:52 am
Mr. Borrel-Sorry if I came across as confrontational, that was not my intention. You should handleRead More your concerns as you think is best, however, I don't know what you will accomplish voicing your opinion in the Patch. It should also be noted, according to several high school teachers, that there are students who bring budget discussions into the classrooms.
Jay Borrel June 11, 2013 at 11:29 am
Thank you for your comments. I am sure that students do discuss, but the educator should addressRead More from a neutral stand point, just like an open discussion about religion or other politics.
Lisa Jenner June 11, 2013 at 12:25 pm
As a former high school teacher, I was constantly fending off attempts by students to divert me fromRead More teaching, and current events, local or otherwise, were a popular means to this end. Having said that, I, too, have heard of teachers "pontificating" about the budget, which, of course, is totally inappropriate. Let's hope the teachers in Briarcliff do know better and that the administration keeps a watchful eye. On a totally different topic, I have to laugh, Robin, at you looking in the directory for Mr. Borrel. The directory is my first resource for all people Briarcliff, forgetting they might not have children in the schools.
JanFisher June 8, 2013 at 10:05 pm
This is truly progress. Will both of you be taking down your negative comments now to really andRead More meaningfully get the ball rolling and to move beyond mere words? It will be good work when it is backed by real actions. I have not posted anything negative this entire time so really nothing has been accomplished yet except promises to behave. But I am truly glad that both of you are now committed to a standard of decency in public exchanges. Have a great weekend!
Lisa Jenner June 8, 2013 at 11:41 pm
I have read and re-read Mr. O'Reilly's thoughts on the BOE meeting and I will try to be fair aboutRead More this. I will admit that Mr. O'Reilly used some choice adjectives (strange, mysterious, nefarious) and asked a couple of somewhat inflammatory rhetorical questions (Will Mr. Wasserman serve his BOE time on the baseball diamond?), but I would suggest that if you disregard the rhetoric, he has presented a fairly factual presentation of what transpired at the meeting. Do you disagree?
JanFisher June 9, 2013 at 05:54 am
Lisa - my decision to write at all was out of excitement about the opportunity to help infuseRead More decency into these public exchanges. I have had my say and it has been positive. Quite honestly, I think the community at-large and the Briarcliff community are really tired of all of the public infighting on the Patch. I am committed to our schools and children and I choose to use my very limited free time and energy to volunteer for the schools when I can. Again, I do have many opinions and would love to speak with you in person- maybe we can do some good together. My cell - 439-0203.