.
Feedback

Tips to Saving on Car and Home Insurance

Tips on how to save on your home and auto insurance.

Countless ads on television, radio and in your mailbox urge you to choose a new insurance company that vows to save you money on auto and home premiums. While it often sounds too good to be true, the reality is that with some serious shopping and good planning, sometimes you can find less expensive insurance options. It’s easy to get overwhelmed by the offers, but in this day of rapid communication, the process can be relatively easy and efficient. If you have any luck, the savings could be worth it.

Start by knowing exactly the kind of coverage you have today. Before you call around or check out quotes on the Internet, have your current policies in front of you in order to compare “apples to apples” as you look at the numbers. Make sure a policy at a better price is giving you the same (or better) coverage than you receive now.

Another preliminary step before pursuing car insurance deals is to check your driving record to make sure it’s accurate. If you’re clear of any recent accidents or tickets, you might obtain a better price than if you’ve had a recent incident. Check with your state’s Department of Motor Vehicles if you have any doubts about your record.

Where to cut costs on car insurance

Competition for car insurance business is strong, which works to the benefit of consumers. Ask your current agent or insurance company about ways your existing policy could become less expensive for you. Many companies even offer “renewal discounts.” Beyond that, here are different types of discounts that may apply to you that can help reduce your auto insurance expense:

•     Good student – insurance companies may reduce the cost of including a child on a policy if his or her grade point average is at or above a specified level.

•     Senior citizen – seniors with good driving records may qualify for lower rates. In some cases, those who pass a special course (such as defensive driving) may save on their policy as well.

•     Low risk occupation – depending on how you earn your living, the insurance company might consider you a safer risk and offer a lower premium as a result.

•     Professional organization – being affiliated with certain organizations, including auto clubs like AAA, can result in a savings on your insurance.

•     Auto safety features – most policies will adjust rates based on the availability of certain safety features on your vehicle, such as antilock brakes and airbags. On the contrary, certain expensive or high performance cars may come with a bigger insurance price tag.

Be sure to inquire about your eligibility for any discounts. Also look into whether it would be worthwhile to raise the deductible on your policy. A typical deductible is $500. If you’re willing to take on more risk, you could raise the deductible, for example, to $1,000 and reduce your premiums. Determine if this might make financial sense for you.

Shopping for homeowner’s coverage

As with car insurance, raising the deductible on homeowner’s coverage is one simple way to reduce your insurance costs, though this can be risky. Make sure your higher deductible is still something you could afford on short notice should something unfortunate happen. Others include:

•     Having proper safety equipment in place, such as smoke alarms, CO2 detectors and even stronger roofing materials to withstand storms.

•     Installing a home security system – reducing the chance of vandalism or burglary may allow for lower premiums on insurance coverage.

•     Estimating rebuilding costs – while it may cost more to replace your home than what you paid for it, remember part of the value you paid for was the land your home sits on. Make sure replacement costs are appropriate for your needs and you aren’t paying for too much coverage.

Ask your insurance company or those you are pricing for comparison purposes to let you know of other discounts that may apply.

Most important – get what you need

You need to be sure the coverage you have on your vehicles and your home gives you the peace of mind you desire. Don’t sacrifice the level of security you require just to save a few dollars on your premium. The insurance provider you choose should provide you with the right coverage for your circumstances at the best available price. Consider working with a financial advisor who can help you determine what auto, home and other insurance policies may make sense for you and your family.

_________________________________________________________________

Due to industry regulations, I cannot respond to your questions and comments underneath my blog, but please feel free to contact me directly via email at Steven.B.Gross@ampf.com or via phone at 914-923-6490 ext. 310.

This communication is published in the United States for residents of New York only; and this advisor is licensed only in the states of PA, CT, MD, GA, NJ, NC, FL, MA, ME.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 05:07 pm
CORRECTION TO LAST POST: The last sentence should read: "Let's continue to share, butRead More face-to-face." Thx - Sonny
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 06:06 am
Thanks, Jon - you raise important considerations and in a calm, dispassionate way, which IRead More appreciate. As for alternative funding mechanisms, in hindsight I believe they should have been examined and addressed this earlier this year had the decision-making been opened up to the public in a completely bidirectional manner much earlier in this year's budget cycle. A real take-away from this situation, in my opinion, is that we in the community were not given the opportunity to sit down together with sharpened pencils in a public forum and allowed to vet and actually challenge the Administration's assumptions in order to arrive at budget alternatives with the Administration and Board. The comparison you make with Washington is indeed apt in that it reflects the way decisions have slid back to being made in a vacuum and handed down to the voters instead of in a democratic fashion based on budget-to-actuals instead of budget-to-budget figures combined with the practice of over-reserving for expense items while under-estimating revenues. Although the Board did indeed reach out to me and 2 others asking for suggestions, when we re-iterated our request for an open meeting format to include other financially savvy community members, these requests were consistently ignored. Which is why we are in the current position we are in having to decide on Tues on a tax levy cap-busting budget requiring 60% super-majority. Which the public will decide, of course, and we will live with the consequences: either it passes, or the Board and Administration will be forced to rein in the excesses. And much as I love open debate, I restate that online posting leaves does leave a lot to be desired. Let's continue to share, but not face-to-face. Respectfully - Sonny
Jon Satran May 18, 2013 at 12:16 am
Sonny, I like the idea of brainstorming together, thinking outside of the box, but there are someRead More major obstacles that I think you need to consider: 1) A Bond referendum requires a 45 days’ notice period. It cannot be presented for a vote before this year's budget process is concluded. 2) To release reserves based on the hope that a future bond vote would be successful is reckless. What happens if reserves are released and then the bond referendum fails? You would not risk your home finances with this type of risk, would you really risk your school’s financial health? 3) Our tax certiorari reserve was just recently reviewed in consultation with our attorneys and we are appropriately reserved for today’s commercial real estate market. 4) Most importantly, this proposal would create a larger and tougher tax increase next year. In other words, adding $1,000,000 of revenue this year through a loan would require replacing that revenue with an additional $1,000,000 again next year and the year after. Borrow and spend economics does not work as we have seen from the national level. Deficit spending, which has been suggested may or may not work in Washington, but it certainly does not in Briarcliff Manor. When the school’s reserves are exhausted, we will face impactful program cuts or much larger tax levy increases. Respectfully - Jon Satran
JanFisher May 17, 2013 at 10:55 pm
It is so wonderful that, recognizing the importance of STEM and following the recommendation of ourRead More educators, Sal Maglietta and Jon Satran agreed to bring on the district's first director of instructional technology.
McKey Rivers May 10, 2013 at 07:36 pm
Thank you Dr. Sternberg for your thoughtful letter. You hit on an important facet of this electionRead More few if any others have stated: electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder will provide the added benefit of diversity of thought as the Board continues to address difficult, ongoing educational and financial issues. There is a woeful absence of synergy produced by articulation of different views among the current Board members. The absence of a “check and balance” on the current Board is reflected in the inexplicable decision to cancel the May 13 BOE meeting (scheduled since last summer), which is the last meeting prior to the May 21 budget vote and board election. Is there no business for the Board to conduct at this critical juncture or could it be that the Board does not want Briarcliff residents to hear members of the community question the Board about the proposed budget right before the election? Electing either Mr. Linder and/or Mr. Wasserman will immediately benefit the public as the highest vote getter will be seated on May 22 and thus participate in formulating a second budget for public vote that, notwithstanding current BOE scare tactics, can be tax levy compliant and not involve additional program elimination or reduction. There is no doubt that electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder to the Briarcliff School Board will substantially benefit the entire Briarcliff community and provide a much needed check on Board decision making.
Herman Sexton May 10, 2013 at 03:48 pm
Electing Paul Wasserman alone would add a diversity of thought. The guy hears at least a dozenRead More voices in his head. Have you ever spoken to him? Did you pay attention when he was running for Congress for a few weeks? Ugh.