.
Feedback

To Own or to Rent: Recalculating in Today's Housing Market

Some comparative hints to help you make the right decision on renting a home or owning a home.

It used to be the American dream included owning a home with a yard and white picket fence. Now the pendulum seems to have swung dramatically in the other direction. Post housing bubble burst, some Americans are beginning to re-think the conventional wisdom that owning a home is a good investment—even though declines in home prices have made purchasing owning one somewhat more affordable.

Home ownership levels peaked in 2008 at nearly 70 percent of Americans, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. That number has now dipped to 65 percent.

The numbers indicate that depressed home values in most markets, combined with historically low interest rates on mortgages, have made home buying more attractive. But that's only one consideration, as many found out during the housing market bust. Home ownership is a great deal if you know you're in a position to settle in the same place for at least a few years and can continue to afford the payments. Unfortunately, these circumstances can be unpredictable.

When deciding to buy or rent a home, financial considerations are important, but lifestyles issues should also be taken into account.

Financial considerations

Many financial elements favor home ownership, particularly if you live in a market where home values seem reasonable. Today's favorable loan interest rate environment is another plus, and current laws still provide major tax incentives for those who carry a mortgage. beyond those factors is the appeal of building up equity in the home—meaning that the money you put into making the purchase will eventually be returned to you when you sell the property.

Yet these benefits should be tempered by other considerations. Taking on a mortgage obligates you to live p to the terms of the loan for years and homes typically require a significant investment in maintenance and occasional improvements. And when it comes to a home as an investment, there's no guarantee you will be able to sell your property for more than what you paid for it.

Renting is a realistic starting point for most. As your savings grow and your credit score rises, you may be in a position to qualify for a mortgage and make the leap to home ownership. But choosing the right time to buy is important—you need to feel secure that your source of income will be there for the long run.

The downside for those who continue to rent is that any money put into their living space—whether for rent and related fees or for upgrades to their rental property—s not an investment, but an expense. While a homeowner may have an opportunity for some kind of return on money put into the property, renters won't receive any payback.

Lifestyle Considerations

Personal traits and current life circumstances are other considerations as you assess the option of renting or buying.

Homeowners should be up to the task of maintaining their own property. That include everything from lawn work to minor home repairs. It also means having the financial ability to pay for professionals to do occasional work, including plumbers, electricians, and carpenters. Renters, on the other hand, typically enjoy a more maintenance-free lifestyle.

Another issue is the need for mobility. Those who are quite certain they can count on their job being in the same area can feel more comfortable making the jump to home ownership, provided they can afford it. Those who expect to be on the move for a job change or educational opportunities in the next three to five years may appreciate the relative mobility they have as a renter.

What's right for you?

There is no "one-size-fits-all" answer to the question of whether you should own or rent your home. A good starting point is to honestly answer questions such as:

  • Are you comfortable with your current life circumstance and income stability?
  • Are you disciplined in managing your expenses and paying off debts on a timely basis?
  • Are you fairly confident you won't be required to move to another city or area int he next five years for personal, work or education purposes?

A "yes" answer to all three may point in favor of home ownership, but it isn't a decision to take lightly. Consider working with a financial advisor who can help you work through your financial situation, define your goals and determine what kind of mortgage you can afford while still keeping your other financial lifestyle goals in mind.  _________________________________________________________________

Due to industry regulations, I cannot respond to your questions and comments underneath my blog, but please feel free to contact me directly via email at Steven.B.Gross@ampf.com or via phone at 914-923-6490 ext. 310.This communication is published in the United States for residents of New York only; and this advisor is licensed only in the states of PA, CT, MD, GA, NJ, NC, FL, MA, ME.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 05:07 pm
CORRECTION TO LAST POST: The last sentence should read: "Let's continue to share, butRead More face-to-face." Thx - Sonny
Sonny (Louis) Linder May 18, 2013 at 06:06 am
Thanks, Jon - you raise important considerations and in a calm, dispassionate way, which IRead More appreciate. As for alternative funding mechanisms, in hindsight I believe they should have been examined and addressed this earlier this year had the decision-making been opened up to the public in a completely bidirectional manner much earlier in this year's budget cycle. A real take-away from this situation, in my opinion, is that we in the community were not given the opportunity to sit down together with sharpened pencils in a public forum and allowed to vet and actually challenge the Administration's assumptions in order to arrive at budget alternatives with the Administration and Board. The comparison you make with Washington is indeed apt in that it reflects the way decisions have slid back to being made in a vacuum and handed down to the voters instead of in a democratic fashion based on budget-to-actuals instead of budget-to-budget figures combined with the practice of over-reserving for expense items while under-estimating revenues. Although the Board did indeed reach out to me and 2 others asking for suggestions, when we re-iterated our request for an open meeting format to include other financially savvy community members, these requests were consistently ignored. Which is why we are in the current position we are in having to decide on Tues on a tax levy cap-busting budget requiring 60% super-majority. Which the public will decide, of course, and we will live with the consequences: either it passes, or the Board and Administration will be forced to rein in the excesses. And much as I love open debate, I restate that online posting leaves does leave a lot to be desired. Let's continue to share, but not face-to-face. Respectfully - Sonny
Jon Satran May 18, 2013 at 12:16 am
Sonny, I like the idea of brainstorming together, thinking outside of the box, but there are someRead More major obstacles that I think you need to consider: 1) A Bond referendum requires a 45 days’ notice period. It cannot be presented for a vote before this year's budget process is concluded. 2) To release reserves based on the hope that a future bond vote would be successful is reckless. What happens if reserves are released and then the bond referendum fails? You would not risk your home finances with this type of risk, would you really risk your school’s financial health? 3) Our tax certiorari reserve was just recently reviewed in consultation with our attorneys and we are appropriately reserved for today’s commercial real estate market. 4) Most importantly, this proposal would create a larger and tougher tax increase next year. In other words, adding $1,000,000 of revenue this year through a loan would require replacing that revenue with an additional $1,000,000 again next year and the year after. Borrow and spend economics does not work as we have seen from the national level. Deficit spending, which has been suggested may or may not work in Washington, but it certainly does not in Briarcliff Manor. When the school’s reserves are exhausted, we will face impactful program cuts or much larger tax levy increases. Respectfully - Jon Satran
JanFisher May 17, 2013 at 10:55 pm
It is so wonderful that, recognizing the importance of STEM and following the recommendation of ourRead More educators, Sal Maglietta and Jon Satran agreed to bring on the district's first director of instructional technology.
McKey Rivers May 10, 2013 at 07:36 pm
Thank you Dr. Sternberg for your thoughtful letter. You hit on an important facet of this electionRead More few if any others have stated: electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder will provide the added benefit of diversity of thought as the Board continues to address difficult, ongoing educational and financial issues. There is a woeful absence of synergy produced by articulation of different views among the current Board members. The absence of a “check and balance” on the current Board is reflected in the inexplicable decision to cancel the May 13 BOE meeting (scheduled since last summer), which is the last meeting prior to the May 21 budget vote and board election. Is there no business for the Board to conduct at this critical juncture or could it be that the Board does not want Briarcliff residents to hear members of the community question the Board about the proposed budget right before the election? Electing either Mr. Linder and/or Mr. Wasserman will immediately benefit the public as the highest vote getter will be seated on May 22 and thus participate in formulating a second budget for public vote that, notwithstanding current BOE scare tactics, can be tax levy compliant and not involve additional program elimination or reduction. There is no doubt that electing Mr. Wasserman and/or Mr. Linder to the Briarcliff School Board will substantially benefit the entire Briarcliff community and provide a much needed check on Board decision making.
Herman Sexton May 10, 2013 at 03:48 pm
Electing Paul Wasserman alone would add a diversity of thought. The guy hears at least a dozenRead More voices in his head. Have you ever spoken to him? Did you pay attention when he was running for Congress for a few weeks? Ugh.