.
Feedback

Police Release More Details in Grant Death, Case Remains Open

A timeline for Grant's approximate whereabouts is revealed.

Saratoga Springs Police have completed an investigation of "active leads" in the death of 19-year-old Briarcliff Manor resident Alexander Grant, the department announced today.

Grant disappeared after attending a party during spring break in March and was found a few days later.

Police have released additional details surrounding the teenager's death, while the Saratoga County District Attorney for small crimes will be offered to witnesses with further information about the mysterious events surrounding Grant's disappearance on Sunday, March 6.

Following an autopsy performed by Albany Medical Center, Grant's cause of death was listed as "asphyxia due to drowning with contributing factors of intoxiation and probably hypothermia."

At his time of death, Grant's blood alcohol content was 0.16.

"A low level of THC (marijuana) was also detected," police reported, while no .

According to police, the Boston College student arrived in Saratoga Springs prior to 8:30 p.m. on March 5, picked up a friend and arrived at Skidmore College, where he planned to stay with a friend on campus.

Police said "Grant and several others are drinking beer and tequila in one of the dorm rooms" prior to 10:28 p.m., when they took a bus from the campus to the downtown area. They then walked to a party at 146 Church St., where Grant was allegedly dancing with a female between 11 and 11:30 p.m.

Police said someone over the age of 21 purchased alcohol for the party, but do not know how the alcohol was obtained for the minors drinking in the Skidmore College dormitory.

"Two female Skidmore students are identified as having contact with Grant at the party, however, both report that Grant was only there for a short time before he went to another part of the house and they never saw him again," police said in a statement.

Police said they were notified of the party at approximately 11:50 p.m., "had a difficult time controlling the unruly crowd."

A friend of Grant sent approximately six text messages to him between 11:37 p.m. that night and noon on Sunday inquiring about his whereabouts.

Police broke up the party at approximately 12:30 a.m. and witnesses reported Grant had already left by that time.

"Surveillance video at the train station on Station Lane off of West Avenue in Saratoga Springs shows Alexander Grant walking to the front of the building from Station Lane at 11:31 p.m.," police reported. "He is alone, fully clothed and appears to be staggering as he walks."

Police stressed, "It is important to note that no one and no vehicles approach the train station for a considerable amount of time before or after Grant appears on the video," and said they do not know how or why Grant was at the station that night.

He was last seen on the video "heading north along the tracks towards the Church Street overpass," at 11:34 p.m. He appeared to be alone.

Grant was next seen on surveillance video at a medical office building at 3 Care Ln., where he is shown "kicking in a small 3x3 window at the entrance to the building."

At this time, it appeared he was wearing one sock, a long sleeve white shirt and shorts. Dirt is apparent on his back. He is also "bleeding considerably."

Police said Grant did not leave the lobby of the building and did not attempt to break into any offices, though did seem "disoriented and/or intoxicated," as he "is stumbling into the walls and repeatedly loses his balance."

Grant left the building at 2:11 a.m. Police were notified of the break-in at 12:36 p.m. and any blood trail evidence would have been washed away by rain at that time. However, Grant's Boston College ID was recovered by a building employee.

Grant was reported missing by two students at 4:47 p.m. on Sunday evening and is identified as the person breaking into the building.

As a search begins along the railroad tracks, a team discovers Grant's pants and wallet on top of a snow bank between the medical building on Care Lane and railroad tracks. A single set of footprints are also seen along the tracks, heading north.

After a storm stalled Sunday's search, an "intensive search with additional manpower" picked up the next day at approximately 10:30 a.m. until dusk.

The next day, March 8, a search started at 9:45 a.m. and Grant's body was found by Saratoga Springs Fire Department personnel at 10:43 a.m. He was found submerged in Putnam Creek "under an ice shelf in about four feet of water approximately 30 yars from where the last set of footprints were seen during the search on the night of the 6th."

Though he was injured, police believe injuries were the result of "stumbling through the woods," rather than from assault.

"The known facts of the case tend to support the conclusion made regarding the cause of death," police reported. "Alexander Grant apparently became lost and disoriented due to his level of intoxication, and suffering from the effects of hypothermia, tragically fell into the Putnam Creek and was unable to pull himself to safety."

Police further reiterated, they "do not suspect foul play" in the death. However, attempts to interview other partygoers of 146 Church St. have been unsuccessful, according to police.

"With the exception of one of the occupants, who police spoke with last week, all have declined written requests by police to their attorneys to make them available for interviews. The friend that Alexander Grant had come to visit and planned to stay with while in Saratoga Springs has also decided not to speak with police any further and has obtained legal counsel," police said.

Grant's shoes and cell phone have not been recovered, though police said several voicemails and text messages were received, but never answered, between 11:37 p.m. on Saturday and noon on Sunday.

"At this point the Saratoga Springs Police have no more active leads," according to a statement. "However the case will remain open in the event that someone comes forward with information about the critical time period between when Grant leaves the party and he arrives at the train station."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasantville-Briarcliff Manor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
W Obermeyer May 21, 2013 at 01:13 pm
It would be funny were it not so sad. I recall seeing and hearing quite a lot of mud being slungRead More recently, in an unseemly manner, but by whom I wonder?
McKey Rivers May 21, 2013 at 12:51 pm
Mike, please try to keep it together later and don't be acting out again. The last thing theRead More community needs is another schools related criminal harassment case.
Jay Borrel May 21, 2013 at 12:42 pm
WRONG!
McKey Rivers May 21, 2013 at 12:56 pm
OMG!!! Is someone referring to Stacy Agona's experience on the School Board as a basis in decidingRead More how to vote today? Oh wait, that's her husband. One of my favorite Stacy moments on the school board was when, after having been a trustee for a year, a reference was made during a public meeting to the "reserve fund" and she blurted out, "What's that?"
Jay Borrel May 21, 2013 at 12:42 pm
There is nothing respectful about Mr. Valenti. While telling us that everyone else uses ugly andRead More negative campaigning, he forces his message down our throats with his constant badgering and pushing. And, while I do disagree with Mr. Agona at least he is a voice less heard, however a home buyer will definitely think twice when seeing that our schools are not ranked at the top, but our spending is. A home buyer would definitely think twice when seeing that our board went against the levy and asked for more. A home buyer will think twice when seeing that our board underhandedly appointed a superintendent with out any notice to the community of a vacancy. These are trustees, but how can we trust them. With regards to understanding the budget or not, a home buyer only sees the surface and there will be NO TRUST in this community if we do the wrong thing.
Rod Agona May 21, 2013 at 12:20 pm
Empty Nesters and everyone else: I respectfully disagree with Mr. Borrel on his post. There areRead More many reasons behind why the budget proposal by the BOE and the administrators exceeds the tax cap guideline. I ask that you check my wife’s posting in the Patch for more insight but I will not repeat here. From personal experience, my perspective is that young parents looking to buy a home will research many things including the community support for the schools. It is fairly common to look into school board budget voting as an impartial indicator of the community's support. Imagine you are deciding between towns X and Y and then you hear that town X voted down the budget. You won’t research any further if this is important to you. You will move on to another place where there is more support. Please consider this into your decision when voting today. A vote for the budget approval will do a great service to the protection of our real estate values, not to mention preserve educational excellence in the eyes of the experts we are currently paying to make those recommendations. I believe most Briarcliff residents will agree with me as evidenced by the fact that there has not been a budget rejection by the public in decades. I would also like to personally congratulate the current Briarcliff BOE trustees for being the only school district in Westchester County to propose a lower budget than they did the prior year. Vote YES to the proposed Briarcliff budget. Vote JON SATRAN and SAL MAGLIETTA for BOE trustees.
Mike Valenti May 21, 2013 at 03:36 pm
It is Election Day in Briarcliff. There are TWO school board seats up for grabs and a budget to beRead More voted on. Please join me in voting for JON SATRAN and SAL MAGLIETTA to continue their terms as school board trustees. Please also join me in voting YES on the proposed school budget. Your vote for JON and SAL is a vote FOR continued TRANSPARENCY, RESPECT, COMMUNITY VOICE, COLLABORATION, PARTNERSHIP, CIVILITY, FISCAL PRUDENCE and MUCH MORE. Moreover, your vote for JON and SAL is a vote AGAINST the type of UGLY, NEGATIVE, MUDSLINGING campaigning you are witnessing (especially in these final, desperate hours) from the Linder/Wasserman camp. If we are ever to see this type of campaigning cease we must SPEAK LOUD AND CLEAR and SEND A MESSAGE that it does NOT appeal to us here in Briarcliff and we will NOT support the candidates forwarded or supported by those who conduct themselves in this unseemly manner. Please VOTE YES for JON and SAL. Please VOTE NO for SLEAZY SMALL-TOWN POLITICS. Respectfully, Mike Valenti
Jay Borrel May 21, 2013 at 01:04 pm
Wouldn't it be great if Mike Valenti moved out of Briarcliff?
Jay Borrel May 21, 2013 at 09:31 am
Hey Mike, the only thing worse than a tax hike and a secret appointment of a superintendent with outRead More looking at other candidates is your wasting our time with endless BS
Jay Borrel May 21, 2013 at 01:05 pm
Wouldn't it be great if Mike Valenti moved out of Briarcliff?
Gargamel May 21, 2013 at 07:26 am
Jay: more like Poooofff! Time to back to the North State Spa
Jay Borrel May 20, 2013 at 09:57 pm
Mr. Valenti your small mind is imploding
Jay Borrel May 21, 2013 at 08:25 pm
Wow Eric, how can I be hiding? I live here, you can look me up. I doesn't take much research orRead More rocket science. See you on the other side.
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) May 21, 2013 at 03:00 pm
Hi all -- lively discussion is fantastic and encouraged, but any personal and/or ad hominem attacksRead More will be deleted. Thanks for your cooperation.
Eric Nadler May 21, 2013 at 02:39 pm
As I write this I know that it is a mistake but I can't let it go. Mr. Rivers and Mr. Borrel pleaseRead More unmask yourselves. At least Ms. Agona and Mr Valenti (and myself) have the decency to make our views know publicly. By all means you have the right to voice your opinions but to do so under the guise of anonymity is what I would call cowardly. How can the voting public take your comments seriously if you don't have the gumption to stand behind them in public for the community to see. With that said - Mr Rivers, Mr Borrell take off your masks! Let's have a dialog face to face.
Jay Borrel May 21, 2013 at 01:06 pm
Wouldn't it be great if Mike Valenti moved out of Briarcliff?
W Obermeyer May 20, 2013 at 03:07 pm
I wonder why the voice of reason is suddenly so vocal? Reminds me of some earlier exchanges, if youRead More have read one you have read them all.
The Real Herman Sexton May 20, 2013 at 02:57 pm
oh wow, let's relive the attempted election of Mike Valenti several years ago. We went throughRead More this, proved I was a resident, etc. Anyway, does anyone know anyone in Briarcliff more annoying than Mike Valenti